Received: from mail-iy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:63819) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RfCcp-00029l-ON; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:38:09 -0800 Received: by iaeh11 with SMTP id h11sf31060137iae.16 for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:38:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-property:x-yahoo-newman-id :x-ymail-osg:x-mailer:references:message-id:date:from:subject:to :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=h1ba2FeryHj5fBW5kXwZwsqGZSD4BEnt//9DjwVsklw=; b=BpcL2zkIgAf7gWm25zHDOLLehgH9ZvoF25MVRworIcKf74pj3uycUmJmtIZDau1w9S ORNIzr76dEUmqyn1lrNmxwl3pWospvUjv/6f1KkmaTyZ1ZxXBH7tYyiXWogHcr5vqH1H cXk1WMP6vLCSDLi+zv0+BV+ZloKBV+h9HnDRo= Received: by 10.50.45.225 with SMTP id q1mr7148998igm.3.1324913877523; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:37:57 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.68.202 with SMTP id w10ls15140408ibi.7.gmail; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:37:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.46.194 with SMTP id x2mr9968447igm.2.1324913875543; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:37:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.46.194 with SMTP id x2mr9968446igm.2.1324913875511; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:37:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from nm1.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm1.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com. [66.94.237.202]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id wm10si13670675igc.1.2011.12.26.07.37.55; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:37:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.202 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.94.237.202; Received: from [66.94.237.200] by nm1.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Dec 2011 15:37:55 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.105] by tm11.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Dec 2011 15:37:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1010.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Dec 2011 15:37:55 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 155403.43337.bm@omp1010.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 57399 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Dec 2011 15:37:54 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: ft8saCkVM1m.iZLVj6fkjT9NPvxRKs7l.QgNsdGUaHjDsUZ 4JTYVS28kgv5oM9xFT2Zhi9DGr2EfmkQfjhQiFHbqK2UsNe2g4sv8vEYi1vr wKcqwuuoyiwsm_rDaTg.GmEruCja.7PLqwlj6K0RqTHn21MCbsb_konYOt1t cZ34uWurO6Po4cnCToVTEkTZLBjzbHC5HXAKsoFQOUFdJ6lPInO1Nx1w0mKZ z2QDBjcZW6UhXN1lbUkpEntkSJAfUvppbZJiAuvmcdxKQJ5PTVnQ4DfEE_cw T1xppX7DJt866PpcQF8L_iOO2HinoKRQ9IX9I7qk.crIvzrsy3vqb1lWVi5_ rgyqn7AvWFnDEpFDZQcZCYCF2rn027EvIyBTG.Tx7yB0Y3pPEMjfqZv6i3Yt BvnyBLTA.x37FDf4kzkQf6CmTTd.1hNVVdQYdUFBAfEsClw_NsrmotpqZBbE Z2PJTKbUukWAH0dqtWxSOpE1_IGY5QYLwpDiNYbrg7trTpUvxOWqbLDEAIep 2czv1UcLxMhvvMDOf2cQ4ZcZuF.pH72HtM1MuobVhZNXhPqWQbO1S1_q5NTf FDZLPAfqvjkT7as7jznnY.L_GbeYshIur6lRJBLUa_UOPQnessG7rHHQNJt7 S6wDyteNLBnLtazR9P4GNv5Xhz_iyxA-- Received: from [99.92.108.41] by web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:37:54 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/708 YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698 References: Message-ID: <1324913874.43312.YahooMailRC@web81302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:37:54 -0800 (PST) From: John E Clifford Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Polar Opposites and Agentives To: lojban@googlegroups.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 66.94.237.202 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="202631991-37180378-1324913874=:43312" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --202631991-37180378-1324913874=:43312 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Polar opposite prefix and agentive suffix are two of the features (in the deprecative sense) of the cursed E---o. I prefer having separate words for good and bad, death and murder, etc. There are limits, of course, but it is never clear where they are -- and they aren't the same for everybody. You can always use the lujvo and presumably be understood, though perhaps suspected of meiosis. ________________________________ From: david demartin To: lojban@googlegroups.com Sent: Sun, December 25, 2011 4:50:24 PM Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Polar Opposites and Agentives word frequency in those widely spoken languages did counte in the creation of gismu http://www.lojban.org/tiki/gismu+Brochure http://dag.github.com/cll/4/4/ and what you see as _pointless_ can be seen as quite _relevant_ depending on what you WANT... bottom line, is: you could break any language in zeros and ones, and there is no definitive reason to put these units in bigger packs, as human beings tend to do (we don't think or talk only with 0 and 1). Off course, you might feel that in general it is less _pointless_ trying to get closer to such a language (made only of 0 and 1)... 2011/12/25 tsani nicte It just seems to me like there are a lot of _pointless_ gismu that are simply in reality semantic variations of another gismu. >It's true that we want to consider "making love" and "rape" to be different, and >in fact, the particular distinction is achieved through >lujvo, not through entirely different gismu. Also, I believed that the six >source languages were only used in determining the >sounds used in making the gismu. What deserved a gismu and what did not was >rather arbitrary, if I recall correctly. This is why we >have gismu such as "nikle" and "rozgu" which simply don't deserve gismu at all. >(These are leftover from Loglan, I believe.) > > >I think that the size of the gimste could be effectively reduced if we dropped >all these agentive/non-agentive and polar opposite gismu. >Otherwise, what's really preventing surgau from having its own gismu? or, for >that matter, any lujvo at all? > > > >On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 2:55 PM, ianek wrote: > >There are more such cases, like {zdani} and {xabju} - as I see it, >>it's the same relation, only different order of arguments. >> >>mu'o mi'e ianek >> >>On 25 Gru, 16:00, david demartin >>wrote: >> >>> my guess is that the 6 or so languages used to find common words as base >>> for gismu had all distinct terms for fast/slow... (as opposed to >>> fast/non-fast). >>> ...and we might indeed want to make THAT kind of a difference between >>> killing and dying for example... a little bit like we want to distinguish >>> between "making love" and "raping": although one is just a slight variation >>> of the other, we kind of WANT to consider them different things altogether >>> (as to assign them very different terms). >>> >>> dyabudy >>> >>> 2011/12/25 tsani nicte >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > How come the gimste has somtimes a different gismu that's simply defined >>> > as the polar opposite of another? Why not just use to'e? >>> > The example that comes to mind is: sutra vs masno >>> >>> > Conversely, I once saw a like of gismu that had both agentive and >>> > non-agentive versions. Why not just use -gau lujvo? >>> > The example that comes to mind is: catra vs morsi >>> >>> > mu'o mi'e tan >>> >>> > -- >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> > "lojban" group. >>> > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> > For more options, visit this group at >>> >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >>-- >>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>"lojban" group. >>To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>For more options, visit this group at >>http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> > > -- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"lojban" group. >To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --202631991-37180378-1324913874=:43312 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Polar opposite prefix and agentive suffix are two of the featu= res (in the deprecative sense) of the cursed E---o.  I prefer  ha= ving separate words for good and bad, death and murder, etc.  There ar= e limits, of course, but it is never clear where they are -- and they aren'= t the same for everybody.  You can always use the lujvo and presumably= be understood, though perhaps suspected of meiosis.



From: david demartin <davidandresloq= uehay@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, December 25, 2011 4:50:24 PM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Polar Opposites and Agentives<= br>

word frequency in those widely spoken languages did counte in the creation = of gismu
http://www.lojban.org/tiki/gismu+Brochure
http://dag.= github.com/cll/4/4/

and what you see as _pointless_ can be seen as quite _relevant_ depend= ing on what you WANT...
bottom line, is: you could break any language i= n zeros and ones, and there is no definitive reason to put thes= e units in bigger packs, as human beings tend to do (we don't think or talk= only with 0 and 1).
Off course, you might feel that in general it is less _pointless_ trying to= get closer to such a language (made only of 0 and 1)...


2011/12/25 tsani nicte <nictytan@gmail.com>
It just seems to me like there are a lot of= _pointless_ gismu that are simply in reality semantic variations of anothe= r gismu.
It's true that we want to consider "making love" and "rape" to be different= , and in fact, the particular distinction is achieved through
lujvo, not through entirely different gismu. Also, I believed that the= six source languages were only used in determining the 
sou= nds used in making the gismu. What deserved a gismu and what did not was ra= ther arbitrary, if I recall correctly. This is why we
have gismu such as "nikle" and "rozgu" which simply don't deserve gism= u at all. (These are leftover from Loglan, I believe.)

=
I think that the size of the gimste could be effectively reduced if we= dropped all these agentive/non-agentive and polar opposite gismu.
Otherwise, what's really preventing surgau from having its own gismu? = or, for that matter, any lujvo at all?


On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 2:55 PM, ianek <janek37@gmail.com> w= rote:
There are more such cases, like {zdani} and= {xabju} - as I see it,
it's the same relation, only different order of arguments.

mu'o mi'e ianek

On 25 Gru, 16:00, david demartin <davidandresloque...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> my guess is that the 6 or so languages used to find common words = as base
> for gismu had all distinct terms for fast/slow... (as opposed to
> fast/non-fast).
> ...and we might indeed want to make THAT kind of a difference between<= br> > killing and dying for example... a little bit like we want to distingu= ish
> between "making love" and "raping": although one is just a slight vari= ation
> of the other, we kind of WANT to consider them different things altoge= ther
> (as to assign them very different terms).
>
> dyabudy
>
> 2011/12/25 tsani nicte <n= icty...@gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > How come the gimste has somtimes a different gismu that's simply = defined
> > as the polar opposite of another? Why not just use to'e?
> > The example that comes to mind is: sutra vs masno
>
> > Conversely, I once saw a like of gismu that had both agentive and=
> > non-agentive versions. Why not just use -gau lujvo?
> > The example that comes to mind is: catra vs morsi
>
> > mu'o mi'e tan
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl= e Groups
> > "lojban" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.


=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegro= ups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl= e.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--202631991-37180378-1324913874=:43312--