Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:57591) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ST5HF-00036f-Ks; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:54:10 -0700 Received: by dadp14 with SMTP id p14sf3931273dad.16 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=TMADCyZ3qWoQWIMZVCMom3csR4Vi+9fvQKycorW54Z0=; b=I5RSnzdpmiNkGAN3JzCP1LrQ5NFzUTlHTIkeLQNiMGn30mOo4KAqfVbiIgUX9fqPfd /60z0U8DT5B+P4OsUKHj3EGaMiKDJoIM0NjAnyThmp8eiShaH3S2jmEyQPHqYSDqa146 8ZGwCKmKy/DTd10P/7BAS723v2kvFkBIiCAR8= Received: by 10.68.236.234 with SMTP id ux10mr54711pbc.9.1336802035658; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:55 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.229.8 with SMTP id sm8ls9331798pbc.0.gmail; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.200.227 with SMTP id jv3mr772109pbc.6.1336802035202; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.200.227 with SMTP id jv3mr772108pbc.6.1336802035194; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id or6si4413028pbc.0.2012.05.11.22.53.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ST5H8-00036c-7X for lojban@googlegroups.com; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:54 -0700 Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 22:53:54 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Word changing and word creation (was Re: [lojban] bugs in jbovlaste) Message-ID: <20120512055353.GG1837@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <13765994.1942.1336566814390.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynss9> <20120509170127.GR27762@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <27554010.67.1336587846504.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yngr14> <20120509192018.GS27762@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <524651.567.1336675068460.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbak7> <28872598.911.1336731707204.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbws2> <20120511233208.GC1837@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <16931991.39.1336801090529.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbgl4> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <16931991.39.1336801090529.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbgl4> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:38:10PM -0700, gleki wrote: > >>FWIW, as the apparent overlord these days, I disagree, > >>*strongly*, with both of those points. gismu should not be > >>changed unless it can be shown that particular places have been > >>very rarely used correctly, and I think making a bunch more > >>gismu is a great idea. > > And I have to add that Next Lojban must not conflict with the > existing one so that in year 2112 texts written in 2012 will still > be apprehensible. You mean "comprehensible". Generally speaing, yes, although I expect I *will* be changing some things, but only with a clear, and fairly long, deprecation process, and probably only things that have seen little or no actual use. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.