Received: from mail-bk0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:58480) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ShJGB-0000ll-Cs; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:39:50 -0700 Received: by bkcik5 with SMTP id ik5sf4833613bkc.16 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:39:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Nz7P3KdoMkkzCq12XcMteLvqTalIqXEBQsPfofNI1V4=; b=Xa5rMjLOKmFCHEhMb0QCh9NaDLSPoAiGJ0seaVeFryuzoOCRUo6aIKlGtBJgH2E6Tv r5ITEm8XbMSL0Zu1T9e7eEYiRG8eWUFh5hqytdCJkmpGn7kvcY2pdvd6PuOBfTH//iSj j2PmEyPai0BobaoXf+evOu6kFTGzwngY9gjc4= Received: by 10.204.145.83 with SMTP id c19mr1167340bkv.22.1340192375630; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:39:35 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.8.149 with SMTP id h21ls5530785bkh.3.gmail; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.133 with SMTP id o5mr2876333bkw.0.1340192373779; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.133 with SMTP id o5mr2876332bkw.0.1340192373755; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bk0-f47.google.com (mail-bk0-f47.google.com [209.85.214.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5si287698bks.1.2012.06.20.04.39.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.47; Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id jm2so6665301bkc.20 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:39:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.144.168 with SMTP id sn8mr22190448lab.1.1340192373542; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.46.36 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:39:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:39:33 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ? From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2346875b104704c2e5daea X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8f2346875b104704c2e5daea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:13 AM, tijlan wrote: > Also crucial is the changing social structures & norms. How often do > we say "he or she" for the lack of a better pronoun to refer to the > increasingly common gender-irrelevant sets of individuals? Would you > expect a 'random natural' process to give birth to a good neuter to > replace this inefficient three-word phrase? > Since that process is causing the replacement to be "they", I personally say no. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e89a8f2346875b104704c2e5daea Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:13 AM, tijlan <jbot= ijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
Also crucial is the changing social structures & norms. How often do we say "he or she" for the lack of a better pronoun to refer to t= he
increasingly common gender-irrelevant sets of individuals? Would you
expect a 'random natural' process to give birth to a good neuter to=
replace this inefficient three-word phrase?

Since= that process is causing the replacement to be "they", I personal= ly say no.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'= o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8f2346875b104704c2e5daea--