Received: from mail-iy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:61650) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Rg3J3-0003ej-Sj; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:53:14 -0800 Received: by iaeh11 with SMTP id h11sf41960790iae.16 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:53:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=TEv5uhqj2+xrL1ItmcaVNcZemWvrH+jKEJ/VTyz+bkM=; b=2eHDGrKVtSZOT1E2IlCW5VDqmfnoT+cCrOQVw7wGlE0KuiBIDkbcxknFVSTnl5eKgI OVMAtYT4GAk0u/N4QlJg1bIhCtvSpK5Cc75v0VkEPN+lVJvczdxc6grnDEmmInsbSSLE P2gTxyQjfUXTk7MFCYvmA41bGcgasdSmiaBcw= Received: by 10.50.184.137 with SMTP id eu9mr9977198igc.1.1325116383652; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:53:03 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.169.97 with SMTP id ad1ls18788134igc.1.gmail; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:53:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.193.133 with SMTP id ho5mr14699195igc.2.1325116382486; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:53:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.193.133 with SMTP id ho5mr14699194igc.2.1325116382476; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:53:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gx3si16385400igb.0.2011.12.28.15.53.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:53:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.172 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.172; Received: by mail-iy0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z21so672941iab.3 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:53:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.100.164 with SMTP id ez4mr18561356igb.12.1325116382248; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:53:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.134.199 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 15:53:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <10845771.1190.1325109180483.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqbl25> References: <10845771.1190.1325109180483.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqbl25> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:53:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Namespaces From: Remo Dentato To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rdentato@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rdentato@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Maybe Danny could elaborate a little bit more on his question. I interpreted "namespace" in the same sense it is used for programming languages: "A namespace (sometimes also called a name scope) is an abstract container or environment created to hold a logical grouping of unique identifiers or symbols (i.e., names). [...] The same identifier can be independently defined in multiple namespaces." (from Wikipedia). With this interpretation the question is whether in Lojban I can set {mamta} to mean "mother" in a context and "apple" in another context. It's about the identifier, the word {mamta} itself, not about the fact that {lo mamta} and {le mamta} (or even {la .mam.}) refer to different mothers (which they can and most probably do). But, as I said, maybe Danny had something different in mind. Remod On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:53 PM, djandus wrote: > Actually, I would say that Lojban does have to what you are referring, if I > understand you correctly. > > The simplest way of explaining it could be how to refer to a mother. > {lo mamta} means "one who is a mother" -- this refers to something that > matches the "universally" agreed-upon definition of {mamta} > {le mamta} means "one that I describe as a mother" -- this is more > subjective, and makes no claim that everyone would agree with the > description > {la .mam.} is more like the name "Mom" that you might call someone. > > So, if I'm interpreting your question correctly, then yes, {lo} is kind of > like being in the "global" namespace, where {le} is kind of like being in > the "local" namespace. {la} is very loose -- it's basically a different name > format, as it doesn't require a grammatical word, but only a pronounceable > word. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/wmugjUNm2VUJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.