Received: from mail-qa0-f62.google.com ([209.85.216.62]:65280) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SiotH-0000v7-P4; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:38:26 -0700 Received: by qaea17 with SMTP id a17sf2596943qae.27 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:38:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=aK/VggKRk42LgZb/hwjKz6JI0FLBI9BxWYg/Uy1VJkw=; b=u83qwP4LqEMk/sELT9etW4yfsZntScx7IZwRESzl2YU2mIf2gyA7yYgBr382LFEC37 /1D0vQr939mCqIeBIje/sqO3fnSU+iflI0c30hvzGGp4+emBhiR9sGMG/xplEQKNERqv mhDXDKtA8g+DnLlEsXqlaQrKoaBMyjmVBXU00= Received: by 10.236.80.70 with SMTP id j46mr196100yhe.11.1340552293181; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:38:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.81.101 with SMTP id l65ls4729026yhe.5.gmail; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.173.230 with SMTP id v66mr16637312yhl.4.1340552292022; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.173.230 with SMTP id v66mr16637310yhl.4.1340552292012; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com (mail-yx0-f174.google.com [209.85.213.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q35si21544426yhe.6.2012.06.24.08.38.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.174; Received: by yenl2 with SMTP id l2so2350022yen.19 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:38:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.81.17 with SMTP id x17mr3910011ick.5.1340552291836; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.15.74 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:38:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <74243394-F7AA-46CD-B731-21E95827CE6B@yahoo.com> <5fbb3fd1-8c00-42a4-9dac-e9889e69757f@googlegroups.com> <000eea56-0a1e-4f54-8862-3cc817d539e1@googlegroups.com> <9cb9e4c0-f3fa-4183-8582-f14de670148c@googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 17:38:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ? From: Escape Landsome To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: escaaape@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=escaaape@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / What is wanted from an engineer is not only to measure things or make correct proofs of theorem but also to have a right sense of magnitudes of values. That is, when I studied physics (and not philosophy, as you would have guessed), my teachers asked me to prove that no human would experiment gravity in a hollow Earth, or that some satellite would fall with the speed V, but *also* they saked tricky questions, such as : "what is your volume ?", and you had to answer "roughly 70 liters", since you reason qualitatively thus : "my body is mainly water (more than 80%) and 1liter of water is 1kg, and I weigh 70kg, so my countenance is 70 liter" This is qualitative intuitive estimation, and is accepted as good in science and engineering ! - I deeply regret that you have no INTUITION of what linguistic entropy is, for if that were the case, you would see as SOMETHING OBVIOUS that S(lojbanic example) far exceeds S(example in natlang) One acknowledged interpretation of linguistic entropy is that when you have approximately n responses that could do the guess, and all k others that are too rare or too strange, as the computation shows, the k contributions are negligible, and roughly the mean value will be the same as a choice between n choices. Since then, you see by immediate intuitive estimation, analogous to the ones you would do in engineering, that mean value of S must lie between log_2(1) an log_2(3), for the most often cases have between 1 and 3 possible alternatives, and more than 3 is rare in a paradigm. Thus, mean value is between 0 and 1.58. This is rough estimation but this is science. - But you insist on having (unnecessary) precise study, this is rather boring, since you are in the same posture that somebody would would not accept that the distance from Paris to the Moon is far greater than from Paris to Moscow, since he hasn't a PRECISE value. You insist on having precise values instead of estimation of magnitudes, when the latter suffices vastly. This is a way to make yourself boring, and to lock to debate with the kind of trick somebody could use in a debate where he doesn't accept the evident truth. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.