Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:50548) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S4gPl-0008QY-Ht; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:30:01 -0800 Received: by vcbgb30 with SMTP id gb30sf3093743vcb.16 for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:29:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lojban+bncCP--_J2JAxDb_NT6BBoEqT19wg@googlegroups.com designates 10.52.22.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.22.3; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lojban+bncCP--_J2JAxDb_NT6BBoEqT19wg@googlegroups.com designates 10.52.22.3 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lojban+bncCP--_J2JAxDb_NT6BBoEqT19wg@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=lojban+bncCP--_J2JAxDb_NT6BBoEqT19wg@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.22.3]) by 10.52.22.3 with SMTP id z3mr12749148vde.2.1330986591113 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:29:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=AsyTqXGG40j+TgB+Jq8KAkrsOFtcYzIgCAE1sHjRWJY=; b=F1uS3qbmrfM1H0d0k8q3Ctrc8utgt+OZni0tF7lMHsJQaaJ1XzlVQ8WRDoTo6las4E bhgbnkgghXfcYqLlnTwnYWECHF7gQSfQJAVmCIRfutg0yhsH5uVEq7C1b8k4g27vC8hm PelsYEnDfv4Pr5cXsdqodMv54hTnCc8u/w3gM= Received: by 10.52.22.3 with SMTP id z3mr3734254vde.2.1330986587299; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:29:47 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.65.194 with SMTP id z2ls6315880vds.5.gmail; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:29:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.24.244 with SMTP id x20mr3714388vdf.11.1330986586596; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:29:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:29:45 -0800 (PST) From: vruxir To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <21491901.4050.1330986585960.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfy7> In-Reply-To: <22733730.2112.1330980960085.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynlt17> References: <201203050232.47562.phma@phma.optus.nu> <7853015.1110.1330974066635.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbze11> <22733730.2112.1330980960085.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynlt17> Subject: Re: [lojban] What's the deal with me'ispe and bunspe? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: kextrii@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kextrii@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kextrii@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4049_15597591.1330986585959" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_4049_15597591.1330986585959 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Monday, March 5, 2012 3:56:00 PM UTC-5, vruxir wrote: > > On Monday, March 5, 2012 3:09:52 PM UTC-5, aionys wrote: a "sister kind-of spouse" is a spouse who is a sister, not a sister of a >> spouse. >> > > I concede that, as a basic definition of "sister kind-of > spouse", incestuous marriage is just as conceivable as > spouse-associated-with-a-sister. Which meaning would be more frequently > referred to in typical conversation, I wonder. > > To be fair, "incestuous" implies cultural taboo and possible unlawfulness. Depending on the te speni... lo tabno poi simxu lo nu speni cu ju'ocu'i na'e flapro ja'i lo te speni -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/97SpobDP2RUJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_4049_15597591.1330986585959 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, March 5, 2012 3:56:00 PM UTC-5, vruxir wrote:
On Monday, March 5, 2012 3:09:52 PM UTC-5, aion= ys wrote:
a "sister k= ind-of spouse" is a spouse who is a sister, not a sister of a spouse.

I concede that, as a basic = definition of "sister kind-of spouse", incestuous marriage is just as = conceivable as spouse-associated-with-a-sister. Which meaning wou= ld be more frequently referred to in typical conversation, I wonder.
<= div> 

To be fair, "incestuous" i= mplies cultural taboo and possible unlawfulness. Depending on the te speni.= .. lo tabno poi simxu lo nu speni cu ju'ocu'i na'e flapro ja'i lo te speni<= /div>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/97= SpobDP2RUJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_4049_15597591.1330986585959--