Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:59861) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SjqUk-0001Af-It; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 04:33:18 -0700 Received: by ghbf16 with SMTP id f16sf950368ghb.16 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 04:33:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=PgwI3oC+W9/Au9B7vzyTPWc6otD563ispfkm6z7TSmQ=; b=FbfyYA+Ebwu7BfIPHPpi3fdauRdTbWVR7V8xIJoXLGqChCZPLqupMfy2LU0+n6G+ip 3ktcBMivYpTlXmM7dAvvd16gFldNVojEPAWt3guxlioOVsAZ5p0X/IKnM+2JJcgK4KZk oy31iftUUQ11msJE2ZFYBa6Xsp+xOqHn5CV6Y= Received: by 10.236.108.198 with SMTP id q46mr85311yhg.8.1340796788186; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 04:33:08 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.93.48 with SMTP id k36ls2047255yhf.6.gmail; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 04:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.176.66 with SMTP id a42mr93988yhm.5.1340796787543; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 04:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 04:33:06 -0700 (PDT) From: gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [lojban] Re: age MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_216_16320385.1340796786631" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_216_16320385.1340796786631 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 3:10:18 PM UTC+4, remod wrote: > > I was trying to say "the 'I Ching' is a book more than 5000 years old". > > The first problem I encountered is {cukta}. When we say {cukta} are we > thinking about a physical instance of a book (with its pages, > hardcover etc) or the concept is general enough to include the > abstract concept of "books"? > I'm for perceiving cukta as an abstract concept. The definition doesn't mention "paper" or any other medium. Not for papri, unfortunately. Wikipedia pages are called ckupau which is fine for me. > > Then I started thinking about "age". We have a "by standard" place for > "young" and "old" which I think it's not to be used to express the > age. Then we have an experimental gismu {laldo} whose gloss suggests > it's just a word for "old" to avoid considering "old" as just the > opposite of "young". > > That said I'm still uncertain on how to express something/someone age ... > > Suggestions? > > remod > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/pX7b0dxa0roJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_216_16320385.1340796786631 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 3:10:18 PM UTC+4, remod wrote:I was trying to say "the 'I Ching' is a= book more than 5000 years old".

The first problem I encountered is {cukta}. When we say {cukta} are we
thinking about a physical instance of a book (with its pages,
hardcover etc) or the concept is general enough to include the
abstract concept of "books"?

I'm for perceiving cukta as an abstrac= t concept. The definition doesn't mention "paper" or any other medium.
Not for papri, unfortunately.
Wikipedia pages are called ck= upau which is fine for me.
"young" and "old" which I think it's not to be used to express the
age. Then we have an experimental gismu {laldo} whose gloss suggests
it's just a word for "old" to avoid considering "old" as just the
opposite of "young".

That said I'm still uncertain on how to express something/someone age .= ..

Suggestions?

remod

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/pX= 7b0dxa0roJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_216_16320385.1340796786631--