Received: from mail-bk0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:42543) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SibWV-0003Z4-8e; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:22:05 -0700 Received: by bkcik5 with SMTP id ik5sf2086520bkc.16 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:21:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=8LoUi6kHQAch4uMwW0aP9Auk8KPcjXDRpjR5CMMztUU=; b=YXpbY+BkoWGKYtk3G2j9gZaFX7IZYIt1cEYkwXVQofPbNYzArJhGPpqT7j7Dgi71ub McfBp5IAv/DYZiiHYsCuVx/Gp6yxTlpGVFp0PT689m+NaFWHe91RSWcVjxQ2cMWYRz7o wDl9dshhiVwdH2KqChFP8HqWE4Ws1665O9g7o= Received: by 10.216.27.148 with SMTP id e20mr183507wea.10.1340500903204; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:21:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.104.161 with SMTP id gf1ls979464wib.1.canary; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.207.232 with SMTP id n82mr328388weo.0.1340500902325; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.207.232 with SMTP id n82mr328387weo.0.1340500902307; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a10si1235867wix.2.2012.06.23.18.21.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.175; Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1498913wib.10 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:21:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.240.72 with SMTP id d50mr3549276wer.29.1340500902147; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.195.211 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:21:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <59abbc57-3da2-4e58-a61d-f1d08bc78329@googlegroups.com> <4C5DB69B-9635-421D-87CB-A18058D2B487@lojban.org.uk> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:21:41 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban Wiktionary closure proposal. From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4e38525017f75604c32db017 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --e0cb4e38525017f75604c32db017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:04 PM, kozmikreis wrote: > On 23 Jun 2012, at 23:43, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:46 AM, kozmikreis wrote: > >> On 21 Jun 2012, at 10:30, osiris_hades_deathland@hotmail.com wrote: >> >> n Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:32:38 AM UTC-4, aionys wrote: >>> >>> Google alerts recently informed me of this: >> >> >>> >>> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Lojban_Wiktionary >>> >>> Do we care? >>> >>> -- >>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>> >>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>> >> >> I think we should keep it. Lojban already suffers from obscurity. We need >> all the visibility we can muster. >> >> >> I wholeheartedly agree. It's a good enough resource for beginners and it >> brings visibility and credence. Is there any harm in keeping it, and if >> not how do we go about making an actionable objection to its loss beyond >> what's otherwise merely an academic discussion on a mailing list? I don't >> understand what criteria needs to be met. >> >> Thanks, >> >> kozmikreis >> > > As I've already said: > > If you think the Lojban Wiktionary should not be deleted, you need to say > so /on the page I linked/. Nothing said on this thread reaches the people > that have a say in the matter. > > > The page you've linked to gives reasons to close the project > No, the page I've linked to is /the proposal/, with votes for or against and the reasons for those votes listed below. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e0cb4e38525017f75604c32db017 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:04 PM, kozmikreis <kozmikreis@lojban.org.uk> wrote:
On 23 Jun 2= 012, at 23:43, Jonathan Jones wrote:

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:46 AM, kozmikreis <kozmikreis@lojban.org.uk> wrote:
On 21 Jun 2012, at 10:30= , o= siris_hades_deathland@hotmail.com wrote:

n Sunday, June 17, 2012 9:32:38 AM UTC-4, aionys wrote:
Google alerts recently informed me of this:=A0

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals= _for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Lojban_Wiktionary

Do we care?

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.
<= br>.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo&#= 39;o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

I think we should keep it. Lojban already suffers from = obscurity. We need all the visibility we can muster.=A0
<= br>
I wholeheartedly agree. =A0It's a good enough resou= rce for beginners and it brings visibility and credence. =A0Is there any ha= rm in keeping it, and if not how do we go about making an actionable object= ion to its loss beyond what's otherwise merely an academic discussion o= n a mailing list? =A0I don't understand what criteria needs to be met.<= /div>

Thanks,

kozmikreis
=

As I've already said:

If you think the Loj= ban Wiktionary should not be deleted, you need to=20 say so /on the page I linked/. Nothing said on this thread reaches the=20 people that have a say in the matter.

The page you've linked to gives reasons to close the projec= t


No, the page I've = linked to is /the proposal/, with votes for or against and the reasons for = those votes listed below.

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko c= mima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the = Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e0cb4e38525017f75604c32db017--