Received: from mail-vx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:63524) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S67jX-000643-8F; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:52:24 -0800 Received: by vcbfo11 with SMTP id fo11sf2039770vcb.16 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:52:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=PJFgbaqrEV1semESLyVWaax7gLa28wciAlABs+FcIDQ=; b=GUcGcv/CWbw13GddMsY6ovowUmNWJIWZALh+o4fKGD9i4jrVCzJ9/gwKL9vqg5pU27 oJ1WOfY2P3U/eTdrIrwkGKuxV/OaqVyCYmMcZcX9w22FK704cdHzD/H58LX1TCP1cFAb DUMensJlu9vMOpMSz5mFSV4jujb3lDWMLl600= Received: by 10.52.94.78 with SMTP id da14mr645275vdb.0.1331329928756; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:52:08 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.30.131 with SMTP id u3ls5377568vcc.3.gmail; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:52:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.88.102 with SMTP id bf6mr6158919vdb.2.1331329927284; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:52:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.88.102 with SMTP id bf6mr6158918vdb.2.1331329927270; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:52:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vx0-f171.google.com (mail-vx0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hc9si3487534vdb.2.2012.03.09.13.52.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:52:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.171; Received: by mail-vx0-f171.google.com with SMTP id fl15so2239927vcb.30 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:52:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.179.35 with SMTP id dd3mr6014090vdc.2.1331329927110; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:52:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.30.97 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:51:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201203091943.33403.jezuch@interia.pl> References: <201203091943.33403.jezuch@interia.pl> From: Jacob Errington Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:51:47 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Homonyms in Stage 3 fu'ivla To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5171ead625ee704bad667a9 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec5171ead625ee704bad667a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Isn't finding something equivalent to learning its location, in which case the two definitions *are* the same, where facki2 for the second defintion is {lo ka makau se zvati ce'u} ? Also, {facki} by itself seems extremely redundant to djuno, minus a tense implication ({facki} seems to me like {co'a djuno}). It also seems like {cilre} is a {co'a djuno} + built-in modal places. Same for {ctuca} (considering that the teaching succeeds, of course.) compare: mi facki lo du'u do jbocre [kei do] mi facki lo du'u lo mi cukta cu zvati makau [kei lo mi cukta] mi co'a djuno lo du'u do jbocre [kei do] mi co'a djuno lo du'u lo mi cukta cu zvati makau [kei lo mi cukta] mi cilre lo du'u do jbocre [kei do la irk lo nu mi'o casnu bau lo lojbo] do ctuca mi lo du'u do jbocre [kei do lo nu mio casnu bau lo lojbo] Now, it seems like the difference between {cilre} and {ctuca} is volition on the part of ctuca1/cilre4. Here's my lojban definition of what {ctuca} means: lo ka ce'u goi ko'a ctuca ce'u goi ko'e ce'u goi ko'i ce'u goi ko'o ce'u goi ko'u cu ka ce'u goi ko'a zukte ce'u goi ko'u lo nu ce'u goi ko'e cilre ce'u goi ko'i ce'u goi ko'o ko'u IMHO determining the location of an object is more akin to losing that object than "beginning to know something". Thus {cirko} and {to'e cirko}/{tolcri} are more appropriate. mi cirko tu'a lo mi cukta mi tolcri tu'a lo mi cukta (I'm working under the anal-retentive assumption that cirko is "lose property" and tolcri is "acquire property" (hence the sumti-raising), in which case in a bare-bones lojban, {tolcri} is equivalent to {binxo}) mu'o mi'e la tsani 2012/3/9 Krzysztof Sobolewski > Dnia pi=C4=85tek, 9 marca 2012 o 19:11:45 MorphemeAddict napisa=C5=82(a): > > What about this definition of "facki" is more than one meaning? > > > > x1 discovers/finds out x2 (du'u) about subject/object x3; x1 finds (fi) > x3 (object) > > > > It looks to me like several English phrases used to clarify the one > meaning. > > Aren't: > > x1 discovers/finds out x2 (du'u) about subject/object x3 > x1 finds (fi) x3 (object) > > two different definitions of two different concepts? To me it borders on > malglico ;) > -- > Ecce Jezuch > "We believe - so we're misled > We assume - so we're played > We confide - so we're deceived > We trust - so we're betrayed." - T. Haake > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --bcaec5171ead625ee704bad667a9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Isn't finding something equivalent to learning its location, in which c= ase the two definitions *are* the same, where facki2 for the second definti= on is {lo ka makau se zvati ce'u} ? Also, {facki} by itself seems extre= mely redundant to djuno, minus a tense implication ({facki} seems to me lik= e {co'a djuno}). It also seems like {cilre} is a {co'a djuno} + bui= lt-in modal places. Same for {ctuca} (considering that the teaching succeed= s, of course.)

compare:
mi facki lo du'u do jbocre [kei do]
mi facki lo du'u lo mi cukta cu zvati makau [kei lo mi cukta]
mi co'a djuno lo du'u do jbocre [kei do]
mi co= 9;a djuno lo du'u lo mi cukta cu zvati makau [kei lo mi cukta]
mi cilre lo du'u do jbocre [kei do la irk lo nu mi'o casnu bau= lo lojbo]
do ctuca mi lo du'u do jbocre [kei do lo nu mio ca= snu bau lo lojbo]

Now, it seems like the differenc= e between {cilre} and {ctuca} is volition on the part of ctuca1/cilre4.
Here's my lojban definition of what {ctuca} means:
lo ka= ce'u goi ko'a ctuca ce'u goi ko'e ce'u goi ko'i ce= 'u goi ko'o ce'u goi ko'u cu ka ce'u goi ko'a zukte= ce'u goi ko'u lo nu ce'u goi ko'e cilre ce'u goi ko= 9;i ce'u goi ko'o ko'u

IMHO determining the location of an object is more akin= to losing that object than "beginning to know something". Thus {= cirko} and {to'e cirko}/{tolcri} are more appropriate.

mi cirko tu'a lo mi cukta
mi tolcri tu'a lo mi= cukta

(I'm working under the anal-retentive a= ssumption that cirko is "lose property" and tolcri is "acqui= re property" (hence the sumti-raising), in which case in a bare-bones = lojban, {tolcri} is equivalent to {binxo})

mu'o mi'e la tsani

2012/3/9 Krzysztof Sobolewski <jezuch@interia.pl>
Dnia pi=C4=85tek, 9 marca 2012 o 19:11:45 MorphemeAddict napisa=C5=82(a):
> =C2=A0What about this definition of "facki"= ; is more than one meaning?
>
> x1 discovers/finds out x2 (du'u) about subject/object x3; x1 finds= (fi) x3 (object)
>
> It looks to me like several English phrases used to clarify the one me= aning.

Aren't:

x1 discovers/finds out x2 (du'u) about subject/object x3
x1 finds (fi) x3 (object)

two different definitions of two different concepts? To me it borders= on malglico ;)
--
Ecce Jezuch
"We believe - so we're misled
We assume - so we're played
We confide - so we're deceived
We trust - so we're betrayed." - T. Haake

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--bcaec5171ead625ee704bad667a9--