Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:34113) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SlbYD-0008Ri-Ay; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 01:00:14 -0700 Received: by werm13 with SMTP id m13sf3563637wer.16 for ; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:59:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=kCsp0cYa8nWib+MAcJDvSabdjlHRYL5d0KLKKLeCh3k=; b=2mQsxtMpTsLp9XgLBjcdoNtrGhV7yO0xBhS8viNchX47ihzzREjkG//A2LbM0PkurU SAB/hUh+JKb9fYUEMyGwqUfsWlRWYC1rT9rV7jXpS84NuI0om+g9NF/otoiQlETwPh1Y SQk8OBCAnjWIesj/c0okI8wXrYxlLBhIJGODY= Received: by 10.204.150.91 with SMTP id x27mr379495bkv.31.1341215997567; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:59:57 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.154.131 with SMTP id o3ls757601bkw.6.gmail; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.133.196 with SMTP id hz4mr1329345bkc.4.1341215995939; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.133.196 with SMTP id hz4mr1329344bkc.4.1341215995904; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com (mail-lb0-f178.google.com [209.85.217.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j4si3382672bkj.3.2012.07.02.00.59.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.178; Received: by lbbgj10 with SMTP id gj10so8802743lbb.23 for ; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:59:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.41.2 with SMTP id b2mr5777147lbl.58.1341215995496; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.46.36 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 00:59:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <90a7e54c-42fe-4ee0-9693-8155db9a7646@googlegroups.com> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 01:59:55 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any demand for LoCCan3? From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4efe2a28fa894c04c3d42e4c X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e0cb4efe2a28fa894c04c3d42e4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No. It would be an entirely new language, and no more compatible with Lojban than Lojban is with Loglan. On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:36 AM, gleki wrote: > Do you think this next-step language will still be compatible with the > current baseline? > > > On Monday, July 2, 2012 10:26:12 AM UTC+4, la .lindar. wrote: >> >> It's come up a few times. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Anaphora_(linguistics) >> >> I think we're working on the rest. >> >> It's a theoretical next-step language, but I don't see it happening any >> time soon since we're changing up our game. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/WuHVVjYqa8EJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e0cb4efe2a28fa894c04c3d42e4c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No. It would be an entirely new language, and no more compatible with Lojba= n than Lojban is with Loglan.

On Mon, Jul= 2, 2012 at 1:36 AM, gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
Do you think this next-step language will st= ill be compatible with the current baseline?


On Mo= nday, July 2, 2012 10:26:12 AM UTC+4, la .lindar. wrote:
It's come up a few times.

I think we&= #39;re working on the rest.

It's a theoretical next-step language, but I don= 9;t see it happening any time soon since we're changing up our game.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/WuHVVjYqa8EJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e0cb4efe2a28fa894c04c3d42e4c--