Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:63265) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SSzJp-0000lx-HG; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:32:24 -0700 Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23sf3768778vbz.16 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:32:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=FGnCF4KJWl8GqqClfCBvsh63exRUwn7FIRf80hZsRoY=; b=cR5CRoiHshHKWwBFiQwCiZqaiC6nlfDDhZcd+/Vvyrn6tGwAC4F5468yjMwCV/1Su0 47AL6RBOzrEuRc/Gzb1TQgpYQwfAcF73ZykWCMKHonm2jZO8hgHt6n+IQTTo/dHYoe+N Dj8A0T+STSDdLl3Tra+ravlAcaBEI2ecNCVzI= Received: by 10.68.190.70 with SMTP id go6mr3425pbc.0.1336779130563; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:32:10 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.223.72 with SMTP id qs8ls8742072pbc.6.gmail; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.234.38 with SMTP id ub6mr45955pbc.2.1336779130013; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.234.38 with SMTP id ub6mr45954pbc.2.1336779130003; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:32:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gp10si3328334pbc.2.2012.05.11.16.32.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 May 2012 16:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SSzJg-0000lt-Oa for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:32:09 -0700 Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:32:08 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Word changing and word creation (was Re: [lojban] bugs in jbovlaste) Message-ID: <20120511233208.GC1837@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <13765994.1942.1336566814390.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynss9> <20120509170127.GR27762@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <27554010.67.1336587846504.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yngr14> <20120509192018.GS27762@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <524651.567.1336675068460.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbak7> <28872598.911.1336731707204.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbws2> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 06:54:45AM -0600, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:21 AM, gleki wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:37:48 PM UTC+4, ianek wrote: > >> > >> > >> Fine, I've just added aionys' complaints about familial gismu, and also > >> xorxes' proposed definition of xruti. If anynone knows about other proposed > >> changes, please check whether they're there and if not, add them. > >> > > > > What's that with {xruti}? It's agentive, don't touch it! > > Let's create another experimental gismu with the definition {x1 (agent) > > returns to origin/earlier state x3 from x4} or possibly with another order > > of sumti. > > But {xruti} must retain the meaning. > > *OTHERWISE WE'LL LOSE COMPATIBILITY WITH OLDER TEXTS.* > > > [snip] > > Second, you are over-reacting. Also, it is my personal opinion that, > especially in the case of xruti, breaking older text is worth not having a > broken place structure. > [snip] > > In short, we do /not/ make new gismu unless it is /absolutely/ necessary. FWIW, as the apparent overlord these days, I disagree, *strongly*, with both of those points. gismu should not be changed unless it can be shown that particular places have been very rarely used correctly, and I think making a bunch more gismu is a great idea. When CLLv1.1 is done, maybe I'll have time to finish my essay on the latter issue, and word creation in general. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.