Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:54412) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S0mri-0004UG-1A; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:34:49 -0800 Received: by yhgg71 with SMTP id g71sf1682667yhg.16 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:34:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=P6P8qRJ+UZRgQgZhrslaI9767AYH3b7VJkLCPl7nEmI=; b=2w+AO45ZERqdjVoWFeUr/0GHSF6ZFImvpxlmxt6chdjcgQl1ayENCUFc/Rzp4XsdIc Kiu3K4V3CbLrutp3QbBbzOqXaSWQEc8WrtAR4agUnplZD4LeiGn+6oAcJN552acsiD77 zkbYgY6IkyZKnjlO2HOh6y8wdKk0nVuA5pRU0= Received: by 10.52.178.104 with SMTP id cx8mr21394vdc.12.1330058070915; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:34:30 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.96.162 with SMTP id dt2ls2420483vdb.3.gmail; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:34:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.19.15 with SMTP id a15mr375645vde.3.1330058069284; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:34:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.19.15 with SMTP id a15mr375644vde.3.1330058069270; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:34:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com (mail-vx0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y2si1121362vdt.3.2012.02.23.20.34.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:34:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.169; Received: by vcbf13 with SMTP id f13so1527293vcb.28 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:34:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 10.52.30.98 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.30.98; Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.30.98]) by 10.52.30.98 with SMTP id r2mr362430vdh.8.1330058069218 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:34:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.30.98 with SMTP id r2mr298457vdh.8.1330058069161; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:34:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.34.136 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:34:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <40fec229-5863-449d-aa76-0ec6f2e6f34d@x19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> References: <40fec229-5863-449d-aa76-0ec6f2e6f34d@x19g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> From: Jacob Errington Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:34:09 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Hanseatic marzipan fu'ivla? To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3079b89ebe37ea04b9ae46b3 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --20cf3079b89ebe37ea04b9ae46b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable They both seem good to me, but I'm very fu'ivla-liberal, so I'm not a good reference for this. I'd suggest using type-3 variations of these, to be understood fully without need of the vlaste: {kulnrxa'anze} and {cidjrmarsipane} As the conversation progresses and the words are reused though, shift to the type-4, as they're shorter. In my opinion, fu'ivla should have as little places as possible, and when it comes to food fu'ivla, a structure such as "x1 is/contains [food] of type x2" always seems sufficient. Does marzipan really contain elements that merit places all to themselves? An "of type" place is vague enough to allow the speaker to mean whatever he or she wants with it, either by specifying a named type with [la] and friends, or using abstract raising with [zo'e pe] on tags or regular sumti. For instance: {lo [cidjr]marsipane be zo'e pe secau lo naltitla ri'orsmela} "Marzipan (made) without bitter almonds", where [ri'orsmela] can be replaced with an alternative not using the experimental gismu [smela], such as [crino zei rutrprunu] or [ri'onrutrprunu] or whatever. Of course, one could make a lujvo for marzipan, but if shortness is a requirement, fu'ivla are the way to go. I'd propose: [smelyjtitla], if we're accepting [smela] or [ci'onrutrprunu'ytitla] if we're accepting a BPFK proposal concering fu'ivla rafsi or [crino zei rutrprunu zei titla] if we're limiting ourselves to CLL Lojban. mi'e la tsani mu'o On 23 February 2012 16:23, iesk wrote: > coi ro do > > ni'o pe'i da sidbo lo pe'i diklo vajni gi'e na'e ca se valsi befi la > lojban. > > .i pei =C2=ABlu mi ca zvati lo za'e xa'anze tcadu li'u=C2=BB .i pei =C2= =ABlu mi no'e > nelci lo za'e marsipane li'u=C2=BB > > I give up and continue in English=E2=80=A6 :( > > Where I live there are two locally important (as in: moderately > frequent, but prestigious use, also in compounds and names =E2=86=92 word= s > should be short and catchy) concepts for which there seem to be no > Lojban words so far. Is this what I should/could propose type-4 > fu'ivla for? If so, I need some help. > > ? xa'anze: x1 reflects Hanseatic culture/community/whatever in aspect > x2 > ? marsipane: x1 is/contains marzipan =E2=80=A6 ??? of sort x2 ??? made fr= om x2 > % almond mass and x3 % sugar ??? =E2=80=A6 oh my, I=E2=80=99m not a pastr= ymaker, but > there are different types and qualities of marzipan, so something like > that should probably be in the place structure of such a word > > (If I got it right, the expected thing would be to go through the > stages of type-1 to eventually type-4 fu'ivla as the Lojban community > feels the need. The problem being, considering the popularity of > Lojban around here, I would have to do that talking to myself. :/ And > talking to myself in type-1 fu'ivla sucks.) > > Comments anyone? Thanks in advance! > > mi'e iesk > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --20cf3079b89ebe37ea04b9ae46b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable They both seem good to me, but I'm very fu'ivla-liberal, so I'm= not a good reference for this.
I'd suggest using type-3 variations= of these, to be understood fully without need of the vlaste:
{kulnrxa'anze} and {cidjrmarsipane}
As the conversation progr= esses and the words are reused though, shift to the type-4, as they're = shorter.

In my opinion, fu'ivla should have as= little places as possible, and when it comes to food fu'ivla, a struct= ure such as "x1 is/contains [food] of type x2" always seems suffi= cient. Does marzipan really contain elements that merit places all to thems= elves? An "of type" place is vague enough to allow the speaker to= mean whatever he or she wants with it, either by specifying a named type w= ith [la] and friends, or using abstract raising with [zo'e pe] on tags = or regular sumti. For instance:
{lo [cidjr]marsipane be zo'e pe secau lo naltitla ri'orsmela} = "Marzipan (made) without bitter almonds", where [ri'orsmela] = can be replaced with an alternative not using the experimental gismu [smela= ], such as [crino zei rutrprunu] or [ri'onrutrprunu] or whatever.

Of course, one could make a lujvo for marzipan, but if = shortness is a requirement, fu'ivla are the way to go. I'd propose:= [smelyjtitla], if we're accepting [smela] or [ci'onrutrprunu'y= titla] if we're accepting a BPFK proposal concering fu'ivla rafsi o= r [crino zei rutrprunu zei titla] if we're limiting ourselves to CLL Lo= jban.

mi'e la tsani mu'o

On 23 February 2012 16:23, iesk <pa.fae@gmx.de> wrote:
coi ro do

ni'o pe'i da sidbo lo pe'i diklo vajni gi'e na'e ca se = valsi befi la
lojban.

.i pei =C2=ABlu mi ca zvati lo za'e xa'anze tcadu li'u=C2=BB .i= pei =C2=ABlu mi no'e
nelci lo za'e marsipane li'u=C2=BB

I give up and continue in English=E2=80=A6 :(

Where I live there are two locally important (as in: moderately
frequent, but prestigious use, also in compounds and names =E2=86=92 words<= br> should be short and catchy) concepts for which there seem to be no
Lojban words so far. Is this what I should/could propose type-4
fu'ivla for? If so, I need some help.

? xa'anze: x1 reflects Hanseatic culture/community/whatever in aspect x2
? marsipane: x1 is/contains marzipan =E2=80=A6 ??? of sort x2 ??? made from= x2
% almond mass and x3 % sugar ??? =E2=80=A6 oh my, I=E2=80=99m not a pastrym= aker, but
there are different types and qualities of marzipan, so something like
that should probably be in the place structure of such a word

(If I got it right, the expected thing would be to go through the
stages of type-1 to eventually type-4 fu'ivla as the Lojban community feels the need. The problem being, considering the popularity of
Lojban around here, I would have to do that talking to myself. :/ And
talking to myself in type-1 fu'ivla sucks.)

Comments anyone? Thanks in advance!

mi'e iesk

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--20cf3079b89ebe37ea04b9ae46b3--