Received: from mail-qa0-f56.google.com ([209.85.216.56]:64656)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCKOXn8wTEISfxf8EGgRxuhLv@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1SlbBe-0008MR-Ey; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:36:50 -0700
Received: by qaas11 with SMTP id s11sf3461518qaa.1
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
         :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=3XYePgr8DBVpmm98T1mJT4GlqXzm9aTN1Qq/qR7ECUs=;
        b=PyLPOn9K4RcWz6P2FNYnTb+Bdp1erT+6KdsAOht46nWftGDt/1Wrix5ZdgZV7GxR5u
         6tcuPdxm+BA7oUo/lERmWZGVW8lM5q4dYIQnbOreMoEIByDSJJSjd6xtM65RTiqYUCkn
         kJl+bI2HkwOVJppjy2p6Tfee+VyXyV/BrBO5g=
Received: by 10.236.195.38 with SMTP id o26mr49750yhn.6.1341214596789;
        Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.93.48 with SMTP id k36ls10287057yhf.6.gmail; Mon, 02 Jul
 2012 00:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.114.193 with SMTP id c41mr265345yhh.17.1341214596224;
        Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 00:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <bb98fb29-21de-461f-ab59-9c3df6675166@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <bac4e707-21fc-49ae-9e5e-6c5790dadcf2@googlegroups.com>
References: <90a7e54c-42fe-4ee0-9693-8155db9a7646@googlegroups.com>
 <bac4e707-21fc-49ae-9e5e-6c5790dadcf2@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Is there any demand for LoCCan3?
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1623_19285087.1341214594826"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_1623_19285087.1341214594826
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Do you think this next-step language will still be compatible with the 
current baseline?

On Monday, July 2, 2012 10:26:12 AM UTC+4, la .lindar. wrote:
>
> It's come up a few times.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaphora_(linguistics)
>
> I think we're working on the rest.
>
> It's a theoretical next-step language, but I don't see it happening any 
> time soon since we're changing up our game.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/WuHVVjYqa8EJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


------=_Part_1623_19285087.1341214594826
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Do you think this next-step language will still be compatible with the curr=
ent baseline?<br><br>On Monday, July 2, 2012 10:26:12 AM UTC+4, la .lindar.=
 wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.=
8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">It's come up a few time=
s.<div><a href=3D"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaphora_(linguistics)" tar=
get=3D"_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/<wbr>Anaphora_(linguistics)</a=
><br></div><div><br></div><div>I think we're working on the rest.</div><div=
><br></div><div>It's a theoretical next-step language, but I don't see it h=
appening any time soon since we're changing up our game.</div></blockquote>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msg/lojban/-/WuHVVjYqa8EJ">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Wu=
HVVjYqa8EJ</a>.<br />=20
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



------=_Part_1623_19285087.1341214594826--