Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:60846) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Skrag-0006D4-5p; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:55:41 -0700 Received: by ghbf16 with SMTP id f16sf3910766ghb.16 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:55:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=v+vZguBW8BnfEQ+g4FJaNq7CsO5JZlLT0wILRtT4dMI=; b=16/F/fb/6WgtL4uCEGJD7WhROoCaA7MJJu52TXRJLzkEniC2/JzUoPJAqzTx30ZFqk AWV2ZngJPFRz76Nw337r+THyYWNupHvY58r/CdG4by4nXnZ0ACpKh4qWqUnEyvAUakti OkcpEI1LVInhngq8fTXq0WqkBqSUeSP0IqBIo= Received: by 10.50.77.234 with SMTP id v10mr110968igw.2.1341039327706; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:55:27 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.15.199 with SMTP id z7ls1884843igc.3.canary; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.147.195 with SMTP id o3mr3241748icv.4.1341039327107; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.147.195 with SMTP id o3mr3241747icv.4.1341039327089; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com (mail-ob0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10si1473819igs.0.2012.06.29.23.55.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.179; Received: by obbeh20 with SMTP id eh20so414839obb.10 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:55:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.20.136 with SMTP id n8mr3458983oee.54.1341039326550; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.85.68 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:55:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:55:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] The x3 of {srana} From: Ian Johnson To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: blindbravado@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of blindbravado@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=blindbravado@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1fcdeb0597e04c3ab0c18 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8fb1fcdeb0597e04c3ab0c18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sometimes these are like that because "this gismu is that gismu but without this being inherent to it". I agree in many cases, though. mu'o mi'e la latro'a noi ge lo bebna cu cmene ke'a gi zo latros pu cmene ke'a On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > I agree. There's actually a lot of gismu that I feel are missing a place, > most of which are specifically for reasons of regularity, i.e. all the > other gismu of the same class have place structure "x1 is broda of x2 in > way x3", and this one is only "x1 is broda of x2". > > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Jacob Errington wrote: > >> coi rodo >> >> Twice now, I've had to use {sekai} in order to get a sort of "complete >> srana" such that "srana = x1 pertains to x2 in aspect x3". >> I feel like this should be a part of the place structure of srana >> proper. Adding a place to a gismu breaks no usage, as we all know, so >> there is no fear of corrupting existing Lojban. >> >> Does anyone agree? >> >> mu'o mi'e la tsani >> >> p.s. I'm not really *proposing* that we effect this change *now*. But, >> I'm just saying that it would be really neat, if maybe when a bigger >> reworking of the language comes around, that we add this place, which >> seems really srana to srana, if you know what I mean. >> >> I'll also be adding this to the gismu issues page. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o > (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e89a8fb1fcdeb0597e04c3ab0c18 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sometimes these are like that because "this gismu is that gismu but wi= thout this being inherent to it". I agree in many cases, though.
mu'o mi'e la latro'a noi ge lo bebna cu cmene ke'a gi zo = latros pu cmene ke'a

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Jonathan Jo= nes <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree. There's actually a lot of gismu that I feel are missing a plac= e, most of which are specifically for reasons of regularity, i.e. all the o= ther gismu of the same class have place structure "x1 is broda of x2 i= n way x3", and this one is only "x1 is broda of x2".


On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Jacob Erri= ngton <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
coi rodo

Twice now, I've had to use {sekai} in order to get a sort of "comp= lete
srana" such that "srana =3D x1 pertains to x2 in aspect x3".=
I feel like this should be a part of the place structure of srana
proper. Adding a place to a gismu breaks no usage, as we all know, so
there is no fear of corrupting existing Lojban.

Does anyone agree?

mu'o mi'e la tsani

p.s. I'm not really *proposing* that we effect this change *now*. But,<= br> I'm just saying that it would be really neat, if maybe when a bigger reworking of the language comes around, that we add this place, which
seems really srana to srana, if you know what I mean.

I'll also be adding this to the gismu issues page.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.




--
mu'o mi'e .aionys= .

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu d= o zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8fb1fcdeb0597e04c3ab0c18--