Received: from mail-fa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]:54365) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SfdgM-0005S5-MQ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:03:58 -0700 Received: by faaa5 with SMTP id a5sf1787677faa.16 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:03:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Nc/qeymYvFcFO2tPTwdClmts96xJO9U8404wVJNFUqw=; b=kZnR5RnKBj680T5mDgC24e+QxGgz+eLTexm/H8eofCrNsBSKHIVTisoUhzFlbUopyN OyuZta49qzcoP6aDSfiP9wINu/dJklbPbqcLGkKbESuqYlVSErJI+Fwi8erltV1OpYaq G8gLA+0fxBs8sJvt/R8Kwiq1+DBGtpLwErbQQ= Received: by 10.204.128.198 with SMTP id l6mr512388bks.30.1339794222884; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:03:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.152.214 with SMTP id h22ls2117674bkw.4.gmail; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.152.217 with SMTP id h25mr1020392bkw.3.1339794221876; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.152.217 with SMTP id h25mr1020391bkw.3.1339794221853; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com (mail-bk0-f45.google.com [209.85.214.45]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iv15si7897426bkc.0.2012.06.15.14.03.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.45; Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id j10so3288596bkw.32 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:03:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.22 with SMTP id e22mr3469135bkw.8.1339794221647; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.125.5 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:03:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201206151650.50392.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201206151650.50392.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:03:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] definition of si'e From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d046ca7499104c2892679 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --0015175d046ca7499104c2892679 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 What you are seeing here is an artifact of English. "nth" here is used not in the ordinal sense (first, second, third, etc.), but in the sense of a fraction (think of three fifTHS, eleven twelfTHs, etc.) --gejyspa On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Friday 15 June 2012 13:53:23 guskant wrote: > > The definition of si'e is inconsistent with its usage. According to > > the Complete Lojban Language Chapter 18 (and also to jbovlaste), si'e > > is defined as: > > x1 is an (n)th portion of mass x2. > > The example shows however that si'e itself does not imply fi'u (an > (n)th): > > 11.8) levi sanmi cu fi'ucisi'e lei mi djedi cidja > > This-here meal is-a-slash-three-portion-of my day-food. > > This meal is one-third of my daily food. > > Guessing from the example, the definition of si'e must be: > > x1 is n times portion of mass x2. > > n is a positive real number or 0, or may be simply a real number. I > > can't imagine the case that n is a complex number, but it might be > > mathematically possible. > > Sounds good to me. You may want to add a note that, normally, n is 0 > ga'obi'iga'o 1. > > Pierre > > -- > ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --0015175d046ca7499104c2892679 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=A0 =A0 What you are seeing here is an artifact of English= . =A0"nth" here is used not in the=A0ordinal=A0sense (first, seco= nd, third, etc.), but in the sense of a fraction (think of three fifTHS, el= even twelfTHs, etc.)

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --gejyspa


On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:50 PM,= Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2012 13:= 53:23 guskant wrote:
> The definition of si'e is inconsistent with its usage. According t= o
> the Complete Lojban Language Chapter 18 (and also to jbovlaste), si= 9;e
> is defined as:
> =A0 =A0x1 is an (n)th portion of mass x2.
> The example shows however that si'e itself does not imply fi'u= (an (n)th):
> =A0 =A011.8) =A0 =A0levi sanmi cu fi'ucisi'e lei mi djedi cidj= a
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0This-here meal is-a-slash-three-portion-of my day-food.=
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0This meal is one-third of my daily food.
> Guessing from the example, the definition of si'e must be:
> =A0 =A0x1 is n times portion of mass x2.
> n is a positive real number or 0, or may be simply a real number. I > can't imagine the case that n is a complex number, but it might be=
> mathematically possible.

Sounds good to me. You may want to add a note that, normally, n is 0<= br> ga'obi'iga'o 1.

Pierre

--
ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--0015175d046ca7499104c2892679--