Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:51266) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S6Kbp-0002Q1-Cj; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:37:18 -0800 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1sf2831040wer.16 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:37:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lr2A7RcGZZhw0lLqg7t9raeQwlRkUtjqhHaLmgT67DM=; b=vuFIXlS2MdOaVppBNAkhgjURUeWGYMHmjiwOknG15q1la47kUCihDUyzNpLqpFhKyq hNsHfTcX/EgcUDcWniVydY/JrB8KUC5EtyCv7mgjmh/+i684oH55pkdIGpRVarKX/yTP Ue2umwAfk2/YdohQdqcKbCgeR6/3NYeC8uKlE= Received: by 10.180.14.69 with SMTP id n5mr1343712wic.3.1331379419755; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:36:59 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.221.80 with SMTP id q58ls7520486wep.0.gmail; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:36:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.72.229 with SMTP id g5mr901497wiv.3.1331379418408; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:36:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.72.229 with SMTP id g5mr901496wiv.3.1331379418399; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:36:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p3si2725133wip.3.2012.03.10.03.36.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:36:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cntrational@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.182; Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l4so2320802wer.13 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:36:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.134.2 with SMTP id r2mr3483067wei.31.1331379418239; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:36:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.103.101 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:36:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3325018.1470.1331374874547.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbctz2> From: Sid Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:06:18 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Nasal assimilation To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: cntrational@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cntrational@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=cntrational@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / I'd personally say "imput" in rapid speech, and "gumtree" and "camcorder" are more lenient about phonotactics because they're compound words. But, yeah, English isn't too strict about it in slower speech, though I'd argue that assimilation happens a lot in rapid speech. Ask most English speakers to say "He got ten points." rapidly, they'll probably say "tem points". 2012/3/10 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas : > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 7:21 AM, cntrational wrot= e: >> In most languages, when nasals come before stops, they generally assimil= ate >> to the stop. So, we don't say "inpossble", we say "impossble" -- /np/ is= a >> cluster that's rare in most languages; it's usually changed to /mp/. >> Similarly for /mt/ =E2=86=92 /nt/ and /mk/ =E2=86=92 /=C5=8Bk/. Which ma= kes it really weird that >> Lojban *does* allow clusters like /np/. What's up with that? Seems like = a >> pretty glaring omission in the Lojban phonotactic rules, especially >> considering how common nasal assimilation is in the world. > > In English such assimilations don't really happen (cf. "input", > "gumtree", "camcorder"). "Impossible" came into English with the > assimilation already there. The designers of Lojban were English > speakers, not linguists, so Lojban has a strong bias towards English > phonotactics, not towards what's common in the world. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojb= an?hl=3Den. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.