Received: from mail-ee0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:62926)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRC6w8j_BBoEgh9d7A@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1SlpBb-0003Ls-9G; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:33:45 -0700
Received: by eekb57 with SMTP id b57sf4337938eek.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=8hhS6HwHDdrGAcfYMTTtSBG+PFF9XcjKIeVDDMnzsHI=;
        b=seZd86Mjm5EgnFef0IV/B2meEA5SoYx1ckiJ5U4YWL4JkWMqYnT2XsSdVF04FMPfn0
         PjgJqcV927keEQLA3clNqJ9L7XOnXJ4MYwD3ytwxdcinGPlEmUmdYlIYops4Mq4dsazR
         UT7R1hYAoVqANAVAVyu4oVUhdTe7aceLSL4zM=
Received: by 10.205.121.143 with SMTP id gc15mr298547bkc.25.1341268410198;
        Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.130.152 with SMTP id t24ls6138622bks.1.gmail; Mon, 02 Jul
 2012 15:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr191456bks.2.1341268409179;
        Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr191452bks.2.1341268408730;
        Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (mail-lb0-f171.google.com [209.85.217.171])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iv15si2998450bkc.0.2012.07.02.15.33.28
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.171;
Received: by lbom4 with SMTP id m4so8444858lbo.2
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.25.106 with SMTP id b10mr6928006lbg.36.1341268408225; Mon,
 02 Jul 2012 15:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.63.48 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALm==BX-p_3poeyE+giSZW+5uG+a9uR522C2UvX671EzQdBoAA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <90a7e54c-42fe-4ee0-9693-8155db9a7646@googlegroups.com>
	<bac4e707-21fc-49ae-9e5e-6c5790dadcf2@googlegroups.com>
	<62818d3a-c188-43d5-ad25-09c4cc9aca6c@googlegroups.com>
	<1341252212.22198.YahooMailNeo@web184415.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<CALm==BX-p_3poeyE+giSZW+5uG+a9uR522C2UvX671EzQdBoAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 19:33:28 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2fwCRTp5X6Z6eK=w5r2RSFk5uXMK9u-i3UCXsUHcZMJ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any demand for LoCCan3?
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.171 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:35 PM, .arpis. <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> One of the things that drew me to lojban was the fact that the gismu
> relationships were carefully defined (e.g. [almost?] every one that could
> have a "by standard" place did).

How do you determine which ones couldn't have a "by standard" place?
It seems to me that every relationship could have a "by standard"
place added, so those gismu that have an explicit one are only a small
fraction of those that could have it.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.