Received: from mail-gy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:34691)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxD--MT6BBoE20BjfA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1S3a5v-0008Sl-JZ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:33:00 -0800
Received: by ghbf14 with SMTP id f14sf1776328ghb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:32:49 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxD--MT6BBoE20BjfA@googlegroups.com designates 10.236.116.197 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.116.197;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxD--MT6BBoE20BjfA@googlegroups.com designates 10.236.116.197 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxD--MT6BBoE20BjfA@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=lojban+bncCNTPpI2KGxD--MT6BBoE20BjfA@googlegroups.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.116.197])
        by 10.236.116.197 with SMTP id g45mr4845617yhh.0.1330723969075 (num_hops = 1);
        Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:32:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references
         :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=liv7CG2ZO+FUDBzPVoXbRXGoWPGfQbipqZaf6g2z1pQ=;
        b=k34fnevTDTDPkSqGoV7bccCVJZVd8eowqJhO//w9jUqMuD/BvkdYpVpMZQhSjCuCAK
         8MpAfqGOl/sCM/dJa6IaIiMIEW+KWFEBe/mIuakUclSDGPHG1qh6WEy++It9U+eUaj4A
         qsEVrSKEzomh8ZI0zAJfbdlp/IH8PvTLZIXO0=
Received: by 10.236.116.197 with SMTP id g45mr1402576yhh.0.1330723966404;
        Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:32:46 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.101.206.37 with SMTP id i37ls2566627anq.0.gmail; Fri, 02 Mar
 2012 13:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.215.1 with SMTP id n1mr4129663ang.15.1330723965108;
        Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.215.1 with SMTP id n1mr4129660ang.15.1330723965094;
        Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chausie (cpe-069-132-101-103.carolina.res.rr.com. [69.132.101.103])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e44si3748059yhk.0.2012.03.02.13.32.44;
        Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.132.101.103 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=69.132.101.103;
Received: from darner.ixazon.lan (darner.ixazon.lan [192.168.7.5])
	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 198A521827
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri,  2 Mar 2012 16:32:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] ka'e/kakne & mapti/sarxe
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:32:35 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (DragonFly/3.1-DEVELOPMENT; KDE/4.5.5; i386; ; )
References: <f46d044287ca46463f04b94dcd1a@google.com> <CAKOEKkRvn2XA5fC2rCcWNzdpZ7Evx950p7Jb3mUdmTAuU7zF-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CALMa68pGiEk+9D5SRM1xDWT3_d7w9mYUhejDyVv18H81VNgUNQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALMa68pGiEk+9D5SRM1xDWT3_d7w9mYUhejDyVv18H81VNgUNQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <201203021632.36141.phma@phma.optus.nu>
X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 69.132.101.103 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for
 domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Friday, March 02, 2012 15:20:59 Felipe Gon=E7alves Assis wrote:
> On 2 March 2012 14:48, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And I do internally interpret nu
> > abstractions as having a (possibly elided) ce'u in them (in other
> > words, since they are in the same selma'o as ka, I don't see any
> > reason to treat one different than the other in the "parts" they
> > contain)
>=20
> They are also in the same selma'o as {du'u}. There is no implicit
> or explicit {ce'u} in du'u-clauses.

Being in the same selma'o means only that, if you have a syntactically vali=
d=20
sentence with "du'u" in it, you can substitute "nu" for "du'u" and get a=20
syntactically valid sentence, and vice versa. It doesn't imply anything abo=
ut=20
implicit "ce'u". Similarly, "zi'o" is in the same selma'o as "ko'a", but=20
"zi'o" does not have a referent; and "du" and "co'e" are in the same selma'=
o=20
as "go'i", but it makes no sense to use "ra'o" with them. A sentence can be=
=20
syntactically valid yet uninterpretable. le mlatu pe naku goi zi'o cu co'e=
=20
ra'o lo cipni te.u lo ratcu.

Pierre
--=20
sei do'anai mi'a djuno puze'e noroi nalselganse srera

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.