Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:65062)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCsv_75BBoEVQBv3Q@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Ryjou-0002ot-P7; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:55:28 -0800
Received: by wera13 with SMTP id a13sf3784939wer.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:55:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=WahSZtSQB9McO5gj31YrYM7u2yQZ7/8K0Je1lJY9Vpo=;
        b=3DgS58afvT88QpOeah19USuY9giKWB/Ndo60mkeZ+Qw59v2BQjBiGUCK+y+SFrkSYu
         fjIEhaueRCmb32jgoqtfs1kvYB0l4K/QRqRysSyi6ly57tiQqCoJMO4jTV1sCG2JZX2F
         z8GJ5DG8jkSttJfYY+C6a+eStj7fBJi/KwRnQ=
Received: by 10.216.136.93 with SMTP id v71mr117964wei.14.1329569708249;
        Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:55:08 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.213.3.210 with SMTP id 18ls1659960ebo.1.gmail; Sat, 18 Feb
 2012 04:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.129.137 with SMTP id hi9mr962568bkc.8.1329569707029;
        Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.205.129.137 with SMTP id hi9mr962567bkc.8.1329569707016;
        Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20si15974186bko.3.2012.02.18.04.55.06
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.42;
Received: by lagk11 with SMTP id k11so5487784lag.29
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 10.112.10.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.10.169;
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.10.169])
        by 10.112.10.169 with SMTP id j9mr5005316lbb.70.1329569706725 (num_hops = 1);
        Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:55:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.10.169 with SMTP id j9mr4181810lbb.70.1329569706667; Sat,
 18 Feb 2012 04:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.110.105 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:55:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201202180002.25250.phma@phma.optus.nu>
References: <201202180002.25250.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 09:55:06 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2eE8QUMg=1F-VT+dBZog8QRnpgk2Rbm6rTNozZwKSfpNw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] masknonji
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> This is the largest pike. "masklonji" is invalid

Or rather, it is the valid sentence "ma sklonji"

>("lonji" has gismu form,
> therefore "paklonji" has lujvo form, therefore "klonji" is a slinku'i,
> therefore "sklonji" is valid).

The conclusion is correct, but I don't follow the reasoning. I don't
think "klonji" being a slinku'i has anything to do with it.
"sklonjiju" is  valid too, and yet "klonjiju" is not a slinku'i.

> Is "masknonji" valid? By my rules and by vlatai
> it is, but I'm not sure about xorxes's rules, because the "n" could be
> syllabic.

If -sk was allowed as a valid coda, then "mask,non,ji" would be valid.

By my rules, the "n" cannot be syllabic here, because that would leave
the following syllable without an onset. By my rules a syllabic
consonant must always be followed (as well as preceded) by another
consonant, or be at the end of a cmevla.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.