Received: from mail-pw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:48466) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RdQ4I-000580-O9; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:35:11 -0800 Received: by pbcc3 with SMTP id c3sf5270153pbc.16 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:35:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=PD2DyvY7lNWFbzAff6PrGhg9CUBKic0I9R9Y4hXT2kw=; b=IwosA6WaSQlNzRnPhYocVozK3+o6H1mSe6hrrxz+gtrkMvkK+I43IqFbHKwtJZwuXA dod6MvpAGjWZjPLoFa5uNoOWSTsvrAYsqYUdJ0EtfnVFdzTZnaQG0C5iduu6D+vbJ+gJ hr58o8B7ZO0jnc20l9H5GBAQR4wyT4IJroDsU= Received: by 10.68.191.36 with SMTP id gv4mr1613139pbc.3.1324488897165; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:34:57 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.118.41 with SMTP id kj9ls9689227pbb.1.gmail; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.190.2 with SMTP id gm2mr5576144pbc.4.1324488896590; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.190.2 with SMTP id gm2mr5576143pbc.4.1324488896577; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c2si7241248pbe.0.2011.12.21.09.34.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RdQ47-00057w-CO for lojban@googlegroups.com; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:34:55 -0800 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:34:55 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Mini-rant: mutce and traji must die. Message-ID: <20111221173454.GU22027@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <20111216193101.GG22027@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <4EEBA63B.4050403@gmail.com> <20111216201841.GL22027@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <1324076918.98018.YahooMailRC@web81303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20111216231440.GO22027@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / You started that like you were disagreeing with me, and then went on to say nothing that I disagree with, except that I don't consider BAI cheating. What stance is it that you think I have that you just disagreed with? -Robin On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:02:38AM -0500, Michael Turniansky wrote: > I'm sorry, Robin, but I agree with arpis (and to whatever extent John E > Clifford agrees). One of the reasons I studied Loglan in the first place > (and lojban after it) was precisely because of the oddity of the sumti > place system. If I wanted an system based on prepositional particles, I'd > learn English. (Well, I did, but I didn't exactly have any choice in the > matter). Back when I learned Loglan (1975), the didn't even HAVE any > modals that I am aware of (but then again, this was before "Loglan 2" > and/or "Loglan 3" ever came out, so it was just learning from Loglan 1, the > primer, and Loglan 4&5, the dictionary. So maybe they did have them, and I > was unaware of it (well, I know they had the four why/becauses (the modern > day ki'u, ri'a, mu'i,ni'i), if that counts)). I always feel like I'm > somehow "cheating" when I use a BAI. Not that I don't use them. I do, an > awful lot. But it just feels very unlojbanic, IMHO. > > I'm ambivalent about the x2 in he colors. > > --gejyspa > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Robin Lee Powell < > rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > > > See, I *like* {x1 is bluer than x2}. *That* is a good use of place > > structure; it gives you immediate access to extra meaning you might > > actually want with no extra syllables. > > > > -Robin > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:08:38PM -0800, John E Clifford wrote: > > > Back in the day, most basic adjectives were inherently comparative: > > {blanu} was > > > officially "x1 is bluer than x2" (with maybe a few more places -- this > > is a > > > Loglan word here, btw). This always raised the question, when you > > wanted to use > > > the merely attributive sense, "What is it bluer than when it is simply > > blue" and > > > the answer always was (though no one ever seemed to like) "the > > > standard/average/typical/.... one of what ever x1 is relevantly at the > > moment", > > > roughly "blue for a ...". I was usually elided in the "you know what I > > mean" > > > way, though the opponents always treated it as a "something" elision. > > (Using > > > basic comparatives makes a couple of moves in semantics a lot easier, > > which is > > > why it was used. I miss it) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: .arpis. > > > To: lojban@googlegroups.com > > > Sent: Fri, December 16, 2011 2:36:13 PM > > > Subject: Re: [lojban] Mini-rant: mutce and traji must die. > > > > > > One of the things I really like about lojban (in the abstract, not > > necessarily > > > in practice) is that selbri have places which make explicit certain > > things which > > > are completely implicit in other languages; one example: {rajycla} has a > > "by > > > standard" place (inherited from {clani}), which makes it clear that the > > > "standard of tallness" matters in any discussion of height, and requires > > a > > > different selbri ({rajycla be zi'o}) to ignore it. > > > > > > It seems to me that spoken lojban will (almost) never use more than three > > > places, common written lojban will behave similarly, and technical or > > pedantic > > > lojban will have some words (depending on context) which use more places. > > > > > > {.ua ro di'u na'e se ganzu} > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Robin Lee Powell < > > rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:12:43PM -0600, vitci'i wrote: > > > >> On 12/16/2011 01:31 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > >> > These places must die! > > > >> > > > >> I'm kind of curious to see how far this can be taken. What would > > > >> happen if, even in gismu, we forbade any place that can be > > > >> replaced by a modal? > > > > > > > >Can those places be replaced by a modal? Which one? > > > > > > > >I have, fwiw, considered that posibility in my head as well. I > > > >think that's too much of some-other-language-that-isn't-Lojban. > > > > > > > > > > > >> Consider {cusku}. > > > >> > > > >> x1 (agent) expresses/says x2 (sedu'u/text/lu'e concept) for > > > >> audience x3 via expressive medium x4. > > > >> > > > >> cusku1 is covered by {gau}, and cusku3 is covered by {ri'i}. > > > >> cusku4 is covered by {xebe'i}. Though I'm stretching a bit, cusku2 > > > >> could be covered by {fi'o jufra}, leaving us with a zero-place > > > >> gismu. > > > > > > > >*snrk* > > > > > > > > > > > >> I am vaguely imagining a language centered around modals rather > > > >> than predicates, with selbri being created implicitly and nonce by > > > >> the lists of their places. I'm not sure that this is different > > > >> from all gismu having exactly one place. > > > > > > > >Yeah, as I say, I've pondered that as well as a thought experiment, > > > >but it's a different language. Probably a much more verbose one. > > > > > > > > > > > >-Robin > > > > > > > >-- > > > >http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > > > >Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot > > > >is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" > > > >is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups > > > >"lojban" group. > > > >To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > > >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > >lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > >For more options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > mu'o mi'e .arpis. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "lojban" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "lojban" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > > > -- > > http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > > Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot > > is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" > > is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "lojban" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.