Received: from mail-bk0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:35976) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S3TlZ-0003bD-0k; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:47:33 -0800 Received: by bkcjg9 with SMTP id jg9sf1699179bkc.16 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:47:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lojban+bncCJbznvHdFRD2usP6BBoEQdW8cQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.204.128.141 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.204.128.141; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lojban+bncCJbznvHdFRD2usP6BBoEQdW8cQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.204.128.141 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lojban+bncCJbznvHdFRD2usP6BBoEQdW8cQ@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=lojban+bncCJbznvHdFRD2usP6BBoEQdW8cQ@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.204.128.141]) by 10.204.128.141 with SMTP id k13mr3031443bks.13.1330699641184 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:47:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Tljl4/mPV9VkEXm7hEWMP+jT/eE+7xQQlWkCtKHPuKo=; b=pToOnuc4RQVRzkaOqNFNQQ1r2P45gm40Hf6YFbHShILYIdjINuidXx0CvuEYlCV4g+ Nz8hAMjkDYeStAu/zOFARA5U84gNa2Nm2l/p2FssNjfI15rzxb3ftskDE0Up4eo66xh+ QW+ptKsAwnWctWCRo1vBRAAiG5mvI2leP/Wnw= Received: by 10.204.128.141 with SMTP id k13mr885675bks.13.1330699638574; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:47:18 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.45.87 with SMTP id d23ls3604916bkf.2.gmail; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:47:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.133.213 with SMTP id g21mr838502bkt.3.1330699637582; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:47:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.133.213 with SMTP id g21mr838501bkt.3.1330699637550; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:47:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20si6449467bko.3.2012.03.02.06.47.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:47:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.44; Received: by lagj5 with SMTP id j5so3448178lag.17 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:47:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 10.112.42.35 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.42.35; Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.42.35]) by 10.112.42.35 with SMTP id k3mr4873668lbl.98.1330699637219 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:47:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.42.35 with SMTP id k3mr3987160lbl.98.1330699637125; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:47:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.67.41 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:46:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <30903050.276.1330692193136.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynca15> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:46:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Using Lojban in 'very' defined contexts (eg. maths) To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b390f7b4e2c71d304ba43a7c6 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --485b390f7b4e2c71d304ba43a7c6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This has sort of come up before. I agree that bare numerals seem harder to use than numbers that mark the value at each place. When I was in the army (too few years ago) a man once directed us in physical training exercises saying "one five" for 15. I found it irritating. What do the accomplished speakers here think? stevo On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Escape Landsome wrote: > This is a good question. > > I wonder if "pa-ci-re" is an efficient way to say "132". It may be > good for a computer, which "understands" the things in a syntactic > way, but I would say that humans prefer the semantic-pragmatic way > which is found in "one-hundred, three-tens, two-units", (even if tens > is said "-ty" and units is implicit), because there's the positional > meaning of 1 that means "one hundred" imported in the language. > > People tend to think pragmatically/semantically, not only along > syntax, as, perhaps, Lojban does a little too much ? > > 2012/3/2, M.Nael : > > Would this work? > > My native language is Arabic yet I've studied Mathematics since age 3 in > > English... Arabic has the disadvantage of having 'too-many syllables' as > > opposed to (usually) 1-2 in English. > > This is most visible in numbers. Arabic 'One' is 'wa?id' | 'Two' is > > 'i0na:n' | 'Three' is '0la:0ah' and so on. > > Even with English being more efficient here (and I've grown to use its > > number-words in mental calculation), I still find myself saying > > 'three-thousand bla-bla-hundred), ...etc. Lojban number-words should make > > up for this, thus: > > My question is: how much would training for 'pa-ci-re' instead of > > 'one-hundred, thirty-two' etc... be beneficial for my mental > calculations? > > And if I decided to extend this to the whole of my mathematical thinking? > > Has anyone tried to use *just* the maths (and generally science-part) of > > Lojban? > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "lojban" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/J2Orr4yu-lUJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --485b390f7b4e2c71d304ba43a7c6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This has sort of come up before. I agree that bare numerals seem harder to = use than numbers that mark the value at each place. When I was in the army = (too few years ago) a man once directed us in physical training exercises s= aying "one five" for 15. I found it irritating.=A0
What do the accomplished speakers here think?=A0

s= tevo

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Esca= pe Landsome <esc= aaape@gmail.com> wrote:
This is a good question.

I wonder if "pa-ci-re" is an efficient way to say "132"= . =A0 It may be
good for a computer, which "understands" the things in a syntacti= c
way, but I would say that humans prefer the semantic-pragmatic way
which is found in "one-hundred, three-tens, two-units", (even if = tens
is said "-ty" and units is implicit), because there's the pos= itional
meaning of 1 that means "one hundred" imported in the language.
People tend to think pragmatically/semantically, not only along
syntax, as, perhaps, Lojban does a little too much ?

2012/3/2, M.Nael <muhammad.na= el@gmail.com>:
> Would this work?
> My native language is Arabic yet I've studied Mathematics since ag= e 3 in
> English... Arabic has the disadvantage of having 'too-many syllabl= es' as
> opposed to (usually) 1-2 in English.
> This is most visible in numbers. Arabic 'One' is 'wa?id= 9; | 'Two' is
> 'i0na:n' | 'Three' is '0la:0ah' and so on.
> Even with English being more efficient here (and I've grown to use= its
> number-words in mental calculation), I still find myself saying
> 'three-thousand bla-bla-hundred), ...etc. Lojban number-words shou= ld make
> up for this, thus:
> My question is: how much would training for 'pa-ci-re' instead= of
> 'one-hundred, thirty-two' etc... be beneficial for my mental c= alculations?
> And if I decided to extend this to the whole of my mathematical thinki= ng?
> Has anyone tried to use *just* the maths (and generally science-= part) of
> Lojban?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups
> "lojban" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/J2Orr4yu-lUJ. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubs= cribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
>
>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--485b390f7b4e2c71d304ba43a7c6--