Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:51130) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SS6tl-00021f-Tg; Wed, 09 May 2012 06:25:50 -0700 Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23sf359977vbz.16 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 06:25:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=6rclzkOn63gpJTO9TSHoZYSIo6+mPMKLxoQi4bHb/24=; b=4Q3YzQFufm2KzbNjeJQJFFDP4lbbyJEQilBW+OSIpapiuxl4knReJOrsTwsfr7SZm7 QqoRDQw4oQEDaOD4LsVcwdg5oqijxLZ/nRT4Q6f2vMAuHlIYgApJIsFOEARDjlHKauo1 NLyPs5ACHp3kl1vuYY3c1W9e/YQ4J5mBRY6b0= Received: by 10.236.80.9 with SMTP id j9mr13923yhe.19.1336569939013; Wed, 09 May 2012 06:25:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.170.2 with SMTP id x2ls1482402ano.3.gmail; Wed, 09 May 2012 06:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.170.66 with SMTP id o42mr10609yhl.11.1336569938398; Wed, 09 May 2012 06:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 06:25:37 -0700 (PDT) From: gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <1001561.454.1336569937800.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbli11> In-Reply-To: <13765994.1942.1336566814390.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynss9> References: <13765994.1942.1336566814390.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynss9> Subject: [lojban] Re: bugs in jbovlaste MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_453_13276490.1336569937799" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_453_13276490.1336569937799 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Jbovlaste is by far the best dictionary engine I've seen in my life. Better than Wiktionary (looks more as a database, not a note-taking software), better than OmegaWiki (more fields for glosswords etc.) On Wednesday, May 9, 2012 4:33:34 PM UTC+4, ianek wrote: > > coi rodo > Quite often I hear that something in jbovlaste isn't good (usually > misleading keywords). But jbovlaste is not carved in stone! How come people > keep complaining and errors are still there? I have some hypotheses: > a) people are lazy > b) people tend to avoid responsibility for making changes, because > jbovlaste is so official > c) jbovlaste interface is very unpleasant and people avoid any contact > with it > d) ???? > > Ad a. People somehow have power for complaining, they could use it for > making world better as well? > Ad b. Maybe we should make an unofficial development clone of jbovlaste? > Ad c. Maybe we should make jbovlaste 2.0? I think it's the hardest part... > Ad d. ???? > > mu'o mi'e ianek > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/B_5Az3s9TUkJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_453_13276490.1336569937799 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jbovlaste is by far the best dictionary engine I've seen in my life. Better= than Wiktionary (looks more as a database, not a note-taking software), be= tter than OmegaWiki (more fields for glosswords etc.)

On Wednesday, = May 9, 2012 4:33:34 PM UTC+4, ianek wrote:
coi rodo
Quite often I hear that something in jbovlas= te isn't good (usually misleading keywords). But jbovlaste is not carved in= stone! How come people keep complaining and errors are still there? I have= some hypotheses:
a) people are lazy
b) people tend to avoid = responsibility for making changes, because jbovlaste is so official
c) jbovlaste interface is very unpleasant and people avoid any contact w= ith it
d) ????

Ad a. People somehow have= power for complaining, they could use it for making world better as well?<= /div>
Ad b. Maybe we should make an unofficial development clone of jbo= vlaste?
Ad c. Maybe we should make jbovlaste 2.0? I think it's th= e hardest part...
Ad d. ????

mu'o mi'e i= anek

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/B_= 5Az3s9TUkJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_453_13276490.1336569937799--