Received: from mail-bk0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:60061) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1STIRG-0001nP-LO; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:57:18 -0700 Received: by bkcik5 with SMTP id ik5sf2232943bkc.16 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:57:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Pud6RTNLF8ctGI9kWZoAeXeSHQuhBv/5VxKXbW1/Oo0=; b=JnEU6fe5XqVmjDQWARe9eqzoRF6CbivjhpgAr0uyWSAw98Im0oYhZFXJx9ZW9aaiEG Z3Hvrra3E/0SLcXSLRlULsyBaILinfCjMqeD7WlriRO6o5SaJpIWGuaAQrm4aH7Qwn2x ZZT/oH4Z6EVC+hfvu4eEPL7uHc7vPv4Q5EWK8= Received: by 10.205.138.10 with SMTP id iq10mr59677bkc.28.1336852626813; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:57:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.130.88 with SMTP id r24ls6523159bks.4.gmail; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.141.4 with SMTP id k4mr270189bku.6.1336852625587; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.141.4 with SMTP id k4mr270188bku.6.1336852625547; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (mail-lb0-f171.google.com [209.85.217.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ig3si15975466bkc.3.2012.05.12.12.57.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 12 May 2012 12:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.171; Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id m4so3148249lbo.2 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:57:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.112.100 with SMTP id ip4mr2744605lab.1.1336852625346; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.22.68 with HTTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 12:57:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7321907.260.1336829133552.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynz24> References: <7321907.260.1336829133552.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynz24> Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 13:57:05 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Etymology of future gismu (if they are to be created) From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d040838fdd9d0b304bfdc41f2 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d040838fdd9d0b304bfdc41f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:25 AM, gleki wrote: > In recent discussion in "bugs in jbovlaste" Robin suggested that thinking > of a bunch of new gismu is worth considering. > If this side wins > There are no sides, and no winning. There will be no creation, destruction, or alteration of gismu until the baseline is finished being documented, after that, it is possible and even likely that all will occur. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --f46d040838fdd9d0b304bfdc41f2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:25 AM, gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
In recent discussion in "bugs in jbovlaste" Robin suggested that = thinking of a bunch of new gismu is worth considering.
If this side wins <snip&g= t;

There are no sides, and no winning. Th= ere will be no creation, destruction, or alteration of gismu until the base= line is finished being documented, after that, it is possible and even like= ly that all will occur.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Lu= ke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--f46d040838fdd9d0b304bfdc41f2--