Received: from mail-iy0-f189.google.com ([209.85.210.189]:47475) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S6KlC-0002UN-PK; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:46:56 -0800 Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25sf3157799iah.16 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:46:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+yy923tmjsnLhQSizw/WismVKuY+49BjEwCY7ctByxk=; b=0j30K2Z/L1knCF4lkj7pCAKPXVEaqPzHgl+lUDjm9QdNdmf6vpNaDxy6Z6V09XTRq9 WrUnpczpk5T5IOEvQYdxVtx+Ac/t7a8mz/zZhqVD/BI+gkQ1/0V5RgIleB09BVgoy8Ep tz49aQGAN6u/CwlU4XSom47SLr3qDBz+Vm16U= Received: by 10.236.156.73 with SMTP id l49mr710683yhk.15.1331380004713; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:46:44 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.203.37 with SMTP id f37ls4576036anq.9.gmail; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:46:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.77.41 with SMTP id c29mr714334yhe.13.1331380003295; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:46:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:46:42 -0800 (PST) From: gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <27828065.2262.1331380002594.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjd19> In-Reply-To: References: <3325018.1470.1331374874547.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbctz2> Subject: Re: [lojban] Nasal assimilation MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2261_3189995.1331380002592" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_2261_3189995.1331380002592 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If we replace np /nb with mp / mb will there be any clashes in existing=20 gismu (of course taking into account that two gismu can't differ in the=20 last vowel etc.) ? On Saturday, March 10, 2012 3:36:18 PM UTC+4, cntrational wrote: > > I'd personally say "imput" in rapid speech, and "gumtree" and > "camcorder" are more lenient about phonotactics because they're > compound words. But, yeah, English isn't too strict about it in slower > speech, though I'd argue that assimilation happens a lot in rapid > speech. Ask most English speakers to say "He got ten points." rapidly, > they'll probably say "tem points". > > 2012/3/10 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas : > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 7:21 AM, cntrational =20 > wrote: > >> In most languages, when nasals come before stops, they generally=20 > assimilate > >> to the stop. So, we don't say "inpossble", we say "impossble" -- /np/= =20 > is a > >> cluster that's rare in most languages; it's usually changed to /mp/. > >> Similarly for /mt/ =E2=86=92 /nt/ and /mk/ =E2=86=92 /=C5=8Bk/. Which = makes it really weird=20 > that > >> Lojban *does* allow clusters like /np/. What's up with that? Seems lik= e=20 > a > >> pretty glaring omission in the Lojban phonotactic rules, especially > >> considering how common nasal assimilation is in the world. > > > > In English such assimilations don't really happen (cf. "input", > > "gumtree", "camcorder"). "Impossible" came into English with the > > assimilation already there. The designers of Lojban were English > > speakers, not linguists, so Lojban has a strong bias towards English > > phonotactics, not towards what's common in the world. > > > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google=20 > Groups "lojban" group. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to=20 > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at=20 > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban/-/fmaLB9VGBzYJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. ------=_Part_2261_3189995.1331380002592 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If we replace np /nb with mp / mb will there be any clashes in existing gis= mu (of course taking into account that two gismu can't differ in the last v= owel etc.) ?

On Saturday, March 10, 2012 3:36:18 PM UTC+4, cntration= al wrote:
I'd personally say "i= mput" in rapid speech, and "gumtree" and
"camcorder" are more lenient ab= out phonotactics because they're
compound words. But, yeah, English isn'= t too strict about it in slower
speech, though I'd argue that assimilati= on happens a lot in rapid
speech. Ask most English speakers to say "He g= ot ten points." rapidly,
they'll probably say "tem points".

2012/3/10 = Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas <jjllambias@gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 7:21 A= M, cntrational <cntrational@gmail.com> wrote:
>> In most languages, when= nasals come before stops, they generally assimilate
>> to the sto= p. So, we don't say "inpossble", we say "impossble" -- /np/ is a
>>= ; cluster that's rare in most languages; it's usually changed to /mp/.
&= gt;> Similarly for /mt/ =E2=86=92 /nt/ and /mk/ =E2=86=92 /=C5=8Bk/. Whi= ch makes it really weird that
>> Lojban *does* allow clusters like= /np/. What's up with that? Seems like a
>> pretty glaring omissio= n in the Lojban phonotactic rules, especially
>> considering how c= ommon nasal assimilation is in the world.
>
> In English such a= ssimilations don't really happen (cf. "input",
> "gumtree", "camcorde= r"). "Impossible" came into English with the
> assimilation already t= here. The designers of Lojban were English
> speakers, not linguists,= so Lojban has a strong bias towards English
> phonotactics, not towa= rds what's common in the world.
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to th= e Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email t= o lojban@googl= egroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojb= an+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit t= his group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.
&g= t;

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/fm= aLB9VGBzYJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_2261_3189995.1331380002592--