Received: from mail-wi0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]:38007)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCL3SuIvlExCpwPH7BBoEVwUjtw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1SFRhq-000584-4c; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:01:14 -0700
Received: by wibhq12 with SMTP id hq12sf315156wib.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id
         :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=CSFMc0bOEVTsYMag0/vTqhXciOM2zYupAO0bT3Fy9Jw=;
        b=68olUT1ZLIDDyTivi+8vRWc6Y2vzunuLqFvrtsO6w7tsrQarOd0VZfIq3tFHgA8Dx3
         y0XXvssLh6rekywb4PdXYm/iPDeBrJxXATj8R/ecKpN64+Nl5jpMPii/juo/gmorJpzq
         d1Q6E5YfcYuThSPNe65wkrfcCCmX8Dyjfft/o=
Received: by 10.216.205.213 with SMTP id j63mr656831weo.0.1333551145554;
        Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.216.199.225 with SMTP id x75ls523743wen.9.gmail; Wed, 04 Apr
 2012 07:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.79.231 with SMTP id m7mr540503wix.0.1333551143819;
        Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.79.231 with SMTP id m7mr540493wix.0.1333551143335;
        Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.22])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id fm5si485834wib.2.2012.04.04.07.52.23;
        Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.22;
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Apr 2012 14:52:22 -0000
Received: from p57A082E5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.33]) [87.160.130.229]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 04 Apr 2012 16:52:22 +0200
X-Authenticated: #54293076
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18eC08KvQoeIyn5XQiJl4IZTp5gLy/mXVfSySCHm0
	adbuwTByuziV94
Message-ID: <4F7C6026.4040705@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:52:22 +0200
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] LA SUMTI BRIVLA
References: <CAKOEKkSrQu48A2XVO=j27rjC_7uk2_q5t4EOXh8jfKoOVjrGkg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKOEKkSrQu48A2XVO=j27rjC_7uk2_q5t4EOXh8jfKoOVjrGkg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

*{la mi .crib.} does not work. However, it's perfectly fine to say {la 
pe mi .crib.} which *is* grammatical, just as {la noi banli [ku'o] 
.crib.} is also grammatical.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

Am 04.04.2012 15:11, schrieb Michael Turniansky:
>   Just checking with people who understand the grammar to make sure 
> that the following is correct:
>
> You are allowed to interpose a sumti between the la and name for those 
> cases where the name is a brivla, such as "la mi cribe cu gerku" -> 
> "la cribe pe mi cu gerku" (My Bear is a dog), or "la ba'u lo ponse be 
>  lo gerku kuku pinxe be lo djacu cu taske za'ure'u ku .oi" (The dog 
> owner's  "Water-Drinker" is thirsty again *sigh* )  but not where the 
> name is a cmevla, *la mi crib. cu gerku (*My Shreeb is a dog)
>
>   Would I have that right?  (The permissibility surprised me.  I can 
> readily see how the the latter can't be allowed, because it would 
> agglutinate into "la micrib. cu gerku", and how the first can't be 
> ambiguous, but I was surprised to see it was allowed anyhow, simply 
> because of symmetry reasons)
>
>                       --gejyspa
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

-- 
.i da xamgu ganse fi no na'ebo lo risna
.i lo vajrai cu nonselji'u lo kanla

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.