Received: from mail-ee0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:35822) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RdNgy-0003mi-2U; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:02:59 -0800 Received: by eekc4 with SMTP id c4sf6185335eek.16 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:02:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=X0BsWsWAGgMuWgx2xteDZ1eUBPgnYAJFelAnzQ52v90=; b=3iBMIbncHXmZieMyxV7vPLJC0x2VtkjVIxGhDScCsAZfwMziUycruzjjrwY0a33e4h tZ7bfEZ6x+eMfwfW222CKMjjqeGyp7qOFMcAyeZSU8iYq1KRYxsrAFDGC52jstaG+UB3 J5FvnU7BKAijvq37ersiIiw8MRw+NRjO6Hz+0= Received: by 10.205.133.15 with SMTP id hw15mr12685bkc.14.1324479760595; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:02:40 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.15.148 with SMTP id f20ls2723412eef.3.canary; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:02:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.23.12 with SMTP id p12mr1184045ebb.0.1324479758925; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.23.12 with SMTP id p12mr1184043ebb.0.1324479758805; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ey0-f176.google.com (mail-ey0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i11si3878404eea.0.2011.12.21.07.02.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.176; Received: by mail-ey0-f176.google.com with SMTP id c13so9490145eaa.21 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:02:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.146.79 with SMTP id g15mr2130151bkv.121.1324479758619; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.44.199 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:02:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111216231440.GO22027@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20111216193101.GG22027@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <4EEBA63B.4050403@gmail.com> <20111216201841.GL22027@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <1324076918.98018.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111216231440.GO22027@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:02:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Mini-rant: mutce and traji must die. From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c414286556004b49b79be X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --0015174c414286556004b49b79be Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm sorry, Robin, but I agree with arpis (and to whatever extent John E Clifford agrees). One of the reasons I studied Loglan in the first place (and lojban after it) was precisely because of the oddity of the sumti place system. If I wanted an system based on prepositional particles, I'd learn English. (Well, I did, but I didn't exactly have any choice in the matter). Back when I learned Loglan (1975), the didn't even HAVE any modals that I am aware of (but then again, this was before "Loglan 2" and/or "Loglan 3" ever came out, so it was just learning from Loglan 1, the primer, and Loglan 4&5, the dictionary. So maybe they did have them, and I was unaware of it (well, I know they had the four why/becauses (the modern day ki'u, ri'a, mu'i,ni'i), if that counts)). I always feel like I'm somehow "cheating" when I use a BAI. Not that I don't use them. I do, an awful lot. But it just feels very unlojbanic, IMHO. I'm ambivalent about the x2 in he colors. --gejyspa On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Robin Lee Powell < rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > See, I *like* {x1 is bluer than x2}. *That* is a good use of place > structure; it gives you immediate access to extra meaning you might > actually want with no extra syllables. > > -Robin > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:08:38PM -0800, John E Clifford wrote: > > Back in the day, most basic adjectives were inherently comparative: > {blanu} was > > officially "x1 is bluer than x2" (with maybe a few more places -- this > is a > > Loglan word here, btw). This always raised the question, when you > wanted to use > > the merely attributive sense, "What is it bluer than when it is simply > blue" and > > the answer always was (though no one ever seemed to like) "the > > standard/average/typical/.... one of what ever x1 is relevantly at the > moment", > > roughly "blue for a ...". I was usually elided in the "you know what I > mean" > > way, though the opponents always treated it as a "something" elision. > (Using > > basic comparatives makes a couple of moves in semantics a lot easier, > which is > > why it was used. I miss it) > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: .arpis. > > To: lojban@googlegroups.com > > Sent: Fri, December 16, 2011 2:36:13 PM > > Subject: Re: [lojban] Mini-rant: mutce and traji must die. > > > > One of the things I really like about lojban (in the abstract, not > necessarily > > in practice) is that selbri have places which make explicit certain > things which > > are completely implicit in other languages; one example: {rajycla} has a > "by > > standard" place (inherited from {clani}), which makes it clear that the > > "standard of tallness" matters in any discussion of height, and requires > a > > different selbri ({rajycla be zi'o}) to ignore it. > > > > It seems to me that spoken lojban will (almost) never use more than three > > places, common written lojban will behave similarly, and technical or > pedantic > > lojban will have some words (depending on context) which use more places. > > > > {.ua ro di'u na'e se ganzu} > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Robin Lee Powell < > rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:12:43PM -0600, vitci'i wrote: > > >> On 12/16/2011 01:31 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > >> > These places must die! > > >> > > >> I'm kind of curious to see how far this can be taken. What would > > >> happen if, even in gismu, we forbade any place that can be > > >> replaced by a modal? > > > > > >Can those places be replaced by a modal? Which one? > > > > > >I have, fwiw, considered that posibility in my head as well. I > > >think that's too much of some-other-language-that-isn't-Lojban. > > > > > > > > >> Consider {cusku}. > > >> > > >> x1 (agent) expresses/says x2 (sedu'u/text/lu'e concept) for > > >> audience x3 via expressive medium x4. > > >> > > >> cusku1 is covered by {gau}, and cusku3 is covered by {ri'i}. > > >> cusku4 is covered by {xebe'i}. Though I'm stretching a bit, cusku2 > > >> could be covered by {fi'o jufra}, leaving us with a zero-place > > >> gismu. > > > > > >*snrk* > > > > > > > > >> I am vaguely imagining a language centered around modals rather > > >> than predicates, with selbri being created implicitly and nonce by > > >> the lists of their places. I'm not sure that this is different > > >> from all gismu having exactly one place. > > > > > >Yeah, as I say, I've pondered that as well as a thought experiment, > > >but it's a different language. Probably a much more verbose one. > > > > > > > > >-Robin > > > > > >-- > > >http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > > >Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot > > >is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" > > >is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ > > > > > > > > >-- > > >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > >"lojban" group. > > >To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > >For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > mu'o mi'e .arpis. > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "lojban" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "lojban" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > -- > http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot > is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" > is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0015174c414286556004b49b79be Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=A0 =A0I'm sorry, Robin, but I agree with arpis (and t= o whatever extent John E Clifford agrees). =A0One of the reasons I studied = Loglan in the first place (and lojban after it) was precisely because of th= e oddity of the sumti place system. =A0If I wanted an system based on prepo= sitional particles, I'd learn English. =A0(Well, I did, but I didn'= t exactly have any choice in the matter). =A0Back when I learned Loglan (19= 75), the didn't even HAVE any modals that I am aware of (but then again= , this was before "Loglan 2" and/or "Loglan 3"=A0ever c= ame out, so it was just learning from Loglan 1, the primer, and Loglan 4&am= p;5, the dictionary. =A0So maybe they did have them, and I was unaware of i= t (well, I know they had the four why/becauses (the modern day ki'u, ri= 'a, mu'i,ni'i), if that counts)). =A0I always feel like I'm= somehow "cheating" when I use a BAI. =A0Not that I don't use= them. =A0I do, an awful lot. =A0But it just feels very unlojbanic, IMHO.
=A0 I'm ambivalent about the x2 in he colors.

<= div>=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0--gejyspa

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Robin Lee Powell <= rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org<= /a>> wrote:
See, I *like* {x1 is bluer than x2}. =A0*Tha= t* is a good use of place
structure; it gives you immediate access to extra meaning you might
actually want with no extra syllables.

-Robin

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:08:38PM -0800, John E Clifford wrote:
> Back in the day, most basic adjectives were inherently comparative: {b= lanu} was
> officially "x1 is bluer than x2" (with maybe a few more plac= es -- this is a
> Loglan word here, btw). =A0This always raised the question, when you w= anted to use
> the merely attributive sense, "What is it bluer than when it is s= imply blue" and
> the answer always was (though no one ever seemed to like) "the > standard/average/typical/.... one of what ever x1 is relevantly at the= moment",
> roughly "blue for a ...". =A0I was usually elided in the &qu= ot;you know what I mean"
> way, though the opponents always treated it as a "something"= elision. (Using
> basic comparatives makes a couple of moves in semantics a lot easier, = which is
> why it was used. =A0I miss it)
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: .arpis. <
rpg= lover64+jbobau@gmail.com>
> To: lojban@googlegroups.com=
> Sent: Fri, December 16, 2011 2:36:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [lojban] Mini-rant: mutce and traji must die.
>
> One of the things I really like about lojban (in the abstract, not nec= essarily
> in practice) is that selbri have places which make explicit certain th= ings which
> are completely implicit in other languages; one example: {rajycla} has= a "by
> standard" place (inherited from {clani}), which makes it clear th= at the
> "standard of tallness" matters in any discussion of height, = and requires a
> different selbri ({rajycla be zi'o}) to ignore it.
>
> It seems to me that spoken lojban will (almost) never use more than th= ree
> places, common written lojban will behave similarly, and technical or = pedantic
> lojban will have some words (depending on context) which use more plac= es.
>
> {.ua ro di'u na'e se ganzu}
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:12:43PM -0600, vitci'i wrote:
> >> On 12/16/2011 01:31 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >> > These places must die!
> >>
> >> I'm kind of curious to see how far this can be taken. Wha= t would
> >> happen if, even in gismu, we forbade any place that can be > >> replaced by a modal?
> >
> >Can those places be replaced by a modal? =A0Which one?
> >
> >I have, fwiw, considered that posibility in my head as well. =A0I<= br> > >think that's too much of some-other-language-that-isn't-Lo= jban.
> >
> >
> >> Consider {cusku}.
> >>
> >> x1 (agent) expresses/says x2 (sedu'u/text/lu'e concep= t) for
> >> audience x3 via expressive medium x4.
> >>
> >> cusku1 is covered by {gau}, and cusku3 is covered by {ri'= i}.
> >> cusku4 is covered by {xebe'i}. Though I'm stretching = a bit, cusku2
> >> could be covered by {fi'o jufra}, leaving us with a zero-= place
> >> gismu.
> >
> >*snrk*
> >
> >
> >> I am vaguely imagining a language centered around modals rath= er
> >> than predicates, with selbri being created implicitly and non= ce by
> >> the lists of their places. I'm not sure that this is diff= erent
> >> from all gismu having exactly one place.
> >
> >Yeah, as I say, I've pondered that as well as a thought experi= ment,
> >but it's a different language. =A0Probably a much more verbose= one.
> >
> >
> >-Robin
> >
> >--
> >http://singinst= .org/ : =A0Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
> >Lojban (http:= //www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
> >is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "th= is sentence is false"
> >is "na nei". =A0 My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/r= lp/
> >
> >
> >--
> >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google= Groups
> >"lojban" group.
> >To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >lojban+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .arpis.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubs= cribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/= lojban?hl=3Den.
>

--
http://singinst.org/= : =A0Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
Lojban (http://www.loj= ban.org/): The language in which "this parrot
is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this senten= ce is false"
is "na nei". =A0 My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0015174c414286556004b49b79be--