Received: from mail-fa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]:42697)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCMGclZyxExDcp576BBoEretipA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1S0vYP-0008Dh-H7; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:51:27 -0800
Received: by fabs1 with SMTP id s1sf2087023fab.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:51:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=mcZKBDmr4g1ow8GfgdSilXqtppsS0h6N4L2dnh4zn9U=;
        b=oP5oRqUUQbMhqcRIKzFQWK/e8lBaoEEk+sporoSOwOujtuc25GwLs+yqqg7MQx0JiB
         C452zyEKA3wk2R9Hse4XszzSvbvwMPdAKorqwrGBs2EkuDoRCHj2cr+UgsAIuZoEqFEH
         r8ZZJVF8b3aXVCFU/uVsSIpwLQVtuUP/mlMSY=
Received: by 10.216.138.130 with SMTP id a2mr112550wej.31.1330090972829;
        Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:42:52 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.216.81.69 with SMTP id l47ls5029479wee.3.gmail; Fri, 24 Feb
 2012 05:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.8.35 with SMTP id o3mr214351wia.4.1330090971475;
        Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.8.35 with SMTP id o3mr214350wia.4.1330090971467;
        Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (mail-ww0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y10si735182wiy.3.2012.02.24.05.42.51
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.51;
Received: by mail-ww0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fm10so308973wgb.32
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 10.180.107.2 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.107.2;
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.107.2])
        by 10.180.107.2 with SMTP id gy2mr5259978wib.12.1330090971456 (num_hops = 1);
        Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:42:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.107.2 with SMTP id gy2mr4236061wib.12.1330090971382; Fri,
 24 Feb 2012 05:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.143.197 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 05:42:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAQ0imOKnda4ocNn5fy7BauEYyHMLo8faqxMYbriRL7bBCon7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8249158.105.1330078848621.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjn6>
	<CAAQ0imOKnda4ocNn5fy7BauEYyHMLo8faqxMYbriRL7bBCon7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:42:51 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGO2uON+LTJq8YpkirM2YNnXciH9Gxu9vYDreZyotW4xENk6-w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] An opinion against Lojban/Loglan
From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: escaaape@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=escaaape@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

It is sad you didn't pay attention to his post, there are a few valid remarks.

I especially retain this one :

natlangs are based on "linguistic predicates", Lojban on "logical
predicates".  Linguistic predicates come in more naturally and allow
more semantic flexibility.

2012/2/24, Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>:
> I stopped reading at:
>
>> I don't consider either Loglan or Lojban viable auxlangs.
>
> Neither do I, so I can't see how this could support any furhter argument.
>
> Anyway, I quickly browsed the rest.
>
> If I understood correctly, the author would have created a spin-off of
> Loglan in a different way and his way would have been much better than
> Lojban.
>
> The problem is that he didn't.
>
> I'll be very interested in his effort, I hope he will let us know when
> he has completed his equivlent of CLL so we can compare the two
> languages.
>
> remod
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.