Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:35039) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S5MRU-0007S5-C3; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:22:33 -0800 Received: by yhkk25 with SMTP id k25sf7052816yhk.16 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:22:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=vh0M3dqYJFWpgre2N4mbY2ZgAnHd+J/BbWZc4/Dcq80=; b=me2SoXY5MMfhqpNN1VjOyUQE3o88U8sAqG2FSi3MxUJmpzymdo1WykcLZCUfgnjdiX xB2CwwRfa6xkhuY25yLELBo6LnZtd4DZ7GEfuN2qQEGMPdpXLSFsB/3IOoqE00KkSypD cN9h2ZDg2A03nqjR7bWAyJVwL1AhmCLfVCb6I= Received: by 10.224.219.140 with SMTP id hu12mr674368qab.16.1331148141966; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:22:21 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.53.77 with SMTP id l13ls165360qcg.6.gmail; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:22:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.185.11 with SMTP id cm11mr1595674qab.3.1331148140514; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 11:22:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.180.136 with SMTP id bu8msqab; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:50:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.176.6 with SMTP id a6mr383209yhm.12.1331146241189; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 10:50:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:50:40 -0800 (PST) From: RexScientiarum To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <13652222.419.1331146240191.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynes7> Subject: [lojban] Biological taxonomy and other 'esoteric' vocabularies like chemical nomenclature MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: amt2839@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_418_16401696.1331146240190" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_418_16401696.1331146240190 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I noticed under the words list that there are some very preliminary attempts to 'lojbanize' (or 'lojbanise' depending on where you are from) nomenclature systems like taxonomic names and chemical compounds (as in IUPAC). How exactly does one approach discussing such topics in Lojban and at this point is there any consensus? Are there proposed 'special systems' like there is for mathematics (I imagine there will have to be). I assume these things will eventually have to be 'lojbanized' as the language grows (and theoretically/hopefully is used by more people in more situations) and although nomenclature systems like IUPAC are global standards names still very by language and orthography (honestly I don't really know exactly how chemical nomenclature works in non-English speaking countries; my understanding is that most countries now default to 'English' nomenclature now, there is still a Spanish, Japanese, Chinese IUPAC equivalent). 'Technically' speaking, taxonomic nomenclature isn't even singularly regulated under one convention (I would use ITIS as a reference point if an attempt was ever made to lojbanize taxonomy). Anyway, IF there was a consensus that there is a need to discuss such things natively in lojban (rather than defaulting to English IUPAC or some form of Roman alphabet based linnaean taxonomy) something would have to change because non lojban characters, pronounciation, pairs etc. exist in these systems, so unless lojban speakers would use some sort of tag to say: "default to English IUPAC" or similar (which seems rather malglico to me), the system would have to change. Idk, I am a junior undergraduate biology major so I don't even pretend to have some sort of truly esoteric understanding of such things, so I hope someone with more knowledge of both lojban and the natural sciences exists somewhere in the community that could answer this or at least discuss/share ideas about this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/N2TWHx5KtwsJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_418_16401696.1331146240190 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I noticed under the words list that there are some very preliminary attempt= s to 'lojbanize' (or 'lojbanise' depending on where you are from) nomenclat= ure systems like taxonomic names and chemical compounds (as in IUPAC). &nbs= p;How exactly does one approach discussing such topics in Lojban and at thi= s point is there any consensus?  Are there proposed 'special systems' = like there is for mathematics (I imagine there will have to be).

I assume these things will eventually have to be 'lojbanized' as t= he language grows (and theoretically/hopefully is used by more people in mo= re situations) and although nomenclature systems like IUPAC are global stan= dards names still very by language and orthography (honestly I don't really= know exactly how chemical nomenclature works in non-English speaking = countries; my understanding is that most countries now default to 'English'= nomenclature now, there is still a Spanish, Japanese, Chinese IUPAC equiva= lent).  'Technically' speaking, taxonomic nomenclature isn't even sing= ularly regulated under one convention (I would use ITIS as a reference poin= t if an attempt was ever made to lojbanize taxonomy).  

Anyway, IF there was a consensus that there = is a need to discuss such things natively in lojban (rather than defaulting= to English IUPAC or some form of Roman alphabet based linnaean taxonomy) s= omething would have to change because non lojban characters, pronounciation= , pairs etc. exist in these systems, so unless lojban speakers would use so= me sort of tag to say: "default to English IUPAC" or similar (which seems r= ather malglico to me), the system would have to change.

Idk, I am a junior undergraduate biology major so I don't even preten= d to have some sort of truly esoteric understanding of such thing= s, so I hope someone with more knowledge of both lojban and the natural sci= ences exists somewhere in the community that could answer this or at least = discuss/share ideas about this.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/N2= TWHx5KtwsJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_418_16401696.1331146240190--