Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:49659) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sirqz-00025f-Nt; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:48:11 -0700 Received: by yhq56 with SMTP id 56sf4004746yhq.16 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:48:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-disposition; bh=U/zIuYzYAdFbH6ogcokkVRPnEJzJUc5GkOIUzyKEAsY=; b=Hcp48xrU55NxvLGrmv/hgsVFllIElgYUyUsRWWXHRq9Oeb+LobUELO3ITVv2r78HQp +PT7ODeTg+ba83WDn0EfrwQawf1ALeAn7UavZg0kQ75yUXi+rSeZMC5Za8nrxyv0HfB9 y8samkLxuhJFhfLBBEafODumOS6GC/Q/4w0jk= Received: by 10.68.235.37 with SMTP id uj5mr1003914pbc.13.1340563683196; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:48:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.233.198 with SMTP id ty6ls11884622pbc.2.gmail; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.223.40 with SMTP id qr8mr10784689pbc.0.1340563682122; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.223.40 with SMTP id qr8mr10784687pbc.0.1340563682112; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tf10si274871pbc.0.2012.06.24.11.48.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:48:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sirqr-00025b-2C for lojban@googlegroups.com; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:48:01 -0700 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:48:01 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: {fa'a} and expressing "towards" in Lojban. Message-ID: <20120624184800.GV392@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com References: <5b45b636-9709-4409-a900-f7442b7e6603@googlegroups.com> <201206240905.21524.phma@phma.optus.nu> <4FE713D0.7020808@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4FE713D0.7020808@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:19:12PM +0200, selpa'i wrote: > Am 24.06.2012 15:05, schrieb Pierre Abbat: > >hy not teka'a?And what is the relation between {to'o} and > >{tefa'a}? > > > >"lo gerku cu bajra to'o do' means that the dog is away from you > >where he runs. To indicate that he runs away from you, say "mo'i > >to'o". > > {to'o do} says that the event is oriented away from {do}. Since > bajra contains motion already, you don't need {mo'i}, and in fact, > it would mean something else entirely with {mo'i}: "The [event of > the] dog running is moving away from you", which might mean that > the dog is running in whatever direction while being on a train > that is moving away from you. > > {lo gerku cu bajra to'o do} is therefore the correct way to say > it. Hmmm. This contradicts what I just posted, but what you say makes sense. The problem that I have with it is that it means that {to'o} and {mo'i to'o} mean different things depending on whether or not the underlying bridi is inherently about motion. Upon further reflection, I don't think that's OK. Hmm. Upon further further reflection :), it's also not *true*; {to'o/fa'a} calls upon the intrinsict directionality of the event, no matter what event it is; some have it, some done. {mo'i fa'a/to'o} moves the entire event around in real space, regardless of the event's intrinsic anything. *Interesting*. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.