Received: from mail-lb0-f189.google.com ([209.85.217.189]:43298) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SgHqE-0003Mr-TI; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:56:47 -0700 Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5sf3404262lbo.16 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:56:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=qiQ49SxgRwW8Ar0CHnzPOWJqKtZuxNyPINiibEqGqxg=; b=a0Mq8LCx6y4hysDoSabSbd4cPR1vPJDz0/2jO6/uf09shc7+XNjJNv3ElDM0khoXrg Z0oY8OiZuIhIw5DXexMw5/tOJ/ZQBjg+fAt37iFfpKZrJbhgoX3zw0/mmFsecvljKEa9 rN2HcOqCTa6z8/utK2TaN24K2ajmrA3zVrn7A= Received: by 10.205.118.133 with SMTP id fq5mr656746bkc.1.1339948594808; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:56:34 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.154.21 with SMTP id m21ls2697049bkw.2.gmail; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.132.81 with SMTP id a17mr1482091bkt.4.1339948593220; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.132.81 with SMTP id a17mr1482090bkt.4.1339948593192; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com [209.85.217.173]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ig3si12280025bkc.3.2012.06.17.08.56.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.173; Received: by lbok6 with SMTP id k6so4281102lbo.4 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:56:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.144.168 with SMTP id sn8mr11653327lab.1.1339948592594; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.46.36 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:56:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:56:32 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiktionary closure proposal. From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f234687e0ff5104c2ad1766 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8f234687e0ff5104c2ad1766 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Arguing that some Lojbanic words do not /need/ transating has nothing to do with whether Lojban needs a dictionary at all. While it is true that lujvo formed by combining the rafsi form of SE with a single gismu is "obvious" in its meaning, we still need a definition of the individual components. There's no point in arguing against the inclusion of certain valsi; Lojban most definitely needs a dictionary, that is the reason we have jbovlaste, vlasisku, etc. As far as which words should be included in a Lojban dictionary- there is no harm in being overly-complete and defining words which may not "need" to be, such as selta'i, but there is harm in being incomplete. It is better to have /all/ words and be assured that all users needs are met, then any other option. In any case, the point of this topic is not to debate the need for a dictionary, nor which words should or should not be included. The purpose is ascertain whether we jbopre care about the existence of the Lojban Wiktionary sepcifically and it's possible (likely) impending deletion. On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Escape Landsome wrote: > No. > > A << concern >> is a word you cannot guess what it means without an > english dictionary > > But a << selta'i >> you can, provided you know "se(l)" and "tatpi/ta'i" > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e89a8f234687e0ff5104c2ad1766 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Arguing that some Lojbanic words do not /need/ transating has nothing to do= with whether Lojban needs a dictionary at all. While it is true that lujvo= formed by combining the rafsi form of SE with a single gismu is "obvi= ous" in its meaning, we still need a definition of the individual comp= onents. There's no point in arguing against the inclusion of certain va= lsi; Lojban most definitely needs a dictionary, that is the reason we have = jbovlaste, vlasisku, etc. As far as which words should be included in a Loj= ban dictionary- there is no harm in being overly-complete and defining word= s which may not "need" to be, such as selta'i, but there is h= arm in being incomplete. It is better to have /all/ words and be assured th= at all users needs are met, then any other option.

In any case, the point of this topic is not to debate the need for a di= ctionary, nor which words should or should not be included. The purpose is = ascertain whether we jbopre care about the existence of the Lojban Wiktiona= ry sepcifically and it's possible (likely) impending deletion.

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Escape Land= some <escaaape@gmail.com> wrote:
No.

A << concern >> is a word you cannot guess what it means withou= t an
english dictionary

But a << selta'i >> you can, provided you know "se(l)&= quot; and "tatpi/ta'i"

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8f234687e0ff5104c2ad1766--