Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:55902)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCKvA2oWYARCx09r3BBoEhDXlOA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Refuu-00031F-4C; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:42:40 -0800
Received: by vbbfs19 with SMTP id fs19sf6249368vbb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:42:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from
         :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=gvx4lqKXqum0UtfwsGJsGUobHLxRw9ltmJNxmdndQ+I=;
        b=ZPZ9JTCXTF7NS+0ZwvBPc1lwZWhlVmAkQ7d+zocmG/A6DkktkulkSfqSxALMwbVC0z
         Cljy7X48KaUsxNmEBPFqGKaNgs+3Ym2x2XONntZ1k8ysI7j8Sv/59WLQonsIy4xDYJ0l
         0SIa2jSc5oTKXoOMFLwU0QRqmQeZCMWTjXXS4=
Received: by 10.52.92.234 with SMTP id cp10mr2759301vdb.6.1324788145475;
        Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:42:25 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.33.18 with SMTP id n18ls7270357vdi.4.gmail; Sat, 24 Dec
 2011 20:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.174.114 with SMTP id br18mr18711941vdc.2.1324788144834;
        Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.174.114 with SMTP id br18mr18711940vdc.2.1324788144826;
        Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f47.google.com (mail-vw0-f47.google.com [209.85.212.47])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s13si5397181vdt.2.2011.12.24.20.42.24
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.47;
Received: by vbbfc21 with SMTP id fc21so8284808vbb.6
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:42:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.71.168 with SMTP id w8mr10290143vdu.58.1324788144743; Sat,
 24 Dec 2011 20:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.172.167 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 23:42:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOQ8VDU8XDbnUx_ccwZLKeH0=rr2DbxO1CUCw95SqjDS0BKjPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban] Polar Opposites and Agentives
From: tsani nicte <nictytan@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071cddcc523b804b4e346ce
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

--20cf3071cddcc523b804b4e346ce
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

How come the gimste has somtimes a different gismu that's simply defined as
the polar opposite of another? Why not just use to'e?
The example that comes to mind is: sutra vs masno

Conversely, I once saw a like of gismu that had both agentive and
non-agentive versions. Why not just use -gau lujvo?
The example that comes to mind is: catra vs morsi

mu'o mi'e tan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--20cf3071cddcc523b804b4e346ce
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

How come the gimste has somtimes a different gismu that&#39;s simply define=
d as the polar opposite of another? Why not just use to&#39;e?<div>The exam=
ple that comes to mind is: sutra vs masno</div><div><br></div><div>Converse=
ly, I once saw a like of gismu that had both agentive and non-agentive vers=
ions. Why not just use -gau lujvo?</div>
<div>The example that comes to mind is: catra vs morsi</div><div><br></div>=
<div>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e tan</div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



--20cf3071cddcc523b804b4e346ce--