Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:34144)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCMGclZyxExDMnIL_BBoEaD1bMw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1SgzXP-0000ou-0U; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:36:14 -0700
Received: by ghbf16 with SMTP id f16sf6473552ghb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=+8ez1dQybmL0g1TkjDF2bd440azi0pEQoB5vAHhgR/0=;
        b=PdLkElJ0Gibfv1A7G7tSIweDzWHpog4eM89ulS3FNXMO7e+YClviV0cBeglEqbQn/m
         PMVle9lfuwBRQNZIP/nuKjftLakwkHxKDot4vhDn81aqsSiPj+CIBHqWq3S5AjJB7vTP
         0zxYvtkUH0YYC2XP8lmXjqjx398NlZdE4OmBM=
Received: by 10.236.176.66 with SMTP id a42mr858808yhm.5.1340116556217;
        Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.131.237 with SMTP id m73ls3651757yhi.0.gmail; Tue, 19 Jun
 2012 07:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.175.34 with SMTP id c34mr10314322anp.13.1340116555642;
        Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.175.34 with SMTP id c34mr10314320anp.13.1340116555627;
        Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-f181.google.com (mail-gg0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f27si6072383anj.1.2012.06.19.07.35.55
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.181;
Received: by mail-gg0-f181.google.com with SMTP id v5so4856410ggn.12
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.51.132 with SMTP id k4mr1410913igo.17.1340116555073; Tue,
 19 Jun 2012 07:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.15.74 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj1VjKh3wPefa3gqbQz39VDA=aFT1zgVT4s-8Lbz_z__eA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGO2uOPcMjNogyRO8Wi-v+swm60xLR8X21=aykzmcMOh51e0-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<eddd7913-ac3b-4ec2-a72b-9f199852776b@googlegroups.com>
	<CAGO2uONMoF1BfuR+wJNn7y9ecjKg8PTeNHOp8J03JGAwmp5bnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<74243394-F7AA-46CD-B731-21E95827CE6B@yahoo.com>
	<CAGO2uOMAatDoKcdk+1ti46mQ5fudXtPUTL3R1pHgUZ-LODrB6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKwHj1VjKh3wPefa3gqbQz39VDA=aFT1zgVT4s-8Lbz_z__eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:35:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGO2uONCqnvYm89YOhuVPxydRfrZazJrwDDe3B6YcVuTjvvnXA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in
 communication ?
From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: escaaape@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.181 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=escaaape@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

> I contend that confusing words of separate "paradigms" is worse.

And I contend that.

If the confusion arises between two words which pertain to different
paradigm for instance :

QUANTITY = { all, some, many... } and BIRD = { owl, pigeon, crow... }

then it is easy to disambiguate "all" from "owl" because the "???"
(which is = all or = owl) is a quantity or a bird in context, but most
rarely both.

But when the two confusionable words come from the same paradigm-set

QUANTITY = { so'a, so'e, so'i... }

the confusion is VERY harmful

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.