Received: from mail-qa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:47393) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ShXHv-0000jZ-ED; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:38:39 -0700 Received: by qadb10 with SMTP id b10sf1145459qad.16 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:38:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-yahoo-newman-id:x-yahoo-newman-property :x-ymail-osg:x-yahoo-smtp:references:in-reply-to :x-apple-yahoo-original-message-folder:mime-version:message-id :x-mailer:from:x-apple-yahoo-replied-msgid:subject:date:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cgUsp38jClBHz7u+r8c6Q0nfI++8hyhgRVG5DrsL3Dg=; b=ZyCslapTb6DJPrShAe35kmnk+4dp//+kiJJRlXZsnvZsOr2XSy7MGZ74hWlQYK3Aul Z8o6lKFog2t2V+GZWyn5O/nyE6zmioFjeKvAr62ekc8iquWCLsu1SuVhu6mzTaKEPf6w BbRTq6YE7PJM6dYdbRQTynCw+l6u4irng1OJk= Received: by 10.224.184.10 with SMTP id ci10mr1165474qab.13.1340246300845; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:38:20 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.134.212 with SMTP id k20ls37102qct.6.gmail; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.107.199 with SMTP id c7mr16315094qap.5.1340246299321; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.107.199 with SMTP id c7mr16315092qap.5.1340246299297; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm14-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (nm14-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com. [98.139.52.234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id t17si6809470qco.0.2012.06.20.19.38.19; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.52.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.52.234; Received: from [98.139.52.189] by nm14.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Jun 2012 02:38:19 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.165] by tm2.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Jun 2012 02:38:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1048.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Jun 2012 02:38:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 160764.19127.bm@omp1048.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 45402 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2012 02:38:18 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: B6pfXYkVM1l_rz5p74pM_dvDKBqYsCT42Ck9zwcjH34ZDAa fNnYmntFbSJywK5uvEZYNcTUv6b1sH62AKepIAKP30oj_iA0PYVJWnCgqMPJ 1MD.KB26uKIXpdAWgXsSUFktwDvYQO6Xqam8cq1HAFRJWtHi48tpXj3OEIRD rff5LND7vW_ETEdIEHKMQZNZDlIgUE2I3JxXhJn2L39Ml46HCpAS.xtFkbmv GTeiPsQVkV3HJS1jxlqyM6SObgtXlYkMqHirvdXQAp4hP.dJ8YRee_gNRnCd CoIe8tsLzzJQWzXxj8u_gtD6_PTo_SV1z5.ewd3kAVMPOrfPog.v_VdHRfq1 ewn.HIjeKiZcCy.dSl0mtBXg4cKyUHZrQb02kHNmQi1xpxH8JZoP89RtPI5N y6Hxt0M4w31fnn4hYBhihoOq3aup93n3Q.HPxNnEsEWZsLasrtkok0r4FS7k XJ5uiS9EQgNzqSbEWdZFG1ft71MKQU3Toj9oovJObLhfQu5CkuTz1kfkaeII T9czb X-Yahoo-SMTP: xvGyF4GswBCIFKGaxf5wSjlg3RF108g- Received: from [192.168.1.73] (kali9putra@99.92.108.194 with xymcookie) by smtp102-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jun 2012 19:38:18 -0700 PDT References: <74243394-F7AA-46CD-B731-21E95827CE6B@yahoo.com> <5fbb3fd1-8c00-42a4-9dac-e9889e69757f@googlegroups.com> <000eea56-0a1e-4f54-8862-3cc817d539e1@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <000eea56-0a1e-4f54-8862-3cc817d539e1@googlegroups.com> X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder: AAlojbanery Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8G4) Message-Id: <17D145C4-8AAD-424D-8993-5698584E7FD9@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8G4) From: "John E. Clifford" X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid: 2_0_0_48_15030404_ACjdi2IAACZGT+JR3gIBn2vdb2Y Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ? Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:54:14 -0500 To: "lojban@googlegroups.com" X-Original-Sender: kali9putra@yahoo.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kali9putra@yahoo.com designates 98.139.52.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kali9putra@yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@yahoo.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2--984679837 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --Apple-Mail-2--984679837 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Well, as a suggestion against the distant day that Lojban might be used in = a noisier channel than print and small group hyper focused conversation, so= meone might think a bit about what redundancy devices (if any) Lojban has f= or potentially confusing slots. Since this day is unlikely to occur, this = is merely a theoretical exercise, but at least we could say we have thought= of the matter the next time issue comes up (less often than once every fiv= e years, I think, though no one seems to have been moved to action by the l= ast couple of rounds either). Sent from my iPad On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:12 PM, "la .lindar." wrote= : >=20 >=20 > On Tuesday, 19 June 2012 22:22:16 UTC-7, Escape Landsome wrote: > > So?=20 > > What's your point?=20 >=20 >=20 > This comes as a direct consequence of my question, don't you see it ?=20 >=20 > This makes us wonder if words should not be created in some way that=20 > allows more entropy.=20 >=20 > Maybe I'm not being super to-the-point here, so let me be even more rude = and blunt: >=20 > Stop being an asshole. We all know that Lojban has problems. You're harpi= ng on this like you expect everybody to drop everything and say, "OH FUCK! = Well, I guess you're right. God damn, now we have to start over...". I'm as= king you what your point is because I can only extrapolate that you expect = everybody to give up on Lojban and start from scratch keeping your point in= mind. If that isn't your point, then what the fuck are you getting at; wha= t do you expect us to do with this information? If it is your point, then w= e all get it (and knew that thousands of years ago) and you can stop bleedi= ng the wound. > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/= lojban/-/jj37asHsvYcJ. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojb= an?hl=3Den. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --Apple-Mail-2--984679837 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Well, as a suggestion against the dist= ant day that Lojban might be used in a noisier channel than print and small= group hyper focused conversation, someone might think a bit about what red= undancy devices (if any) Lojban has for potentially confusing slots.  = Since this day is unlikely to occur, this is merely a theoretical exercise,= but at least we could say we have thought of the matter the next time issu= e comes up (less often than once every five years, I think, though no one s= eems to have been moved to action by the last couple of rounds either).
=
Sent from my iPad

On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:12 PM, "la .lind= ar." <lindarthebard@gmail.com= > wrote:


=
On Tuesday, 19 June 2012 22:22:16 UTC-7, Escape Landsome wrote:> So?
> What's your point?


This comes as a direct consequence of my question, don't you see it ?

This makes us wonder if words should not be created in some way that
allows more entropy.

Maybe I'm not being super to-the-point= here, so let me be even more rude and blunt:

Stop= being an asshole. We all know that Lojban has problems. You're harping on = this like you expect everybody to drop everything and say, "OH FUCK! Well, = I guess you're right. God damn, now we have to start over...". I'm asking y= ou what your point is because I can only extrapolate that you expect everyb= ody to give up on Lojban and start from scratch keeping your point in mind.= If that isn't your point, then what the fuck are you getting at; what do y= ou expect us to do with this information? If it is your point, then we all = get it (and knew that thousands of years ago) and you can stop bleeding the= wound.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/jj37asHsvYc= J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--Apple-Mail-2--984679837--