Received: from mail-gx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:37040) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SARIO-0006Y5-Mn; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:34:09 -0700 Received: by ggmi2 with SMTP id i2sf1872623ggm.16 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:34:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=npFs4ooh+QoI86BHHiVPIHF1Xtrfo2ciyEf5OpTMhjk=; b=w94GI3wiGWTyF6GB0Bau6KoHUWwoAQywevrgL0LJUfeHMbvyD1S/YGCvGp1yTnrnyX GMbMqTmv1ASQVycrN9ZD54ySCWFXcOLq9cXxHwSotUiAkcHRnmSNRgoDKJ0FgumAZ+qL EvK+bpME3dJ6QO7Pp2d/tmmnShk2YW72zOugI= Received: by 10.50.216.133 with SMTP id oq5mr1452658igc.4.1332358436756; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:33:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.28.130 with SMTP id m2ls2062680ibc.5.gmail; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.130.73 with SMTP id oc9mr1311287pbb.20.1332358435800; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:33:55 -0700 (PDT) From: RexScientiarum To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <20686063.665.1332358435120.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yncd14> Subject: [lojban] Question about a fuilva MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: amt2839@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amt2839@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=amt2839@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_664_30923993.1332358435119" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_664_30923993.1332358435119 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Alright look, I don't want hear a big debate on weather stage 4 fu'ivla are good or anything because I am not asking that. I am just a bit confused over morphophpology, specifically as in what are legal consonant clusters etc.. I was looking on the exauhstive type 4 fu'ilva forms and I want to know what the slash in CVCC/CVV it doesn't mean rafsi does it? Does it mean a buffer consonant goes before or after the slash? I want to know if fungnau is morphologically acceptable. How do I get the program that identifies legal words to work on windows 7 64 bit (sorry can't think of the name of program), it would certainly help but when I tried to get it to work it said it isn't compatible with this version of DOS (which I expected actually) is there a workaround for this? Will it work with DOSBox? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/R65FO7-49CcJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_664_30923993.1332358435119 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alright look, I don't want hear a big debate on weather stage 4 fu'ivla are= good or anything because I am not asking that. I am just a bit confused o= ver morphophpology, specifically as in what are legal consonant clusters et= c.. I was looking on the exauhstive type 4 fu'ilva forms and I want to know= what the slash in CVCC/CVV it doesn't mean rafsi does it? Does it mean a = buffer consonant goes before or after the slash?  I want to know if fu= ngnau is morphologically acceptable.

How do I = get the program that identifies legal words to work on windows 7 64 bit (so= rry can't think of the name of program), it would certainly help but when I= tried to get it to work it said it isn't compatible with this version of D= OS (which I expected actually) is there a workaround for this?  Will i= t work with DOSBox?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/R6= 5FO7-49CcJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_664_30923993.1332358435119--