Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:60993) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S0yeN-0002YG-2F; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:09:47 -0800 Received: by ggnm2 with SMTP id m2sf2327748ggn.16 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:09:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=wekad0fnV86L41BsIS6NF06e8Rri8fr+Ma4T8Na2PGQ=; b=0N2a34HuZd+FXNuiTx665kT0rUgtKKeYrQaTbr9dKOHqxjk/KBEmzHWnNPzPOcz1y5 WnfrcCA46yIFP+8qeofWUnUc+rkl45N/BoN57CV4DKGgzqcT/kYUen7LI9oPqIeSgGVZ hgNjMgErhv8Y0nn0JUDWNV93QSppZK4sorPcI= Received: by 10.68.217.129 with SMTP id oy1mr743434pbc.8.1330103374075; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:09:34 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.216.162 with SMTP id or2ls10067751pbc.8.gmail; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr2947007pbv.0.1330103373493; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr2947006pbv.0.1330103373478; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pw0-f71.google.com (mail-pw0-f71.google.com [209.85.160.71]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6si6865087pbg.2.2012.02.24.09.09.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.71 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.71; Received: by pbcwz7 with SMTP id wz7so4755489pbc.2 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 10.68.218.166 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.218.166; Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.218.166]) by 10.68.218.166 with SMTP id ph6mr69690pbc.5.1330103373444 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:09:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.218.166 with SMTP id ph6mr46781pbc.5.1330103373286; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:09:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <047d7b2edf9d144f8e04b9b8d3c7@google.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:09:33 +0000 Subject: Re: Re: [lojban] An opinion against Lojban/Loglan From: rdentato@gmail.com To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rdentato@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rdentato@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.71 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rdentato@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2edf9d144f8204b9b8d3c4 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7b2edf9d144f8204b9b8d3c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Il giorno , Escape Landsome ha scritto: > It is sad you didn't pay attention to his post, there are a few valid > remarks. I'm sure there are. My point is that is very easy to criticize, it's much more difficult to create something comparable to Lojban. For example, I would llike to have cmevla being also brivla, but I'm not sure about the impact on the rest of the langage and I'm not knowlegable enough to try to push. I'll love to see this child of Loglan when it will see the light, but this doesn't mean I can't dismiss easy criticism from someone who just claim that he "could do it better". remo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --047d7b2edf9d144f8204b9b8d3c4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Il giorno , Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>= ; It is sad you didn't pay attention to his post, there are a few valid= remarks.

I'm sure there are.

My point is that is= very easy to criticize, it's much more difficult to create something c= omparable to Lojban.

For example, I would llike to have cmevla b= eing also brivla, but I'm not sure about the impact on the rest of the = langage and I'm not knowlegable enough to try to push.

I'= ;ll love to see this child of Loglan when it will see the light, but this d= oesn't mean I can't dismiss easy criticism from someone who just cl= aim that he "could do it better".

remo

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--047d7b2edf9d144f8204b9b8d3c4--