Received: from mail-bk0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:58505) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S4b2r-0005YU-8m; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:45:59 -0800 Received: by bkcjg9 with SMTP id jg9sf4166153bkc.16 for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:45:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=PdoOAkbmaaoaadm84cO/a/qM4oN52NbZUb5iiD6XcqY=; b=SAn8lO7tOFtDwyn1pOMgiqw/+nRaWuvFa68V7b/53Bzlr8HkOivSgUtuq83rAVAFpC DEnDct5dHgF+t8QTnLPRcx1uFavD9B1PeoQVbsuzYqWF2JGuFceaTu+BeQQ3Oc36mxed XrD5kjC9WNhGssZjS6gzMbP9d1W61koGJxC/A= Received: by 10.180.105.69 with SMTP id gk5mr1966579wib.0.1330965946735; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:45:46 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.213.2.69 with SMTP id 5ls2826388ebi.3.gmail; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:45:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.156.210 with SMTP id y18mr1639811bkw.7.1330965944613; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:45:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.156.210 with SMTP id y18mr1639810bkw.7.1330965944577; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:45:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l17si18476457bkb.1.2012.03.05.08.45.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:45:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.46; Received: by lahj13 with SMTP id j13so4846586lah.19 for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:45:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 10.152.147.202 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.152.147.202; Received: from mr.google.com ([10.152.147.202]) by 10.152.147.202 with SMTP id tm10mr20752147lab.49.1330965944251 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:45:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.147.202 with SMTP id tm10mr17011107lab.49.1330965944159; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:45:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.36.1 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:45:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <30903050.276.1330692193136.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynca15> <1330960051.37451.YahooMailNeo@web81307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: MorphemeAddict Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:45:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Using Lojban in 'very' defined contexts (eg. maths) To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2353114f4d7d04ba81a8c9 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8f2353114f4d7d04ba81a8c9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable English is not duodecimal at all today. Nor was it in the past. Despite all the words like 'dozen', 'gross'. stevo On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Sid wrote: > "Eleven" and "twelve" come from Proto-Germanic *ainlif and *twalif, > which are in turn derived from phrases that were literally "one left" > and "two left". But, yeah, I goofed; English has special words for 11 > and 12 because its ancestors were duodecimal, but it's not fully > duodecimal today. > > On 5 March 2012 20:37, John E Clifford wrote: > > Nope, decimal. "Eleven" and "twelve" just mean "one over" and "two > over" -- > > over ten, of course > > SWH is notoriously ill-defined and most of the formulations miss crucia= l > > parts of the original. That being said, the summation of acceptance is > > about right. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Sid > > To: lojban@googlegroups.com > > Sent: Monday, March 5, 2012 6:14 AM > > Subject: Re: [lojban] Using Lojban in 'very' defined contexts (eg. math= s) > > > > doi la'oi Fr=F6jd > > > > English uses eleven and twelve because it's base-12, not base-10. > > > > doi lai ry Muhammad an-Nuqrashi ry > > > > Sapir-Whorf has two variants -- one is whether language *limits* what > > you can think, and the other is if language merely influences how you > > think. The former is near completely disproven, the latter is fairly > > well accepted. > > > > mi'e cntr > > > > On 3 March 2012 20:08, Sebastian Fr=F6jd wrote: > >> I've been trying to find the reference of what I've been reading, but = I > >> haven't found it yet. From what I remember, it was something about > chinese > >> count like eight-nine-ten-tenone-tentwo etc, instead of the illogical > >> eleven-twelve etc. So that could be the cause why chinese children gra= sp > >> the > >> base-10 position system earlier. Unfortunately I have no reference to > this > >> research at the moment. But maybe this could be a start?: > >> > >> "Other experiments have demonstrated differences in how Westerners and > >> East > >> Asians think about objects (Iwao & Gentner, 1997), numbers (Lucy & > >> Gaskins, > >> 1997), and space (Levinson, 1996) and how processing numbers when doin= g > >> arithmetic problems is related to language differences between > >> Chinese-speaking and English-speaking participants (Tang et al., 2006)= " > >> > >> mu'omi'e jongausib > >> > >> > >> 2012/3/3 Muhammad an-Nuqrashi > >>> > >>> I've read a bit in Mandarin and its sisters but I never got as far as > >>> numerals; mostly stopped at the Wikipedia page! > >>> +Sebastian, I'd really, really^99, love to see a paper about that > >>> research. I've been fascinated with SW-H until they left me no eviden= ce > >>> it > >>> could exist... If the research is 'that' positive, I might take out a > few > >>> old projects from my safe! > >>> > >>>> > >>>> From my meager experience, the lojban system is nicer than English f= or > >>>> thinking of _numbers_, as long as _quantity_ doesn't matter. That's > >>>> okay, though, because any digit based system is poor at expressing > >>>> quantity at scale. > >>> > >>> > >>> +.arpis. , So that's a 'go-for-it' recommendation? > >>> > >>> PS. I'm sorry for late replies, those I've made and those yet to come= , > >>> but > >>> my connection is quite unstable >.< > >>> > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >>> "lojban" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >>> For more options, visit this group at > >>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "lojban" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou= ps > > "lojban" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > > > > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou= ps > > "lojban" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --e89a8f2353114f4d7d04ba81a8c9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable English is not duodecimal at all today. Nor was it in the past. Despite all= the words like 'dozen', 'gross'.=A0

ste= vo

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Sid <= span dir=3D"ltr"><cntrational@g= mail.com> wrote:
"Eleven" and "twelve" co= me from Proto-Germanic *ainlif and *twalif,
which are in turn derived from phrases that were literally "one left&q= uot;
and "two left". But, yeah, I goofed; English has special words fo= r 11
and 12 because its ancestors were duodecimal, but it's not fully
duodecimal today.

On 5 March 2012 20:37, John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Nope, decimal.=A0 "Eleven" and "twelve" just mean = "one over" and "two over" --
> over ten, of course
> SWH is notoriously ill-defined and most of the formulations miss cruci= al
> parts of the original.=A0 That being said, the summation of acceptance= is
> about right.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sid <cntrational@gma= il.com>
> To: lojban@googlegroups.com=
> Sent: Monday, March 5, 2012 6:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [lojban] Using Lojban in 'very' defined contexts = (eg. maths)
>
> doi la'oi Fr=F6jd
>
> English uses eleven and twelve because it's base-12, not base-10.<= br> >
> doi lai ry Muhammad an-Nuqrashi ry
>
> Sapir-Whorf has two variants -- one is whether language *limits* what<= br> > you can think, and the other is if language merely influences how you<= br> > think. The former is near completely disproven, the latter is fairly > well accepted.
>
> mi'e cntr
>
> On 3 March 2012 20:08, Sebastian Fr=F6jd <so.cool.ogi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've been trying to find the reference of what I've been r= eading, but I
>> haven't found it yet. From what I remember, it was something a= bout chinese
>> count like eight-nine-ten-tenone-tentwo etc, instead of the illogi= cal
>> eleven-twelve etc. So that could be the cause why chinese children= grasp
>> the
>> base-10 position system earlier. Unfortunately I have no reference= to this
>> research at the moment. But maybe this could be a start?:
>>
>> "Other experiments have demonstrated differences in how Weste= rners and
>> East
>> Asians think about objects (Iwao & Gentner, 1997), numbers (Lu= cy &
>> Gaskins,
>> 1997), and space (Levinson, 1996) and how processing numbers when = doing
>> arithmetic problems is related to language differences between
>> Chinese-speaking and English-speaking participants (Tang et al., 2= 006)"
>>
>> mu'omi'e jongausib
>>
>>
>> 2012/3/3 Muhammad an-Nuqrashi <muhammad.nael@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I've read a bit in Mandarin and its sisters but I never go= t as far as
>>> numerals; mostly stopped at the Wikipedia page!
>>> +Sebastian, I'd really, really^99,=A0love to see a paper a= bout that
>>> research. I've been fascinated with SW-H until they left m= e no evidence
>>> it
>>> could exist... If the research is 'that' positive, I m= ight take out a few
>>> old projects from my safe!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> From my meager experience, the lojban system is nicer than= English for
>>>> thinking of _numbers_, as long as _quantity_ doesn't m= atter. That's
>>>> okay, though, because any digit based system is poor at ex= pressing
>>>> quantity at scale.
>>>
>>>
>>> +.arpis. , So that's a 'go-for-it' recommendation?=
>>>
>>> PS. I'm sorry for late replies, those I've made and th= ose yet to come,
>>> but
>>> my connection is quite unstable >.<
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go= ogle Groups
>>> "lojban" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> lojba= n+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google= Groups
>> "lojban" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> lojban+un= subscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubs= cribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro= ups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+unsubs= cribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8f2353114f4d7d04ba81a8c9--