Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:59844) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SSuyU-00070d-IA; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:54:11 -0700 Received: by yhq56 with SMTP id 56sf3713001yhq.16 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:53:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RIamb8EYeHUh9k0MDatEY6CyBoQg9HmRd5aUqhyj6Wk=; b=V4fVWsWMYP93HOBJ/8PVihp1a/Ju9pTd3cnqJLtsMrHDVyDMbR93VugfOz78UFjZs/ eRWS6rN5u24R1AZJwx2973pkbYmakL+b7yaf/GviQKjF8UXjl+3+fcZOg8oHcRJWmLou JzBbHPGB/TxKSPGsKK9StgALwJNwQ6vu+UEFw= Received: by 10.52.36.136 with SMTP id q8mr412706vdj.17.1336762431789; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:53:51 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.33.167 with SMTP id s7ls2230616vdi.5.gmail; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:53:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.30.40 with SMTP id p8mr416918vdh.15.1336762430895; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by w10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 11:53:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <28872598.911.1336731707204.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbws2> References: <13765994.1942.1336566814390.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynss9> <20120509170127.GR27762@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <27554010.67.1336587846504.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yngr14> <20120509192018.GS27762@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <524651.567.1336675068460.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbak7> <28872598.911.1336731707204.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbws2> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.168 Safari/535.19,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <767ac64d-ec1d-4895-9a94-09b048e18476@w10g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: bugs in jbovlaste From: ianek To: lojban X-Original-Sender: janek37@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of janek37@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=janek37@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Sounds like PHP philosophy ;) "Yes, this part of the language is broken, but we'll never fix it because it breaks compatibility" On 11 Maj, 12:21, gleki wrote: > On Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:37:48 PM UTC+4, ianek wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 9, 2012 9:20:18 PM UTC+2, Robin Powell wrote: > > >> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:24:06AM -0700, ianek wrote: > > >> > On Wednesday, May 9, 2012 7:01:27 PM UTC+2, Robin Powell wrote: > > >> > > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:33:34AM -0700, ianek wrote: > >> > > > coi rodo Quite often I hear that something in jbovlaste isn't > >> > > > good (usually misleading keywords). But jbovlaste is not > >> > > > carved in stone! How come people keep complaining and errors > >> > > > are still there? I have some hypotheses: > > >> > > > a) people are lazy > > >> > > It's more-or-less that; jbovlaste is written in a language > >> > > framework that no-one around here really likes, the original > >> > > author is gone, and I don't have the time. =A0I've asked for help > >> > > with it several times, and been totally ignored. > > >> > I was talking about seperate things: the jbovlaste data and the > >> > jbovlaste interface. People complain about the data, especially > >> > misleading keywords/glosses. And AFAIK glosses are not baselined > >> > and can be changed at any time, unlike gismu definitions. And yet > >> > they stay the same. > > >> Gloss words for *gismu* are absolutely official, don't touch them. > >> Make notes at > >>http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+gismu+Issues, and if you > >> want me to get to them faster, help with CLLv1.1. > > > Fine, I've just added aionys' complaints about familial gismu, and also > > xorxes' proposed definition of xruti. If anynone knows about other prop= osed > > changes, please check whether they're there and if not, add them. > > What's that with {xruti}? It's agentive, don't touch it! > Let's create another experimental gismu with the definition {x1 (agent) > returns to origin/earlier state x3 from x4} or possibly with another orde= r > of sumti. > But {xruti} must retain the meaning. > *OTHERWISE WE'LL LOSE COMPATIBILITY WITH OLDER TEXTS.* > > > > > > > > > > >> For everything else, if you think it needs fixing, change it. > >> Anything can be edited by anyone with an account. > > >> > > > Ad c. Maybe we should make jbovlaste 2.0? I think it's the > >> > > > hardest part... > > >> > > I've also requested this many times. =A0I gather Dag has done some > >> > > work here, but nothing worth showing off. > > >> > To complete such a project you need at least two people: one who > >> > has the resources to do it (skill, time, will) and another, who > >> > knows what they want from this project and can demand from the > >> > former (which includes setting deadlines) and preferably has some > >> > power over them (eg. by paying them for work). It's not easy to > >> > get such two people, but it's even harder (pe'i) to get a bigger > >> > project done without them. > > >> I'm perfectly capable of being the demander, if I had any evidence > >> that there was anyone around here who could be the do-er; everyone > >> who has ever offered to help with anything around here has stopped > >> helping within, at the very longest, about a month[1]. > > > By saying "perfectly capable of being the demander" you (pe'i) don't me= an > > that you have some power over potential doers, which is pe'i the source= of > > problems. But it's really hard to gain power without lots of money, so = I'm > > afraid I can't help here. > > >> We have money, but we don't have the kind of money to pay someone to > >> complete a large-scale programming project at reasonable rates. > > >> -Robin > > >> [1]: There actually is one exception, but he had little choice as > >> his mother insisted that he work, volunteer, or leave her house; > >> IIRC he lasted for like 2 months, maybe 3, before suddenly stopping > >> work for no apparent reason; I have no idea what he told his mom. > > >> -- > >>http://singinst.org/: =A0Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > >> .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e > >> lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e > >> lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybak= ni > >> li'u --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.