Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]:41725) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Shduj-0003mG-VI; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:42:59 -0700 Received: by daek18 with SMTP id k18sf522147dae.16 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:42:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LTmYUUQ7yeMJYsFDEm/69SgMOYjc/goV0Z85+0YKThw=; b=O9OohsmixJ9gMGXn35x1R4GfLKk2gar248WdebcWE0EGtHhKMp0acekAFk+RC88lgd 42p/90/ZVfny9N8kbYvHgnpSeCwuBRzpFW3r4L2qYgr7KSCO8ce1tSOv/PcefVojapEB ixQFFumGIg6i0d3prBEZ82c0O8kHFvI1voRMA= Received: by 10.50.187.136 with SMTP id fs8mr1115004igc.2.1340271771586; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:42:51 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.157.164 with SMTP id wn4ls6108835igb.0.canary; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.12.225 with SMTP id b1mr5974453igc.1.1340271770823; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.12.225 with SMTP id b1mr5974452igc.1.1340271770808; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com (mail-ob0-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cv4si6431259igc.0.2012.06.21.02.42.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.178; Received: by obbwd20 with SMTP id wd20so908176obb.23 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:42:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.172.209 with SMTP id be17mr9562952oec.16.1340271770461; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.46.36 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 02:42:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <74243394-F7AA-46CD-B731-21E95827CE6B@yahoo.com> <5fbb3fd1-8c00-42a4-9dac-e9889e69757f@googlegroups.com> <000eea56-0a1e-4f54-8862-3cc817d539e1@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:42:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ? From: tijlan To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: paskios@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of paskios@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=paskios@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On 21 June 2012 08:01, Escape Landsome wrote: > In any case, I don't attack YOU, nor even your "faith", but would you > say that a man that would complain to Russell about problems with the > set y =3D {x | x =E2=88=89 x} would be "an asshole" ? > > Well, he would be if you take the things too much emotionally, but I > rather think he would be a great scientist. Except that the aspect you are characterizing as a 'problem' of Lojban, is conditional. It could be a problem in particular (e.g. noisy) situations but not in other situations. If we are to try to be good scientists, we have to first determine whether there is a reason to believe that the conditions for the suspected problem are or will be common enough to warrant a remodelling or disposal of the subject. Otherwise it's like blaming aircraft for having the possibility of stall at an unnecessary altitude. > The fact that > Natlangs do have some glimpses of this problem too is not relevant, > because in most case this concerns pairs of concepts very near such as > "ran"/"run" where the unguessable feature is [PAST]/[PRESENT]. =C2=A0 But > here so'V =3D QUANTITY =3D { all, none, many, a few ... } is A WHOLE > PARADIGM. "Run/ran" as well as "push/pushed" etc. belong to the paradigm of TENSE, just as {so'a/so'e/...} belong to the paradigm of QUANTITY. For each group, the meaning can be put at stake by the lack of one particular phoneme. In the cases of cost/cost cut/cut hit/hit hurt/hurt let/let put/put quit/quit set/set shut/shut ... , no phonemic clue is available at all. mu'o --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.