Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]:61262) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ShTbm-0007ef-Ks; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:42:43 -0700 Received: by yenl13 with SMTP id l13sf8259624yen.16 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:42:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dcQA4XTOz4MxTgmBUPmGTqxxTyvArqclPD3sxxit1IQ=; b=nxWluUX4O5ubE08FxVcxRhdqyDu8nrLYZjUwXK0zynv5Hua23LsB8xW2c1iXoygD8I yMhS1DkgnjMFbD2JM4RWrXJhpkePwlPQj3CoePpxe6w5lESO2JRxgtyUc9H3caDj4lQm aEzVbpnXSt/O+BUujHOgQ0VMZAWuzXyI9VDVo= Received: by 10.50.237.10 with SMTP id uy10mr827962igc.3.1340232156331; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:42:36 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.157.164 with SMTP id wn4ls5736545igb.0.canary; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.213.98 with SMTP id nr2mr5229746igc.5.1340232155620; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.100.229 with SMTP id fb5msigb; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.235.37 with SMTP id uj5mr391664pbc.13.1340212333774; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:12:13 -0700 (PDT) From: "la .lindar." To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <000eea56-0a1e-4f54-8862-3cc817d539e1@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <74243394-F7AA-46CD-B731-21E95827CE6B@yahoo.com> <5fbb3fd1-8c00-42a4-9dac-e9889e69757f@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: lindarthebard@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2263_6626518.1340212333183" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_2263_6626518.1340212333183 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tuesday, 19 June 2012 22:22:16 UTC-7, Escape Landsome wrote: > > > So? > > What's your point? > > > This comes as a direct consequence of my question, don't you see it ? > > This makes us wonder if words should not be created in some way that > allows more entropy. > Maybe I'm not being super to-the-point here, so let me be even more rude and blunt: Stop being an asshole. We all know that Lojban has problems. You're harping on this like you expect everybody to drop everything and say, "OH FUCK! Well, I guess you're right. God damn, now we have to start over...". I'm asking you what your point is because I can only extrapolate that you expect everybody to give up on Lojban and start from scratch keeping your point in mind. If that isn't your point, then what the fuck are you getting at; what do you expect us to do with this information? If it is your point, then we all get it (and knew that thousands of years ago) and you can stop bleeding the wound. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/jj37asHsvYcJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_2263_6626518.1340212333183 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, 19 June 2012 22:22:16 UTC-7, Escape Landsome wrote:> So?
> What's your point?


This comes as a direct consequence of my question, don't you see it ?

This makes us wonder if words should not be created in some way that
allows more entropy.

Maybe I'm not being super to-the-point= here, so let me be even more rude and blunt:

Stop= being an asshole. We all know that Lojban has problems. You're harping on = this like you expect everybody to drop everything and say, "OH FUCK! Well, = I guess you're right. God damn, now we have to start over...". I'm asking y= ou what your point is because I can only extrapolate that you expect everyb= ody to give up on Lojban and start from scratch keeping your point in mind.= If that isn't your point, then what the fuck are you getting at; what do y= ou expect us to do with this information? If it is your point, then we all = get it (and knew that thousands of years ago) and you can stop bleeding the= wound.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/jj= 37asHsvYcJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_2263_6626518.1340212333183--