Received: from mail-gg0-f189.google.com ([209.85.161.189]:62829) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1STCKM-0006mE-I3; Sat, 12 May 2012 06:25:55 -0700 Received: by ggke5 with SMTP id e5sf2998785ggk.16 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 06:25:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=PMX/f2r27qNnmd4moZg3KdMjTqXH++RytJUT71nCSkI=; b=1vjxCSDtW6KT+93ZJYJZDtAb8nnxgCgP3ja+/8EFVyUPLZzYEYmZfVCzbzcEIhJ17/ iQwQYq7Mv7leRB/FLg4wgw5fd7YEJX8kjqbfdIvptvtI0/d9hoAubdbYpslsv13JD1f3 WcVcYkogdzP+MMnwKazQvowhZk4QsK3XOKZgA= Received: by 10.236.115.169 with SMTP id e29mr55052yhh.16.1336829135810; Sat, 12 May 2012 06:25:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.39.1 with SMTP id r1ls2236anj.3.gmail; Sat, 12 May 2012 06:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.115.169 with SMTP id e29mr55050yhh.16.1336829135228; Sat, 12 May 2012 06:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 06:25:33 -0700 (PDT) From: gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <7321907.260.1336829133552.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynz24> Subject: [lojban] Etymology of future gismu (if they are to be created) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / In recent discussion in "bugs in jbovlaste" Robin suggested that thinking of a bunch of new gismu is worth considering. If this side wins what will be the source of the sounding of those gismu? Don't you think that 6 languages are too few? Let's take English and Spanish. There are much more speakers of those two compared with Portuguese, French and Italian. But if we combine the last three with the previous two they might considerably shift the ratings of phonemes and their combinations when applying the gismu creation algorithm (http://dag.github.com/cll/4/14/) because many words sound similar in those languages. So why not expand the algorithm to more than 6 languages and may be even up to 20-30 languages as these days (as opposed to 1987) it's not a problem to find the sounding of the selected gismu concept for every language. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/86ZzLrDoeGsJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.