Received: from mail-wg0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:43789)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCP2YlPCQHRCDsL79BBoEdbn1nA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1STWmp-00061f-JL; Sun, 13 May 2012 04:16:31 -0700
Received: by wgbdt10 with SMTP id dt10sf2721310wgb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 13 May 2012 04:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from
         :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=Mql62+gi2n6A7qioDEi2EMlgbPKFlWUyMTEeSKq5DhI=;
        b=X+Qni5YxHLWWXWxye28fdV7dK4b52eeFBAhgrxzwYbv4flw42sx5V/JWwHH7M/2VvR
         DCAVkpj7QycLF4hgJXiHPwRw58y+v32DrE7tO+ttg40fJSUd7NwNFVt7/iLoQ7Lmz92x
         MhyrGVKP0pF/M1KwCCFC9TSfMAy18rz7j5004=
Received: by 10.180.103.131 with SMTP id fw3mr316646wib.3.1336907779886;
        Sun, 13 May 2012 04:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.87.234 with SMTP id bb10ls3468916wib.4.gmail; Sun, 13 May
 2012 04:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.90.40 with SMTP id bt8mr606339wib.2.1336907778317;
        Sun, 13 May 2012 04:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.90.40 with SMTP id bt8mr606338wib.2.1336907778309;
        Sun, 13 May 2012 04:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ef4si4204951wib.1.2012.05.13.04.16.18
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 13 May 2012 04:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cntrational@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.170;
Received: by wibhm6 with SMTP id hm6so707998wib.1
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 13 May 2012 04:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.87.35 with SMTP id u3mr10793034wiz.11.1336907778070; Sun,
 13 May 2012 04:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.103.228 with HTTP; Sun, 13 May 2012 04:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5683060.1568.1336888868482.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbq19>
References: <7321907.260.1336829133552.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynz24>
 <20120512173520.GJ1837@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <8573463.77.1336885324334.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbaf5>
 <CAMKwHj2939gsHa=r6vwSW5taW96dPJ7o4efku9ufnpydrd_e_Q@mail.gmail.com> <5683060.1568.1336888868482.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbq19>
From: Sid <cntrational@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 16:45:37 +0530
Message-ID: <CANc60thv_=A2OC=COS=NSD2-L8fu1rZwyqn1MkU2zW5hsi3hpg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Etymology of future gismu (if they are to be created)
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: cntrational@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of cntrational@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.170 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=cntrational@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

Bengali is indeed up there, but it's still a fairly close call with Russian.

mi'e cntr

On 13 May 2012 11:31, gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>I know from experience that any and all translation programs are horrid at translation.
>>>Furthermore, I don't see any need to include more languages into the algorithm.
>
> Transliteration *may be* horrid indeed (especially in case of Arabic). However, audio recordings can solve this issue.
> The algorithm was chosen to make people from all over the world learn words quicker.
> If so why limit the number of source languages to 6?
> Russian is no longer among first 6. There is probably Bengali or Indonesian instead of it.
> And do those 6 languages really represent the majority of the population of the planet?
> The most trustworthy answer is the following.
> If adding more languages changes the resulting sounding then 6 languages are not enough.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/PigADiIPnt4J.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.