Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:55494)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCMGclZyxExDI7af_BBoEfNsN8w@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1SjZw2-0002Vi-6z; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:52:26 -0700
Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23sf142680vbz.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=tTcseb9LCHVsKSFZxiRsEsVCeBMn3ht5x3Z/ckMyI3o=;
        b=MoQZ6nOlE66HXzWZH0LH81akvVnLTEa/U3CRKP0SSSPgap//UNC27Q4JyFFJ5RTcnH
         3aIXuU1MM0cNmPgV78x9THT7nM6Elh5BHYDGhC2SFQw+4yYGRtxLDuBlRAl1HWG7cc88
         NYBuhlpHv4nsaU0O+fH/rYUTQIib1z4jl2//o=
Received: by 10.236.191.197 with SMTP id g45mr2366001yhn.7.1340733128578;
        Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.118.171 with SMTP id l31ls903522yhh.0.gmail; Tue, 26 Jun
 2012 10:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.156.196 with SMTP id m44mr29391255yhk.9.1340733127484;
        Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.156.196 with SMTP id m44mr29391253yhk.9.1340733127440;
        Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gh0-f175.google.com (mail-gh0-f175.google.com [209.85.160.175])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n15si8762706anq.2.2012.06.26.10.52.07
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.175;
Received: by mail-gh0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z2so203112ghb.6
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.94.196 with SMTP id de4mr2179896igb.17.1340733127110; Tue,
 26 Jun 2012 10:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.15.74 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALm==BURsTX7-b6tsZO8R7Xm2CYKF3=YQZ2szHDW1DooE-kY=A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGO2uOPdh+KtGZq1BUoiaswjWeK7OfTzPQsnVVxvgE24pCJr0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALm==BWNr3UCwNCe6M1VydfEHqztcaf3d_bHW7AME5Sp9cYV5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGO2uONDZS0eG5UNFao4=TpxGqRzhGGk9rkyFV9N1LW1J-oJ7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALm==BURsTX7-b6tsZO8R7Xm2CYKF3=YQZ2szHDW1DooE-kY=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:52:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGO2uONPzE7afo65nwSXHUjMbbX0TdLfdVZBNtAe-YGOM-Be6w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] A wiki to work on TERMINOLOGY problems
From: Escape Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: escaaape@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of escaaape@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=escaaape@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

>> But somebody else can re-use this word to make it say something
>> slightly different, --- and this is regarded as a fair move
>
>
> This is antithetical to something I believe to be fundamental to lojban,
> namely a strong and active attempt to avoid polysemy.


Maybe tiny divergence of meaning and/or interpretation can be assumed.

Yeah, you may argue that |R is archimedian, so that plenty tiny
ambiguities eventually lead to hermeneutic disaster.

I say this should be debated.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.