Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:50219)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCK30vq5WEKiJ-P4EGgScd-tH@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1SgIGt-0003cH-Jp; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:24:27 -0700
Received: by ghbf16 with SMTP id f16sf4494367ghb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type:content-disposition;
        bh=FqGVfWXokOuOYLFkqOQyJ5XPkveAgvp4Pve5sFsStao=;
        b=KapywaEMZgGix6lMQdWXvurocG1GF5lzEl2EbtZvA61NUwKge+84e0kIQ2K8h4caIs
         O+JFUsdjnmT/beZPUctOHi1FfYLH5tpB9M0+QAP5RZ+K9xq17KY2DJWPsUauuyS2kr3M
         otXOBHCqlx1pbvQEN/dk+VIypvZoOPCx1Ji8A=
Received: by 10.68.229.132 with SMTP id sq4mr791987pbc.18.1339950248938;
        Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.222.134 with SMTP id qm6ls10427264pbc.6.gmail; Sun, 17 Jun
 2012 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.234.38 with SMTP id ub6mr12868017pbc.2.1339950248572;
        Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.234.38 with SMTP id ub6mr12868016pbc.2.1339950248563;
        Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iq5si187882pbc.1.2012.06.17.09.24.08
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1SgIGl-0003bU-27
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:24:07 -0700
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:24:07 -0700
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiktionary closure proposal.
Message-ID: <20120617162406.GN1445@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <CAMKwHj16NukYUrTku1Cax9FqCTSDjTpx_MKMB1-U2so+w162XQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGO2uOPbec78Fz5V8_b3bNxGp+JFd1pcS6ay9rwUBCnVqihJtA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGO2uOPbec78Fz5V8_b3bNxGp+JFd1pcS6ay9rwUBCnVqihJtA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates
 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Escape Landsome wrote:
> > Google alerts recently informed me of this:
> >
> > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Lojban_Wiktionary
> >
> > Do we care?
> 
> 
> << Attempting to describe Lojban words in Lojban is pretty silly, >>
> 
> There is a point.   By its own nature, isn't lojban vocabulary... "tautologic" ?

No, not at all.  See the lojban definition of klama at
http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/klama , which uses muvdu, for
example.  This is utterly false.

-Robin

-- 
http://singinst.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
.i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e
lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e
lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.