Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:43827) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S16W3-0000M8-Ga; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:45 -0800 Received: by ghbg22 with SMTP id g22sf2642308ghb.16 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lojban+bncCOib25n_BhDp9KD6BBoE-YvLZQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.50.11.226 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.11.226; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lojban+bncCOib25n_BhDp9KD6BBoE-YvLZQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.50.11.226 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lojban+bncCOib25n_BhDp9KD6BBoE-YvLZQ@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=lojban+bncCOib25n_BhDp9KD6BBoE-YvLZQ@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.11.226]) by 10.50.11.226 with SMTP id t2mr176359igb.0.1330133612849 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:sender :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=ntX9jkbaiSYiWWHaAZUZdovDKiK+QyUrH16yrZcr0tg=; b=yqkToiwoCBfYusyotg+cz7Ah7qoC5phDnJhTNjYI3wI5zxZp4/cGd/hSkJfYW9ZL+Y d2X3ktTOenJ/DXmJN6O8hwzyKxPRZ4mK9iQG798flZ5fmPwABwZSKKAz37dCFZ9sYQhq BRPVuWfb2zk9g/2DVBzIaPXiAa46yHnTmFcu4= Received: by 10.50.11.226 with SMTP id t2mr36848igb.0.1330133609773; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:29 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.155.232 with SMTP id vz8ls2509717igb.1.canary; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.43.53.73 with SMTP id vp9mr2113027icb.0.1330133608623; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.43.53.73 with SMTP id vp9mr2113026icb.0.1330133608611; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gv1si2011102igb.3.2012.02.24.17.33.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.174; Received: by obcva7 with SMTP id va7so3530712obc.19 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 10.60.12.72 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.12.72; Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.12.72]) by 10.60.12.72 with SMTP id w8mr1701575oeb.31.1330133608314 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.12.72 with SMTP id w8mr1489650oeb.31.1330133608258; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.34.129 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <15708505.1.1330130879554.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbciw6> References: <8249158.105.1330078848621.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjn6> <201202240849.09497.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4F47C325.8030902@gmx.de> <15708505.1.1330130879554.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbciw6> From: ".arpis." Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:33:08 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] An opinion against Lojban/Loglan To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / I think that his complaint (at least if he's complaining about something reasonable) is that {lo clacizyjvovau} (to borrow a term from the nomic game I keep meaning to resurrect but lack the time) don't have a well defined place structure. On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:47 PM, la .lindar. wrote: > He also seems to think there's no rule for making compound words. There is, in fact, a very rigid system that can be unambiguously disassembled into component words. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/yVVA49FlbxsJ. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .arpis. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.