Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:64575)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCK7Yk5CUCxCen576BBoE4-_qUw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1S0v8p-0007v4-6m; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:24:59 -0800
Received: by dadv40 with SMTP id v40sf2129395dad.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:24:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=bTadIP18E0qp0KpQitPfH7UNuR0WFTmRESD6rm5MBWg=;
        b=4tH8fZKN33DamAj4ovvTHcWXSOckD2U8YcO9X7bwTNwjhNsHV7nP3Vwbo/MKrkhax9
         7+kItslCr+rLzDTP9MTwCkPiwy4aMN4nqJK/1q3kcbseheE6F3jgZjtNSwTkqx+24JKJ
         8jH++FZVBem+DEhLI+pi+SgOv5nxFVofopTQA=
Received: by 10.236.177.101 with SMTP id c65mr151168yhm.19.1330089886498;
        Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:24:46 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.101.10.12 with SMTP id n12ls2500893ani.5.gmail; Fri, 24 Feb
 2012 05:24:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.245.28 with SMTP id s28mr925678anh.6.1330089884430;
        Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.245.28 with SMTP id s28mr925677anh.6.1330089884414;
        Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-gx0-f170.google.com (mail-gx0-f170.google.com [209.85.161.170])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z8si1379791ano.2.2012.02.24.05.24.44
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.170;
Received: by ggki2 with SMTP id i2so1920774ggk.1
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 10.50.15.129 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.15.129;
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.15.129])
        by 10.50.15.129 with SMTP id x1mr2862613igc.14.1330089884298 (num_hops = 1);
        Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:24:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.15.129 with SMTP id x1mr2303551igc.14.1330089884265; Fri,
 24 Feb 2012 05:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.133.73 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:24:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8249158.105.1330078848621.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjn6>
References: <8249158.105.1330078848621.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjn6>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:24:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAQ0imOKnda4ocNn5fy7BauEYyHMLo8faqxMYbriRL7bBCon7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] An opinion against Lojban/Loglan
From: Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: rdentato@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.170 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=rdentato@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

I stopped reading at:

> I don't consider either Loglan or Lojban viable auxlangs.

Neither do I, so I can't see how this could support any furhter argument.

Anyway, I quickly browsed the rest.

If I understood correctly, the author would have created a spin-off of
Loglan in a different way and his way would have been much better than
Lojban.

The problem is that he didn't.

I'll be very interested in his effort, I hope he will let us know when
he has completed his equivlent of CLL so we can compare the two
languages.

remod

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.