Received: from mail-bk0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:60854) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SFTqY-00065f-7N; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:18:21 -0700 Received: by bkcjg9 with SMTP id jg9sf314058bkc.16 for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:18:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=+sYbKZIgDzUPTlimetFxcrR3kL2NnZ/x7UQnEqvAoY4=; b=wQ7RQkoyrQZ0mJin3OO4rUse/CiSf6J59UoWJfAoVvZI9MSaKyPjlh2PT93hrm4b+I mo0tIJBjGnhC7g4fbO5YRLeOuEjJFPB5tb2FdmQ27S18ofFh6wqI8tiJNzu05RK0ZVqd oYlv5QmBCSZGtuctN+HDV7SUA/InS7KC7Bib8= Received: by 10.204.157.150 with SMTP id b22mr1203191bkx.7.1333559874581; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:17:54 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.205.128.6 with SMTP id hc6ls694426bkc.3.gmail; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.123.6 with SMTP id gi6mr1526634bkc.5.1333559873213; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.123.6 with SMTP id gi6mr1526633bkc.5.1333559873185; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bk0-f52.google.com (mail-bk0-f52.google.com [209.85.214.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8si1392385bka.1.2012.04.04.10.17.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.52; Received: by bkcjm19 with SMTP id jm19so815793bkc.39 for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:17:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.136.198 with SMTP id s6mr7400432bkt.129.1333559872955; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.63.200 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:17:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F7C6026.4040705@gmx.de> References: <4F7C6026.4040705@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:17:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] LA SUMTI BRIVLA From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cac7883a5df04bcdd9aef X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --0015175cac7883a5df04bcdd9aef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hmmm... so it is, which then makes the IMpermissibility of "la mi crib li'o" more inexplicable.... On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM, selpa'i wrote: > *{la mi .crib.} does not work. However, it's perfectly fine to say {la pe > mi .crib.} which *is* grammatical, just as {la noi banli [ku'o] .crib.} is > also grammatical. > > mu'o mi'e la selpa'i > > Am 04.04.2012 15:11, schrieb Michael Turniansky: > >> Just checking with people who understand the grammar to make sure that >> the following is correct: >> >> You are allowed to interpose a sumti between the la and name for those >> cases where the name is a brivla, such as "la mi cribe cu gerku" -> "la >> cribe pe mi cu gerku" (My Bear is a dog), or "la ba'u lo ponse be lo gerku >> kuku pinxe be lo djacu cu taske za'ure'u ku .oi" (The dog owner's >> "Water-Drinker" is thirsty again *sigh* ) but not where the name is a >> cmevla, *la mi crib. cu gerku (*My Shreeb is a dog) >> >> Would I have that right? (The permissibility surprised me. I can >> readily see how the the latter can't be allowed, because it would >> agglutinate into "la micrib. cu gerku", and how the first can't be >> ambiguous, but I was surprised to see it was allowed anyhow, simply because >> of symmetry reasons) >> >> --gejyspa >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@** >> googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >> group/lojban?hl=en . >> > > -- > .i da xamgu ganse fi no na'ebo lo risna > .i lo vajrai cu nonselji'u lo kanla > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@** > googlegroups.com . > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** > group/lojban?hl=en . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0015175cac7883a5df04bcdd9aef Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=A0 Hmmm... so it is, which then makes the IMpermissibilit= y of "la mi crib li'o" more inexplicable....

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> w= rote:
*{la mi .crib.} does not work. However, it&#= 39;s perfectly fine to say {la pe mi .crib.} which *is* grammatical, just a= s {la noi banli [ku'o] .crib.} is also grammatical.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

Am 04.04.2012 15:11, schrieb Michael Turniansky:
=A0Just checking with people who understand the grammar to make sure that = the following is correct:

You are allowed to interpose a sumti between the la and name for those case= s where the name is a brivla, such as "la mi cribe cu gerku" ->= ; "la cribe pe mi cu gerku" (My Bear is a dog), or "la ba= 9;u lo ponse be =A0lo gerku kuku pinxe be lo djacu cu taske za'ure'= u ku .oi" (The dog owner's =A0"Water-Drinker" is thirsty= again *sigh* ) =A0but not where the name is a cmevla, *la mi crib. cu gerk= u (*My Shreeb is a dog)

=A0Would I have that right? =A0(The permissibility surprised me. =A0I can = readily see how the the latter can't be allowed, because it would agglu= tinate into "la micrib. cu gerku", and how the first can't be= ambiguous, but I was surprised to see it was allowed anyhow, simply becaus= e of symmetry reasons)

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0--gejyspa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@goo= glegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/grou= p/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
.i da xamgu ganse fi no na'ebo lo risna
.i lo vajrai cu nonselji'u lo kanla

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@goo= glegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/grou= p/lojban?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0015175cac7883a5df04bcdd9aef--