Received: from mail-bk0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:63666) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RyU6i-0006dn-IB; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:08:49 -0800 Received: by bkty15 with SMTP id y15sf3923847bkt.16 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:08:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=zre9UHw9lcMzR1HGCCg+CvLcxyp/ZgvlwMTxHaFFywc=; b=hyd8CMEMlZUopD0RJTu153A8Hsn8T//pU77/TkiWXs76+PdyaGOAFOX1OqMbU8yqTW ajlOh/oTNLN16SWmGHukm1HFZF9QDGGK/ZdNWq2Dk6x23ZY+l1m9YS+3FBbVXtyU/XLN jZZkA3xt1nacINs3N0g3Wg2nYsajTyVdRBG+Y= Received: by 10.204.13.65 with SMTP id b1mr933645bka.1.1329509305492; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:08:25 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.33.141 with SMTP id h13ls5139398bkd.7.gmail; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.133.213 with SMTP id g21mr788831bkt.3.1329509304382; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.133.213 with SMTP id g21mr788830bkt.3.1329509304356; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l17si13243208bkb.1.2012.02.17.12.08.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.44; Received: by mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com with SMTP id l5so6419165lah.17 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.101.42 with SMTP id fd10mr3017516lbb.107.1329509304154; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:08:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.66.177 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:08:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201202171401.18594.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201202171401.18594.phma@phma.optus.nu> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:08:04 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] telgau To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9d67d94ccbafe04b92e81c5 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --14dae9d67d94ccbafe04b92e81c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 01:20:37 MorphemeAddict wrote: > > Are all these definitions in {lojbo jufsisku} right? I'm > > wondering specifically about "telgau" and related forms. > > telga'o > > *lujvo* g1=s2 is locked, preventing access to g2 by g3, the lock being s1 > > using mechanism s3. Cf. stela, ganlo, telgau, ga'orgau. > > > > telgau > > *lujvo* g1 locks lock s1 on s2 by mechanism s3. > > Cf. stela, gasnu, telga'o, ga'orgau. > > > > telcaugau > > *lujvo* g1 unlocks/unseals c1=s2 using lock/seal s1 with mechnism s3. > > Cf. stela, claxu, gasnu, toltelgau, telga'o, ga'orgau. > > > > toltelgau > > *lujvo* g1 unlocks lock s1 on s2 by mechanism s3. > > Cf. to'e, stela, gasnu, telgau, telga'o, telcaugau, kargau. > > I think "lock" and "unlock" should be "telga'ogau" and "telkargau". > "telgau", > I think, should mean "to put a lock on", that is, if you have a door with a > hole for a lock, you put a lock in it. "telcaugau" would then mean "to make > something lockless", and "toltelgau" makes me wonder what a "tolstela" (an > unlock?) is. (There are two prefixes "un-" in English; one is from "*anti" > and > may be closer in meaning to "fat-", and the other is from "*ne" and means > "tol-" or "nal-". Some words, such as "untied", can have either and it's > sometimes hard to tell which.) Something can have a lock and not be locked. > > Pierre > How does "gasnu" fit into the words for 'lock' or 'unlock' or 'add a lock to', i.e., telgau, toltelgau, telcaugau. It seems to me that the "gau" component should be "ga'o", but there is a separate word "telga'o", not equal to "telgau". stevo > -- > li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du > li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --14dae9d67d94ccbafe04b92e81c5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Pierre = Abbat <phma@phma= .optus.nu> wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 01:20:37 MorphemeAddict wro= te:
> Are all these definitions in {lojbo jufsisku} right? I'm
> wondering specifically about "telgau" and related forms.
> telga'o
> *lujvo* g1=3Ds2 is locked, preventing access to g2 by g3, the lo= ck being s1
> using mechanism s3. Cf. stela, ganlo, telgau, ga'= ;orgau.
>
> telgau
> *lujvo* g1 locks lock s1 on s2 by mechanism s3.
> Cf. stela, gasnu, telga'o, ga'orgau.
>
> telcaugau
> *lujvo* g1 unlocks/unseals c1=3Ds2 using lock/seal s1 with mechn= ism s3.
> Cf. stela, claxu, gasnu, toltelgau, telga'o, ga&= #39;orgau.
>
> toltelgau
> *lujvo* g1 unlocks lock s1 on s2 by mechanism s3.
> Cf. to'e, stela, gasnu, telgau, telga'o, tel= caugau, kargau.

I think "lock" and "unlock" should be "telga= 'ogau" and "telkargau". "telgau",
I think, should mean "to put a lock on", that is, if you have a d= oor with a
hole for a lock, you put a lock in it. "telcaugau" would then mea= n "to make
something lockless", and "toltelgau" makes me wonder what a = "tolstela" (an
unlock?) is. (There are two prefixes "un-" in English; one is fro= m "*anti" and
may be closer in meaning to "fat-", and the other is from "*= ne" and means
"tol-" or "nal-". Some words, such as "untied"= ;, can have either and it's
sometimes hard to tell which.) Something can have a lock and not be locked.=

Pierre

How does "gasnu" fit into the words for 'lock= ' or 'unlock' or 'add a lock to', i.e., telgau, toltelg= au, telcaugau. It seems to me that the "gau" component should be = "ga'o", but there is a separate word "telga'o",= not equal to "telgau".=A0

stevo=A0



=A0
--
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--14dae9d67d94ccbafe04b92e81c5--