Received: from mail-wi0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]:45345) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SiZO1-0002rF-DL; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:05:15 -0700 Received: by wibhr14 with SMTP id hr14sf494872wib.16 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:04:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to :to:references:message-id:x-mailer:x-provags-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=EOzKH9rjMllNdTrQMt8JIBNzTkHEK0+spxTaQS4aum8=; b=2YTQzExZfKYgSNQe1uJgQy1qFnUza32WST3vCMlArkBlYYT3x7iyGO5R9415Tqi03Q pCwNeZDJ7O+HoocAcrk4Wtd4qfhPKdJjz3HZXOX9EmJcVFEwWzZ/JHLEmnZdmL7wyFu8 or2eoZC9BZD1Zuis1ZFm/RVKGo7FppkIEV+0A= Received: by 10.180.24.70 with SMTP id s6mr725021wif.2.1340492694177; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:04:54 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.181.12.12 with SMTP id em12ls362356wid.2.gmail; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.19.70 with SMTP id c6mr964485wie.4.1340492693638; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.118.69 with SMTP id k47msweh; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.106.199 with SMTP id gw7mr645479wib.0.1340492672660; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.106.199 with SMTP id gw7mr645478wib.0.1340492672647; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de. [212.227.17.10]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e10si904784wiz.3.2012.06.23.16.04.32; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 212.227.17.10 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of kozmikreis@lojban.org.uk) client-ip=212.227.17.10; Received: from [192.168.0.5] (82-71-48-121.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.71.48.121]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LvNfb-1RinYp0GAt-010SBl; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 01:04:32 +0200 From: kozmikreis Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiktionary closure proposal. Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:04:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <59abbc57-3da2-4e58-a61d-f1d08bc78329@googlegroups.com> <4C5DB69B-9635-421D-87CB-A18058D2B487@lojban.org.uk> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:xpAlAzkajVd8o94CUIezguYiHCFu9WDQ5MQqCLNHxuO iJrlh9bHnvFgPIF3vMsqP/jAKzQLoysCXtC7MlraDnr7McXKB9 a35k+kPb7jbGD19KubchRQrCM+4wOu1KuK5gYxJl7fNsvvfdG8 BWrXpTdRY+9+SQ+WqrQZcssb6pUGnB9YmBZMLchASNtpfb+eV+ PQtxjMZNYA/KvdSuReXlXa+km0Ghhe0VKolGT0t3+Ah2FC+8cR sJshwX8Dv+wl0pfAjsy5dwTO4IiM9ZlJ6fazlVd/BrRIakHm6G 913eeg8vLuPXrpzYhXdKHKRD2pM2dG1uWR/PILa+SOqmuPcEpp wago4Ou9sj63DnsBLi18pZnWbJNN0EfJtkM85qVQBoDsIk9/vK jld0AgdCFLhDA== X-Original-Sender: kozmikreis@lojban.org.uk X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 212.227.17.10 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of kozmikreis@lojban.org.uk) smtp.mail=kozmikreis@lojban.org.uk Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7115BAF3-E995-4819-88C9-C9681902F49C" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --Apple-Mail=_7115BAF3-E995-4819-88C9-C9681902F49C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 23 Jun 2012, at 23:43, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:46 AM, kozmikreis wr= ote: > On 21 Jun 2012, at 10:30, osiris_hades_deathland@hotmail.com wrote: >=20 >> n Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:32:38 AM UTC-4, aionys wrote: >> Google alerts recently informed me of this:=20 >>=20 >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of= _Lojban_Wiktionary >>=20 >> Do we care? >>=20 >> --=20 >> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>=20 >> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>=20 >> I think we should keep it. Lojban already suffers from obscurity. We nee= d all the visibility we can muster.=20 >=20 > I wholeheartedly agree. It's a good enough resource for beginners and it= brings visibility and credence. Is there any harm in keeping it, and if n= ot how do we go about making an actionable objection to its loss beyond wha= t's otherwise merely an academic discussion on a mailing list? I don't und= erstand what criteria needs to be met. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > kozmikreis >=20 > As I've already said: >=20 > If you think the Lojban Wiktionary should not be deleted, you need to say= so /on the page I linked/. Nothing said on this thread reaches the people = that have a say in the matter. The page you've linked to gives reasons to close the project, some are stat= ed as if there are some criteria, most likely derived from http://meta.wiki= media.org/wiki/Closing_projects_policy , that could be met to keep it. I d= oubt random people adding "ohai, i luvs ur pages, plz keepz xxx" would suff= ice ;-) As I've already said: I don't understand what criteria needs to be met. kozmikreis --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --Apple-Mail=_7115BAF3-E995-4819-88C9-C9681902F49C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 23 Jun 2012, = at 23:43, Jonathan Jones wrote:

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012= at 9:46 AM, kozmikreis <kozmikreis@lojban.org.uk> wr= ote:
On 21 Jun 2= 012, at 10:30, osiris_hades_deathland@hotmail.com wrote:

n Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:32:38 AM UTC-4, aionys wrote:
Google alerts recently informed me of this: 

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/C= losure_of_Lojban_Wiktionary

Do we care?

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'= ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to= the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

I think we should keep it. Lojban already suffers from = obscurity. We need all the visibility we can muster. 

I wholeheartedly agree.  It's a good enough res= ource for beginners and it brings visibility and credence.  Is there a= ny harm in keeping it, and if not how do we go about making an actionable o= bjection to its loss beyond what's otherwise merely an academic discussion = on a mailing list?  I don't understand what criteria needs to be met.<= /div>

Thanks,

kozmikreis
=

As I've already said:

If you think the Lojban = Wiktionary should not be deleted, you need to=20 say so /on the page I linked/. Nothing said on this thread reaches the=20 people that have a say in the matter.

The page you've linked to gives reasons to close the project, some ar= e stated as if there are some criteria, most likely derived from http://meta.w= ikimedia.org/wiki/Closing_projects_policy , that could be met= to keep it.  I doubt random people adding "ohai, i luvs ur pages, plz= keepz xxx" would suffice ;-)

As I've already said= :

I don't understand what criteria needs to be met= .

kozmikreis

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--Apple-Mail=_7115BAF3-E995-4819-88C9-C9681902F49C--