Received: from mail-fa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]:53114) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S4eER-0007Tl-2B; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:10:10 -0800 Received: by fabs1 with SMTP id s1sf4457661fab.16 for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:09:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhCTu9T6BBoEgvPbtw@googlegroups.com designates 10.204.10.87 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.204.10.87; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhCTu9T6BBoEgvPbtw@googlegroups.com designates 10.204.10.87 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhCTu9T6BBoEgvPbtw@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=lojban+bncCMHEmaCOBhCTu9T6BBoEgvPbtw@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.204.10.87]) by 10.204.10.87 with SMTP id o23mr1546561bko.3.1330978199441 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:09:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=TOq4pCYVCnD1EOsV611DgBCdOJ9TuqGcyUKgGuxVmy4=; b=TGxDJ9uqsYDnjyLYZx87BCJul4cy3imHl7F460a8FwUCyKKta6KLLinh2meDO3ScC7 Ng1PGnphF6FVuGzJ22A1Kxtf2YRyqIh1heagEb6IeHfqJWdE6sn2pjgbHHxkJxYBPPYZ hSJbDt1RDxSpCOh+WwcaukXOiQYBAVXPJeG24= Received: by 10.204.10.87 with SMTP id o23mr464021bko.3.1330978195615; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:09:55 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.128.220 with SMTP id l28ls1947485bks.8.gmail; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:09:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.131.75 with SMTP id w11mr1706510bks.0.1330978193596; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:09:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.131.75 with SMTP id w11mr1706509bks.0.1330978193520; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:09:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com [209.85.215.46]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20si19035130bko.3.2012.03.05.12.09.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:09:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.46; Received: by lahj13 with SMTP id j13so5062386lah.19 for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:09:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 10.112.86.198 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.86.198; Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.86.198]) by 10.112.86.198 with SMTP id r6mr10262649lbz.53.1330978193155 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:09:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.86.198 with SMTP id r6mr8425407lbz.53.1330978193013; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:09:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.148.225 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:09:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7853015.1110.1330974066635.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbze11> References: <201203050232.47562.phma@phma.optus.nu> <7853015.1110.1330974066635.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbze11> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:09:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] What's the deal with me'ispe and bunspe? From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554d6dc65fa8304ba848286 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec554d6dc65fa8304ba848286 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:01 PM, vruxir wrote: > ...I would assume, by my understanding of tanru where the first element > modifies the second, that the most basic definitions of me'ispe and bunspe > are: > lujvo are not tanru. lujvo are defined words, said definition determined by the creator, and do not necessarily have anything to do with the meaning of any tanru. > lo me'ispe: sister kind-of spouse -> sister's spouse (gender not > specified, so not necessarily brother- or sister-in-law) > (shorthand for lo speni be lo mensi) > a "sister kind-of spouse" is a spouse who is a sister, not a sister of a spouse. By my definition, {zo me'ispe smuni lu ko'a mensi ko'e lonu speni lu} = "x1 is the sister of x2 by the bond of marriage; x1 is x2's sister-in-law", where {lonu speni} is short for {ko'a goi lo ninmu .onai lo ko'a tunba cu speni lo ko'e tunba .onai ko'e .ije ko'a na speni ko'e} lo bunspe: brother kind-of spouse -> brother's spouse (gender not > specified, so not necessarily brother- or sister-in-law) > (shorthand for lo speni be lo bruna) > > See above. > > And then: > > lo speme'i: spouse kind-of sister -> spouse's sister (one kind of > sister-in-law) > (shorthand for lo mensi be lo speni) > > lo spebu'a: spouse kind-of brother -> spouse's brother (one kind of > brother-in-law) > (shorthand for lo bruna be lo speni) > > > I do think the current me'ispe and bunspe definitions are misleading in > their use of gendered terms, using English terms with complex and ambiguous > meanings. > In English, an in-law is someone who is related to a person because of the in-law's family is married to someone of the other person's family. The exact relationship to the person is the same relationship they have to the married member of their own family plus "in-law", with the single exception that the married couple are not siblings-in-law to each other. The difference between a sister by birth and a sister by marriage (and by extension, all birth vs. in-law relationships) is the bond. For example, A is a sister-by-birth to C, B is a sister-by-marriage: .abu mensi cy. lodu'u ra .e ri mintu se rirni by. mensi cy. lodu'u lo by. se lanzu cu speni lo cy. se lanzu > If the definition is looking for search hits, then: > > Searching for "brother-in-law" should bring up me'ispe, bunspe, spebu'a > and terspebu'a > Searching for "sister-in-law" should bring up me'ispe, bunspe, speme'i and > terspeme'i > Searching for "in-law" should bring up... lots of things. > > > mu'o > > > On Monday, March 5, 2012 3:30:58 AM UTC-5, aionys wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, March 04, 2012 23:48:44 Jonathan Jones wrote: >>> > Why is bunspe defined as sister-in-law and me'ispe is brother-in-law? >>> > That's completely backwards. >>> > >>> > Specifically, brother-in-law (me'ispe) is defined as "x1 is the spouse >>> of >>> > the sister of x2 under law/custom/etc. x3" >>> > and sister-in-law (bunspe) is defined as "x1 is the spouse of the >>> brother >>> > of x2 under law/custom/etc. x3" >>> > >>> > What if the spouse of the sister is a woman? Or the spouse of the >>> brother a >>> > man? What about the sister or brother of the spouse? >>> >>> If the spouse of the sister is a woman, she is sister-in-law and me'ispe. >>> Conversely if the spouse of the brother is a man. The sibling of the >>> spouse cu >>> spebruna ja spemensi. Whoever wrote the def wasn't thinking that two >>> women >>> could be married to each other. >>> >> >> The problem is that it is the gender of the married person that is taken >> into account, not the gender of the person being spoken of. Whether I am a >> brother-in-law or a sister-in-law has nothing to do with the gender of my >> married sibling. >> >> Also, why does it matter which of the two is the married one? If Man1 >> marries Woman1 who has a brother Man2, Man2 is Man1's brother-in-law, and >> Man1 is Man2's brother-in-law. If Man1 also has a biological or adopted >> brother Man3, then Man2 and Man3 are also each other's brothers-in-law, >> even if neither of them are married. >> >> If any sibling from family A marries any sibling from family B, then >> every sibling in family A is a sibling-in-law to every sibling in family B, >> except for the two who are married, as they are spouses, not >> siblings-in-law. >> >> > By the current definitions, a woman who is married to a woman with a >>> sister >>> > is a brother-in-law, and a woman married to someone with a sister has >>> no >>> > lujvo. It also doesn't work for the relationship between a sibling of >>> one >>> > spouse and a sibling of the other spouse. >>> >>> A brother of one spouse cu me'irspebu'a a brother of the other spouse. >>> >>> Pierre >>> -- >>> lo ponse be lo mruli po'o cu ga'ezga roda lo ka dinko >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "lojban" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@** >>> googlegroups.com . >>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>> group/lojban?hl=en . >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >> >> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/sFm8JFgWIrYJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --bcaec554d6dc65fa8304ba848286 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:01 PM, vruxir <kextrii@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
...I would assume, by my understanding of tanru where the first elemen= t modifies the second, that the most basic definitions of me'ispe and b= unspe are:

lujvo are not tanru. lujvo are define= d words, said definition determined by the creator, and do not necessarily = have anything to do with the meaning of any tanru.
=A0
= lo me'ispe: sister kind-of spouse -> sister's spouse (gender not= specified, so not necessarily brother- or sister-in-law)
(shorthand for lo speni be lo mensi)

a &quo= t;sister kind-of spouse" is a spouse who is a sister, not a sister of = a spouse.

By my definition, {zo me'ispe smuni lu ko'a mensi = ko'e lonu speni lu} =3D "x1 is the sister of x2 by the bond of mar= riage; x1 is x2's sister-in-law", where {lonu speni} is short for = {ko'a goi lo ninmu .onai lo ko'a tunba cu speni lo ko'e tunba .= onai ko'e .ije ko'a na speni ko'e}


lo bun= spe: brother kind-of spouse -> brother's spouse (gender not specifie= d,=A0so not necessarily brother- or sister-in-law)
(shorthand for lo speni be lo bruna)

=
See above.
=A0

And then:

lo speme&= #39;i: spouse kind-of sister -> spouse's sister (one kind of sister-= in-law)
(shorthand for lo mensi be lo speni)

lo spebu'a: spouse kind-of brother -> spouse's brother (one= kind of brother-in-law)
(shorthand for lo bruna be lo speni)


I do think the current me'ispe and= bunspe definitions are misleading in their use of gendered terms, using En= glish terms with complex and ambiguous meanings.

In English, an in-law is someone who is related to a = person because of the in-law's family is married to someone of the othe= r person's family. The exact relationship to the person is the same rel= ationship they have to the married member of their own family plus "in= -law", with the single exception that the married couple are not sibli= ngs-in-law to each other.

The difference between a sister by birth and a sister by marriage (and = by extension, all birth vs. in-law relationships) is the bond. For example,= A is a sister-by-birth to C, B is a sister-by-marriage:

.abu mensi = cy. lodu'u ra .e ri mintu se rirni
by. mensi cy. lodu'u lo by. se lanzu cu speni lo cy. se lanzu
=A0
If the definition= is looking for search hits, then:

Searching for "brother-in-law" should bring u= p me'ispe, bunspe, spebu'a and terspebu'a
Searching f= or "sister-in-law" should bring up me'ispe, bunspe, speme'= ;i and terspeme'i
Searching for "in-law" should bring up... lots of things.


mu'o


On Monday, March 5, 2012 3:30:58 AM UTC-= 5, aionys wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Sunday, March 04, 2012 23:48:44 Jonathan Jones wrote:
> Why is bunspe defined as sister-in-law and me'ispe is brother-in-l= aw?
> That's completely backwards.
>
> Specifically, brother-in-law (me'ispe) is defined as "x1 is t= he spouse of
> the sister of x2 under law/custom/etc. x3"
> and sister-in-law (bunspe) is defined as "x1 is the spouse of the= brother
> of x2 under law/custom/etc. x3"
>
> What if the spouse of the sister is a woman? Or the spouse of the brot= her a
> man? What about the sister or brother of the spouse?

If the spouse of the sister is a woman, she is sister-in-law and me&#= 39;ispe.
Conversely if the spouse of the brother is a man. The sibling of the spouse= cu
spebruna ja spemensi. Whoever wrote the def wasn't thinking that two wo= men
could be married to each other.

The problem is tha= t it is the gender of the married person that is taken into account, not th= e gender of the person being spoken of. Whether I am a brother-in-law or a = sister-in-law has nothing to do with the gender of my married sibling.

Also, why does it matter which of the two is the married one? If Man1 m= arries Woman1 who has a brother Man2, Man2 is Man1's brother-in-law, an= d Man1 is Man2's brother-in-law. If Man1 also has a biological or adopt= ed brother Man3, then Man2 and Man3 are also each other's brothers-in-l= aw, even if neither of them are married.

If any sibling from family A marries any sibling from family B, then ev= ery sibling in family A is a sibling-in-law to every sibling in family B, e= xcept for the two who are married, as they are spouses, not siblings-in-law= .

> By the current definitions, a woman who is married to a woman wit= h a sister
> is a brother-in-law, and a woman married to someone with a sister has = no
> lujvo. It also doesn't work for the relationship between a sibling= of one
> spouse and a sibling of the other spouse.

A brother of one spouse cu me'irspebu'a a brother of the othe= r spouse.

Pierre
--
lo ponse be lo mruli po'o cu ga'ezga roda lo ka dinko

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@goo= glegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/grou= p/lojban?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi'= e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. m= i patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )<= br>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/sFm8JFgWIrYJ.

=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--bcaec554d6dc65fa8304ba848286--