Received: from mail-ee0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:61080) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SioJp-0000fI-Sk; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:01:46 -0700 Received: by eekb57 with SMTP id b57sf2383640eek.16 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:01:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=aU8c68F1PGQHov/oPwdr5lfESBsW9qQ+TUlBMkgn56A=; b=vqf+nBjj4oVJOvp7JryfweaVxJURobIX0GMi2XRHiNnHhGAXuIAFyT+UsADzsPUBiG U6xZ+RxNc3t/NXrRHXv3GPP1/6OU31YJXfLLlA/apLgGF7TePJs8mL1wcEc8s8YSPuxK EK0oAHuz93jtFCKgTcT7haVW70Mz5XATpXohI= Received: by 10.204.152.3 with SMTP id e3mr411006bkw.31.1340550094321; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:01:34 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.205.129.148 with SMTP id hi20ls3031004bkc.0.gmail; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.141.4 with SMTP id k4mr913226bku.6.1340550093522; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.141.4 with SMTP id k4mr913224bku.6.1340550093459; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com (mail-lb0-f180.google.com [209.85.217.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ig3si10744136bkc.3.2012.06.24.08.01.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.180; Received: by lbbgj3 with SMTP id gj3so6002196lbb.11 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:01:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.144.168 with SMTP id sn8mr8916455lab.1.1340550093080; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.46.36 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:01:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <74243394-F7AA-46CD-B731-21E95827CE6B@yahoo.com> <5fbb3fd1-8c00-42a4-9dac-e9889e69757f@googlegroups.com> <000eea56-0a1e-4f54-8862-3cc817d539e1@googlegroups.com> <9cb9e4c0-f3fa-4183-8582-f14de670148c@googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 09:01:33 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ? From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2346871a0a2204c339245c X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8f2346871a0a2204c339245c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Also "scientificity" isn't a word. On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Escape Landsome wrote: > >> > EVIDENCE is date gathered from experiments designed to support or >> refute a >> > hypothesis. >> >> * In hard science like Mathematics or Physics, yes >> > > No, in *ALL* science. If there is no experimentation, it *ISN'T* science. > > While it is true that the so-called "soft" sciences such a psychology, > sociology, et al., are usually incapable of coming to concrete conclusions, > they still use *experiments* to accrue *evidence* of their *hypotheses*. > > Your mathematical formulae have no basis in any kind of experimenting, and > thusly can not be given any higher regard than numbers which are *completely > made up*. You must have experiments to back up your claim, for without > them, that's all you have; a *claim*. > > Furthermore, even after repeatedly being requested to do so, you have *yet > * to provide a reason for *why you've brought this up in the first place*. > > I am not a "believer". I hold my opinion for the simple reason that there > is no evidence to the contrary. > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e89a8f2346871a0a2204c339245c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also "scientificity" isn't a word.

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Jonathan Jones &= lt;eyeonus@gmail.com= > wrote:


On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail= .com> wrote:
> EVIDENCE is date gathered from experiments designed to support or= refute a
> hypothesis.

* In hard science like Mathematics or Physics, yes
<= /blockquote>

No, in ALL science. If ther= e is no experimentation, it ISN'T science.

While it is true that the so-called "soft" sciences such a psycho= logy, sociology, et al., are usually incapable of coming to concrete conclu= sions, they still use experiments to accrue evidence of their= hypotheses.

Your mathematical formulae have no basis in any kind of experimenting, = and thusly can not be given any higher regard than numbers which are com= pletely made up. You must have experiments to back up your claim, for w= ithout them, that's all you have; a claim.

Furthermore, even after repeatedly being requested to do so, you have <= i>yet to provide a reason for why you've brought this up in the = first place.

I am not a "believer". I hold my opinion = for the simple reason that there is no evidence to the contrary.

--
mu'o mi&= #39;e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.lu= k. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. := D )




--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8f2346871a0a2204c339245c--